What would it look like for love to win in the United Methodist Church?

Last updated on: May 26, 2016 at 1:45 pm by Morgan Guyton

What would it look like for love to win in the United Methodist Church? 2016-05-26T13:45:27-05:00 Morgan Guyton

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Love wins. Ever since Rob Bell wrote the book in 2011, it’s been the battle cry of progressive Christians everywhere. We make bumper stickers and memes and t-shirts. It’s such a beautiful ideological concept. It’s how we define ourselves against people on the other side. But one of the things I’ve been convicted by recently is whether I actually live and speak as though love really does win. Is love really my strategy, my agenda, and my goal? Or is it just a code word that I’m using for a particular ideological perspective?

One of the most recent manifestations of this idea that love wins was the proposed rule 44 at the United Methodist General Conference. Rule 44 called on General Conference delegates to break into small groups rather than legislative committees to have conversations about sensitive topics like sexuality framed by a more personal set of questions than the cold, purely rationalistic approach of Robert’s Rules. The idea behind rule 44 was that if people could be vulnerable and see each other’s hearts, then we might get past our entrenched ideological positions or at least not demonize the other side. Most of the people who argued against rule 44 said they liked the idea of it but didn’t think it was practical within the constraints of General Conference. I wanted them to be wrong, but the more I thought about it, I figured they were probably right about the logistical challenge it posed.

So I started thinking about trying to make rule 44 a way of life instead of just a decision-making process. What if it we made relationship-building across ideological silos a priority for its own sake rather than just a strategy for political change? What if over the next four years we make it a spiritual discipline especially among United Methodist elders to learn the stories of people on the other side of our ideological debates? Everything we say about being part of a “covenant” is a complete farce if we lack personal relationships with each other. It’s so easy to get siloed by the demands of our local ministry contexts and also by the political polarization we are socialized into by the culture around us.

As I write this, it feels very naive and polyanna. Maybe it is. But I can tell you how love wins in my own life. Love wins when people I argue with online send me a private message to say they were praying for my back to heal and wanting to know how I’m holding up on my book tour. Love wins when the humility and compassion of my ideological enemies makes it impossible for me to stamp them with all-encompassing explanations like white supremacist heteronormative capitalist patriarchy. Love wins when I see other human beings who love instead of my brilliant deconstructions that make me feel awesome.

Love doesn’t win when the only interactions we have with people who are different than us happen in an impersonal, hostile space. Love doesn’t win through “points of order” (which isn’t to say they aren’t necessary). Love doesn’t win when we’re able to crush our opponents and make them look stupid. Love doesn’t win through satire, even if satire is an important and valid part of telling the truth. Love doesn’t win if I’m the one doing the conquering. Love only wins if I am won over to love.

I’m not saying I’m going to throw away any of my convictions or sell out the people who have mentored me in my journey. But I do want to build some authentic relationships with people who think differently than me without trying to change them. My friend Tom Berlin described the United Methodist Church as being like trench warfare in World War I. I wonder if love looks like leaving the safety of your trench to walk into the no man’s land between the trenches. I recognize that this calling isn’t for everyone, particularly people whose identities are attacked in ways that mine has never been. But I’m going to try making friends with more people who completely disagree with me. Maybe it will make a small difference in the tenor of our conversation as a church.

My hope is that when we decide the best way to move forward, it will be a decision made in love. I’m not sure that I can remain in a denomination with people who can only be in the same denomination with me if they have complete control over how I do ministry with LGBT people. But maybe we can be in covenant in a different sense. Most of my closest pastor friends right now are not even Methodist at all, but we love each other and pray for the fruitfulness of our respective ministries. So my hope is to gain deeper covenant with Christians who can help me love better because they hear what I say a lot differently than I do. If we all pursue authentic covenant with one another in our respective contexts, then God will coax us into deeper love. And whatever the result of that deeper love is, it certainly won’t make things any worse.

Previous Post

May 24, 2016

An open letter to Timothy Tennent

Next Post

May 27, 2016 Survey shows Christians prefer making fun of people to sharing the gospel

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Advent Beauty Will Save the World Bible Big Picture: Ephesians Bloggers Book Christian salvation and the Beautitudes Culture Daily Office Danceable Homiletics Deadly Sins Deep Roots: Genesis Devotions Dominican Republic May 2011 El Principio Misericordia (The Mercy Principle) Five verses God tattooed on my heart Fundraising FutureGospel Good Biblical Words Henri Nouwen Interview Jennings' Christian Imagination Jesus inside the beltway Jesus Is My Candidate Jesus vs the Pharisees Jesus vs. Plato Journey to Eternity Looking Back on 2012 Love Actually Monday Merton Monday Merton Music Occupy the manger On Earth As It Is In Heaven Original Sin Podcast Poetry Politics Prayer Psalm 119 Radical Jesus 101 Reviews Sermon on the Mount Sermons Spanish Bible study Special Series Spiritual but not religious Synchroblog Theology Things that made me think Thomas a Kempis Ugliness Into Beauty Uncategorized Viaje Dominicano 2013 Walking in the Valley (Lent) Welcome: It's More than a Mat Wild Goose 2013 Wrestling

Select a Month March 2022 January 2022 December 2021 September 2021 April 2021 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE