Is God’s sovereignty threatened by the regulation of guns or pollution?

Last updated on: December 3, 2015 at 11:20 pm by Morgan Guyton

Is God’s sovereignty threatened by the regulation of guns or pollution? 2015-12-03T23:20:44-05:00 Morgan Guyton

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

“God isn’t fixing this,” says the front page of the New York Daily News about the latest mass shooting in San Bernardino, California. The paper shared the tweets of several prominent politicians who said they were “praying” for the victims of the tragedy. Before the shooting happened, the top piece of political news this week was the latest attempt to establish some kind of international agreement about pollution standards in Paris. Of course, any sort of agreement about pollution would be dead on arrival with our current US Congress.

Guns and pollution. Why do so many Christians freak out when you talk about the possibility of regulating either of them? It’s true that there are very powerful gun and polluter lobbies who have been able to buy the politicians in Washington. But they wouldn’t have the power that they do if they weren’t able to tap into the conservative evangelical ethos on the grassroots level. I can’t read other peoples’ minds. I can only draw from my own past indoctrination as a conservative evangelical. But if my hunches are right, then the reason many other evangelicals believe that we’re supposed to keep the government from regulating guns or pollution or just about anything is because doing so would represent an encroachment on God’s sovereignty.

When you grow up evangelical, the one thing you’re indoctrinated with more than anything else is the idea that “the world” sees things one way and Christians are supposed to see things a different way. This is based on scripture. Jesus tells his disciples, “If the world hates you, keep in mind that it hated me first” (John 15:18). James 4:4 says, “Friendship with the world is enmity with God.” So evangelicals are constantly defining themselves in contrast with “the world.” We look for ways to demonstrate that our thinking goes against “the world,” which can be interpreted to mean against science, against how Europeans do things, against political correctness, etc.

So who is “the world”? For many conservative evangelicals, it’s the federal government (with the exception of the military and law enforcement). There are two primary ways that the federal government became “the world” over the past half century. The first was through the civil rights era when the federal government infringed upon the rights of states and private individuals in order to enforce desegregation. Many evangelicals are going to reject any suggestion that they’ve inherited any of their ethos from their segregationist ancestors. Whatever degree we have evolved past our ancestors’ racism, the civil rights era made it “liberal” to support a strong federal government and “conservative” to oppose it.

The second way “the world” became equated with the federal government was through the Cold War. The ideological fault-lines between capitalism and communism turned “the state” into an atheistic entity. Before communism was the enemy, conservative Christianity was not ideologically obligated to oppose a strong federal government. Indeed, the Prohibition at the beginning of the 20th century was a triumph of conservative Christian activism in support of strong regulations from the federal government. But because of the Cold War, the federal government became ideologically representative of secular humanism and thus an encroachment upon the sovereignty of God.

If you’re going to solve society’s problems with God’s help, then you’re supposed to work through your local church, because working through the federal government is the way you build a “communist” society that doesn’t need God. To regulate pollution means acting like God doesn’t have the climate under control. To claim that humans can destroy our ecosystem through our pollution implies that humans can overthrow God. Likewise, regulating guns is perceived as a secular humanist solution to the human problem of sin which can only be solved through a personal relationship with Jesus Christ.

Every social issue is analyzed with the presumption that there’s a secular humanist answer and a Jesus answer. Federal regulation is always the secular humanist answer. So it doesn’t matter what arguments are made or what the data says. Anything that gives more power to the federal government is an attack on God’s existence. It wasn’t this way before the Cold War or the civil rights movement. What will it take for the conservative evangelical worldview to evolve again? How many mass shootings will need to happen? How volatile does the weather have to get?

I’m not sure what the solutions are, but I do think that God would appreciate it if we took our paranoia about his sovereignty and relevance out of the equation so that we could actually have rational conversations about two issues that are causing many of God’s children to suffer.

Please like my blog’s facebook page!

Previous Post

November 28, 2015

Can Christian theology promote terrorism?

Next Post

December 5, 2015 Is gunslinger Christianity even actually conservative?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Advent Beauty Will Save the World Bible Big Picture: Ephesians Bloggers Book Christian salvation and the Beautitudes Culture Daily Office Danceable Homiletics Deadly Sins Deep Roots: Genesis Devotions Dominican Republic May 2011 El Principio Misericordia (The Mercy Principle) Five verses God tattooed on my heart Fundraising FutureGospel Good Biblical Words Henri Nouwen Interview Jennings' Christian Imagination Jesus inside the beltway Jesus Is My Candidate Jesus vs the Pharisees Jesus vs. Plato Journey to Eternity Looking Back on 2012 Love Actually Monday Merton Monday Merton Music Occupy the manger On Earth As It Is In Heaven Original Sin Podcast Poetry Politics Prayer Psalm 119 Radical Jesus 101 Reviews Sermon on the Mount Sermons Spanish Bible study Special Series Spiritual but not religious Synchroblog Theology Things that made me think Thomas a Kempis Ugliness Into Beauty Uncategorized Viaje Dominicano 2013 Walking in the Valley (Lent) Welcome: It's More than a Mat Wild Goose 2013 Wrestling

Select a Month March 2022 January 2022 December 2021 September 2021 April 2021 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who killed his brother: Cain or Abel?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Abel Adam Seth Cain