Transphobia’s newest target: Winnie the Pooh

Last updated on: November 22, 2014 at 9:30 am by Morgan Guyton

Transphobia’s newest target: Winnie the Pooh 2014-11-22T02:33:33-05:00 Morgan Guyton

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The transphobic Polish town council of Tuszyn has banished Winnie the Pooh from being a mascot for their playground, and Fox News wants you to know all about it. The reason: Pooh doesn’t wear any pants (just a shirt) and there is no bodily indication of which gender Pooh is. I’m used to defaulting to a “he” for Winnie the Pooh, but I’m realizing that might not be Pooh’s preferred gender pronoun. After all, Pooh’s character is not depicted with anatomical correctness, as the Tuszyn council rightly points out. Furthermore, it’s not just Pooh whose gender-ambiguity is problematic, but Rabbit and Piglet also seem to be on the fence. This is every bit as scandalous as the Teletubbies or Frozen conspiracy. It’s an attempt to normalize gender ambiguity in the minds of our children, and by God, we’d better boycott Winnie (whose last name Pooh has a suspiciously eastern sound to it and if you google it, you can find a book called the Tao of Pooh). So Winnie the Pooh not only promotes gender ambiguity but Taoism as well. Oh my!

Can animals live together in a hundred acre wood without explicitly defined gender roles? The only full-blown female in the Pooh stories is Kanga, because she’s a mother. Eeyore, Owl, and Tigger are pretty clearly masculine, but Pooh, Rabbit, and Piglet really do tend to be a little bit ambiguous, particularly in the voices that are used for their characters. I suppose that Pooh’s laziness and tendency to sit around with a hand in a honey bowl is a pretty masculine trait, but Pooh certainly isn’t much of a macho bear. Bears are supposed to be predators that growl and claw at other animals. Pooh is the most un-intimidating bear in the history of bears. What does it do to our children’s minds to see a Pooh bear who’s not only gender-ambiguous but lazy and doesn’t seem to suffer any consequences for it? Pooh gets to sit around and “think” all day like some kind of Taoist sage. There’s an endless supply of honey that Pooh never has to work hard at a decent job to get his hands on.

Likewise Rabbit and Piglet are too fastidious to be perfectly masculine. Rabbit is so obsessed with his/her garden. Piglet is always sweeping his/her house. They should be lifting weights or playing basketball if they’re male animals or at least bouncing like Tigger. Furthermore, Piglet is pink and s/he wears a vague, gender-ambiguous pinkish leotard everywhere. Rabbit is a complete nudist with pink ears and a pink nose who sometimes wears an apron which only girls are supposed to wear. What kind of message is this sending our children?

I’m not nearly as clever a satirist as Andrew Wilson, so I can’t stay in character for the whole post. But this story illustrates the incredible silliness of the recent reactionary movement of neo-patriarchy which apparently is now happening in Poland too (I wonder if the town council of Tuszyn was evangelized by Southern Baptist missionaries). Winnie the Pooh was created in the 1920’s, when patriarchy was certainly the norm, but its proponents weren’t scouring animated characters to make sure they fell into appropriate gender roles like the paranoid reactionaries of today. Interestingly, Winnie the Pooh’s creator A.A. Milne named his son Christopher Robin because he thought he and his wife were going to have a girl whom they would name Robin, so when they had a son, they just gave him a boy name and the name he would have had if he were a girl.

As I was reading this article that my wife shared with me last night, I was chuckling about the way my youngest son had previously run over to me and demanded that I watch him do the ballet routine he learned as part of his kindergarten curriculum at the charter school we have our boys in. Their physical education class is called dance and fitness. There is no concept that dance is something that girls do. Once a month, they have a school-wide performance for all the parents where boys and girls alike perform complicated dance routines led by their choreographer/gym teacher who seems like a regular old, loudly hetero/masculine bearded giant Cajun dude.

What if my son eventually becomes a champion ballet dancer? That would be awesome! He could just as easily become a really good soccer player. I’m sure the ballet is helping him a lot with his foot skills. It would be awesome if both of my sons could continue to live in a world where activities aren’t segregated into boy-appropriate and girl-appropriate. Some people are terrified that we’re moving that direction as a culture. I see it as being no more harmful than an episode of Winnie the Pooh. But I guess if you see things differently, you’d better burn those Winnie the Pooh DVD’s before they corrupt your children’s minds.

Previous Post

November 20, 2014

If you need for undocumented immigrants to be punished, then you don't believe in Jesus' cross

Next Post

November 28, 2014 A Thanksgiving IHOP run and my complicity in the failure of capitalism

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Advent Beauty Will Save the World Bible Big Picture: Ephesians Bloggers Book Christian salvation and the Beautitudes Culture Daily Office Danceable Homiletics Deadly Sins Deep Roots: Genesis Devotions Dominican Republic May 2011 El Principio Misericordia (The Mercy Principle) Five verses God tattooed on my heart Fundraising FutureGospel Good Biblical Words Henri Nouwen Interview Jennings' Christian Imagination Jesus inside the beltway Jesus Is My Candidate Jesus vs the Pharisees Jesus vs. Plato Journey to Eternity Looking Back on 2012 Love Actually Monday Merton Monday Merton Music Occupy the manger On Earth As It Is In Heaven Original Sin Podcast Poetry Politics Prayer Psalm 119 Radical Jesus 101 Reviews Sermon on the Mount Sermons Spanish Bible study Special Series Spiritual but not religious Synchroblog Theology Things that made me think Thomas a Kempis Ugliness Into Beauty Uncategorized Viaje Dominicano 2013 Walking in the Valley (Lent) Welcome: It's More than a Mat Wild Goose 2013 Wrestling

Select a Month March 2022 January 2022 December 2021 September 2021 April 2021 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was Ruth's first husband?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Mahlon Elimelech Chilion Boaz