Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Mercy Not Sacrifice

Home
About
My Book
Archives
More
- Theology
- Culture
- Politics
- Sermons
- Bible
- Devotions
- Daily Office
- Podcast

Home
Progressive Christian
Three options for the United Methodist Church moving forward

Three options for the United Methodist Church moving forward

Last updated on: May 17, 2016 at 7:00 pm by Morgan Guyton

Three options for the United Methodist Church moving forward 2016-05-17T19:00:15-05:00 Morgan Guyton

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

As expected, the conservative evangelicals at General Conference have a solid majority. It is likely that they will not only reject every possible compromise for our Book of Discipline, but also tighten the noose by instituting a mandatory minimum punishment for LGBT clergy and clergy who officiate same-sex weddings. As I wrote in a previous blog post, this would represent the crossing of a red line for progressive United Methodists like me. We have a very unique situation in the United Methodist Church right now because our geographic regions vary drastically in their support for LGBT inclusion. Some areas are 100% in favor of it, while others are 100% against it. If the ideological conservatives get everything they want and refuse to compromise at all, we will have a schism. The question is what form it will take. We have three options before us.

1. Regional autonomy

The least disruptive decision that could be made at this point would be to empower annual conferences to decide how to handle LGBT inclusion. There are various different proposals for doing this with advantages and disadvantages to each. In the Western and Northeastern Jurisdictions, the anti-gay stance of our denomination is crippling our pastors’ ability to do evangelism in the community. The question conservatives need to ask is whether the denomination’s stance on homosexuality is a gospel issue. In other words, do you think that people will go to hell for supporting gay marriage?

If so, then it makes sense to prevent all United Methodist pastors everywhere from participating in it. If you think people can support gay marriage and still be Christians, then you need to ask whether you really want to create a stumbling block for the gospel in cultural contexts outside of the Bible belt. In Mark 9:42, Jesus says, “If any of you put a stumbling block before one of these little ones who believe in me, it would be better for you if a great millstone were hung around your neck and you were thrown into the sea.” If supporting gay marriage means you’re not really Christian, then those of us who support it are the stumbling blocks. If it’s not an essential gospel issue, then those who make it a stumbling block will be held to account for every disciple who is lost to Jesus because of the church’s anti-gay stance.

2. A planned split

If a majority of General Conference delegates are unwilling to be part of a church where LGBT people across the world are being ordained or married, then another option is for us to plan a split. This would be a disaster in which we would lose lots of church members, but it would have the advantage of being something we negotiate thoughtfully. The Good News lobby group has been advocating a split for a long time because their pastors are hemorrhaging members who don’t even want to be part of a church that’s having any conversation about LGBT inclusion. Another advantage of deciding to split is that it would free us up from all the hours of energy spent arguing about the LGBT issue. Though it would result in lost membership, having a clearly defined crisis might also provide the catalyst for missional giving. Our survival will be at stake and we will be forced to start a lot of new things. A planned split would give us the opportunity to close unfruitful, toxic congregations and focus on launching new ones.

3. A chaotic split

The worst case scenario is unfortunately the most likely one, because it seems like the path of least resistance. If the ideological conservatives play winner-take-all at General Conference and they start putting the 111 LGBT clergy and 1500 ally clergy on trial, United Methodism will go through four years of complete hell. Since these trials will provide the opportunity to emulate Christ before the Sanhedrin, they may be fruitful for as a catalyst for progressive church planting, but the denomination as a whole may not survive. If the conservatives refuse to compromise at all, the progressives are not going to slip out the back door quietly. We will go out the front door and we will use the free media as an opportunity to articulate a detoxified version of Wesleyan theology.

Hard-line conservatives have been protected from the devastating consequences of their ideology by the bishops who have refused to put pastors on trial and create a media circus. But it may be that we need to convene thousands of Sanhedrins before the ideologues will be “cut to the heart” (Acts 2:37) by the recognition that they are crucifying Jesus over and over again. It may be that this third option is the crucifixion by which God will rescue us from our institutionalism and resurrect us into two or more movements that each have contagious synergy around a coherent gospel. Because Wesleyan theology has always tended to be pastoral and pragmatic, it lends itself to fuzziness. I suspect that more than a few conservatives envy the theological clarity of the Calvinists who seem so much more successful at building megachurches. Fierce conflict does produce fruitful theological reflection amidst the pain. But make no mistake, the third route represents the greatest threat to the financial viability of United Methodism and our ability to support global ministry.

Previous Post

May 16, 2016

The one verse the church should have been reading for the past 2000 years

Next Post

May 18, 2016 Two ways of being moderate: bridge-building and equal opportunity scorn

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Advent Beauty Will Save the World Bible Big Picture: Ephesians Bloggers Book Christian salvation and the Beautitudes Culture Daily Office Danceable Homiletics Deadly Sins Deep Roots: Genesis Devotions Dominican Republic May 2011 El Principio Misericordia (The Mercy Principle) Five verses God tattooed on my heart Fundraising FutureGospel Good Biblical Words Henri Nouwen Interview Jennings' Christian Imagination Jesus inside the beltway Jesus Is My Candidate Jesus vs the Pharisees Jesus vs. Plato Journey to Eternity Looking Back on 2012 Love Actually Monday Merton Monday Merton Music Occupy the manger On Earth As It Is In Heaven Original Sin Podcast Poetry Politics Prayer Psalm 119 Radical Jesus 101 Reviews Sermon on the Mount Sermons Spanish Bible study Special Series Spiritual but not religious Synchroblog Theology Things that made me think Thomas a Kempis Ugliness Into Beauty Uncategorized Viaje Dominicano 2013 Walking in the Valley (Lent) Welcome: It's More than a Mat Wild Goose 2013 Wrestling

Select a Month March 2022 January 2022 December 2021 September 2021 April 2021 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many disciples did Jesus have?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Seven Twelve Twenty Ten