Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Mercy Not Sacrifice

Home
About
My Book
Archives
More
- Theology
- Culture
- Politics
- Sermons
- Bible
- Devotions
- Daily Office
- Podcast

Home
Progressive Christian
Is the Holy Spirit a respecter of institutions?

Is the Holy Spirit a respecter of institutions?

Last updated on: July 17, 2016 at 10:10 am by Morgan Guyton

Is the Holy Spirit a respecter of institutions? 2016-07-17T10:10:59-05:00 Morgan Guyton

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Bishop Karen Oliveto with her wife Robin Ridenour

Some United Methodists are overjoyed about the election of Karen Oliveto, our first openly queer bishop. Others are very upset about it. Those who are upset about it tend to be upset for two reasons. Conservatives think being a “practicing homosexual” is sinful. Moderates think any changes that happen to United Methodist polity need to follow the protocol of our General Conference process. I’ve spent most of my time responding to the first concern. What about the second concern? Should gay United Methodists who are called to ordained ministry either do something else with their lives or switch to a different denomination out of respect for the institution of United Methodism? Ecclesial disobedience is certainly a different thing than civil disobedience. Is ecclesial disobedience ever valid?

The Bible is filled with examples of people defying the religious authorities of their day. In retrospect, we know who was on the right side from the perspective of our biblical canon. For many conservative evangelicals, we’re not allowed to make analogies between our day and what people did in the Bible because the lives of the characters in the Bible have been canonized. Why is it that we make the words of Peter and Paul authoritative but not what they actually did?

In Acts 5, Peter and John were dragged before the Sanhedrin religious council because they had been preaching about Jesus without authorization:

The high priest questioned them, saying, “We gave you strict orders not to teach in this name, yet here you have filled Jerusalem with your teaching and you are determined to bring this man’s blood on us.” But Peter and the apostles answered, “We must obey God rather than any human authority. The God of our ancestors raised up Jesus, whom you had killed by hanging him on a tree. God exalted him at his right hand as Leader and Savior that he might give repentance to Israel and forgiveness of sins. And we are witnesses to these things, and so is the Holy Spirit whom God has given to those who obey him.”

As shocking as it may seem, the United Methodists who are pursuing the path that they call “biblical obedience” are not being cynical and insolent to use the word “obedience.” They actually believe that they are being obedient to God rather than human authority. Maybe they’re wrong, but that’s what they believe. Something happened in their lives which they interpreted as a sign from the Holy Spirit that gave them the conviction that choosing a more congenial, compliant course of action would be a betrayal of God. And the reason they use the word “biblical” is because there’s a whole lot of Bible other than the 3 or 4 anti-gay clobber passages which they’re drawing upon in their discernment.

I’ll never forget the day I stopped being a moderate. In my first year of ministry, I had sat down at a table at a clergy event with two female pastors. Somehow I ended up telling them my story of coming to United Methodism through a queer congregation. And I chuckled and said of course I couldn’t write anything about it in my commissioning papers. Then one of the women said why not and the pain in both of their eyes filled me with shame. God kept goading me with that moment until I began to share my story openly. Because he really did save me through that queer United Methodist church. And for me to say I got mine and just climb the career ladder of bigger and bigger United Methodist churches without ever disclosing where I came from would have been a betrayal of the queer people who showed me the gospel.

I have not discerned that God is commanding me to violate the Discipline and marry two queer people. But I do have queer students who are exploring a call to ministry, and I am encouraging them to pursue that call no differently than if they were straight. I’m not claiming to be able to discern with absolute certainty that clergy who violate the Discipline are doing so out of obedience to God. But we shouldn’t presume that the will of God cannot contradict the will of a majority of United Methodist General Conference delegates. We simply cannot speak with certainty either way.

I believe that our Discipline’s anti-gay stance is undermining our denomination’s ability to promote sexual holiness because of our entanglement with toxic culture war. Instead of a reactionary sexual ethic that was constructed as a backlash against the sexual revolution of the sixties, we need an articulation of holy sexuality that is aligned with the Wesleyan goal of perfection in love. I think the idolatry of traditional gender norms is a distracting stumbling block that gets in the way of articulating holy sexuality. I really hope that our denomination’s commission will actually be able to have a spirit-led conversation about this rather than fall into a political stalemate among people whose minds are completely made up. Every time in the past that our General Conference has empowered a commission to examine the issue, they have concluded in favor of changing our Discipline’s language and the subsequent General Conference has rejected their findings.

So why not wait till the commission rules to ordain openly queer clergy and consecrate an openly queer bishop? I understand the moderate perspective in the abstract. But I can’t imagine telling one of my queer students that they should go into a different career field and then perhaps pursue ministry after that only if the 2020 General Conference actually honors the findings of its sexuality commission this time around. If God calls people to ministry, they should follow that call. The institution of United Methodism is not more sacrosanct than the Holy Spirit’s call.

The way I’ve come to understand it is that the ecclesial disobedience is part of our discernment process, for better or worse. Those on the other side should determine if God is calling them to file charges in response. And our bishops should ask God how to respond to these charges in a way that best reflects the grace and truth of Christ. If our conversation doesn’t involve being confronted with openly queer Christians who are called to marriage and ordained ministry, we will not be able to adequately discern what God is doing. Discernment must involve personal stories that reveal the fruits of the flesh and the fruits of the spirit which illumine our interpretation of whatever scripture is analogously applicable to our context. It may feel “objective” to talk about an issue in the abstract, but that’s Enlightenment thinking, not biblical thinking.

The fact that the Bible is canonized does not mean that it is abstract, impersonal logic. Every word within it is somebody’s personal testimony. As 1 John 1:1 says, “We declare to you what was from the beginning, what we have heard, what we have seen with our eyes, what we have looked at and touched with our hands, concerning the word of life**.**” So when we include personal testimony in our discernment process, we are not being “subjective” in a way that contradicts the Bible’s “objectivity.” We are actually emulating how the early church sought the will of God in Acts 15. Part of determining whether queer clergy are “incompatible with biblical teaching” is to look at the ministry fruit of openly queer clergy.

Whether or not you agree with me, I urge you not to be consumed with anger and cynicism in response to Bishop Oliveto’s election. Pray about it. If God tells you to respond in some kind of way, then do so. Just remember that if you’re right, God is counting on you to speak with enough grace and humility that your words will not be easily dismissed. If you alienate people by being crass and self-righteous in your presentation of the truth, then you have betrayed God. My hope is that missional wisdom will prevail among our leaders and we will figure out a way of structuring the church that allows us to escape our gridlock and share the gospel each of us is given with the mission field to which each of us is called.

Check out my book on Amazon!

Subscribe to our podcast Crackers and Grape Juice!

Like my author page on Facebook!

Previous Post

July 16, 2016

Could a queer bishop restore Wesleyan holiness to the United Methodist Church?

Next Post

July 18, 2016 Wild Goose interviews: #1 Alicia Crosby

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Advent Beauty Will Save the World Bible Big Picture: Ephesians Bloggers Book Christian salvation and the Beautitudes Culture Daily Office Danceable Homiletics Deadly Sins Deep Roots: Genesis Devotions Dominican Republic May 2011 El Principio Misericordia (The Mercy Principle) Five verses God tattooed on my heart Fundraising FutureGospel Good Biblical Words Henri Nouwen Interview Jennings' Christian Imagination Jesus inside the beltway Jesus Is My Candidate Jesus vs the Pharisees Jesus vs. Plato Journey to Eternity Looking Back on 2012 Love Actually Monday Merton Monday Merton Music Occupy the manger On Earth As It Is In Heaven Original Sin Podcast Poetry Politics Prayer Psalm 119 Radical Jesus 101 Reviews Sermon on the Mount Sermons Spanish Bible study Special Series Spiritual but not religious Synchroblog Theology Things that made me think Thomas a Kempis Ugliness Into Beauty Uncategorized Viaje Dominicano 2013 Walking in the Valley (Lent) Welcome: It's More than a Mat Wild Goose 2013 Wrestling

Select a Month March 2022 January 2022 December 2021 September 2021 April 2021 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was the mother of John Mark, whose house was a place of prayer in Jerusalem?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Lydia Mary Tabitha Priscilla