No, David Brooks, the poor are not the prodigal son

Last updated on: July 17, 2014 at 1:58 pm by Morgan Guyton

No, David Brooks, the poor are not the prodigal son 2014-07-17T13:58:28-05:00 Morgan Guyton

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

David Brooks has done it again. This time he wrote a column about how America’s class divisions are illustrated by the parable of the prodigal son: “We live in a divided society in which many of us in the middle- and upper-middle classes are like the older brother and many of the people who drop out of school, commit crimes and abandon their children are like the younger brother.” The point of his column was to exhort the “older brothers” not to be snobby moralists but to have compassion on the poor people who are like their “younger brothers.” Except that by making this blanket statement about why poor people are poor, Brooks becomes the snobby moralist he’s supposedly critiquing.

There’s no way to make a legitimate analogy between the story of the prodigal son and the class divide in America. When rich kids spend their inheritance money on drugs and prostitutes, they get to run back home when they hit rock bottom and crash-land at Mom and Dad’s house. I know because I was a prodigal son. I didn’t waste my inheritance money on drugs and prostitutes, but when I bottomed out in my mid-twenties due to clinical depression and poor lifestyle choices, I had a home where I could crash-land.

Poor kids don’t have inheritance money to squander, and they often don’t have a stable home to which they can flee in their mid-twenties when life caves in on them. It’s not that rich people need to see that they are the cruel, heartless elder brother in the prodigal son story; there are many generous, compassionate rich people. The problem is rather the stereotype that poor people are in poverty because they “dropped out of school, committed crimes, and abandoned their children.” And thus they need to “repent” by becoming middle-class because helping them before they “repent” would be “enabling” them. As long as that stereotype is allowed to represent poverty uncontested, our rich congresspeople will continue to do things like cut the food stamp program in order to “teach” poor people “self-sufficiency.” Poor people make bad choices about as readily as rich people do, but they’re born into impossible circumstances where there’s no grace for bad choices.

So here’s Brooks’ solution to the problem of poverty according to the logic of the parable:

The father teaches that rebinding and reordering society requires an aggressive assertion: You are accepted; you are accepted. It requires mutual confession and then a mutual turning toward some common project. Why does the father organize a feast? Because a feast is nominally about food, but, in Jewish life, it is really about membership. It reasserts your embedded role in the community project. The father’s lesson for us is that if you live in a society that is coming apart on class lines, the best remedies are oblique. They are projects that bring the elder and younger brothers together for some third goal: national service projects, infrastructure-building, strengthening a company or a congregation.

You can’t engage in a “community project” in an economy that’s built on the presupposition that “community projects” inevitably generate wasteful bureaucracies. Look at the awkwardness of David Brooks trying to make his “community project” work under the terms of his libertarian value system: “national service projects, infrastructure-building, strengthening a company or a congregation.” So in other words, he thinks that companies will be “strengthened” by hiring poor people to do “infrastructure building” or a “national service project” at a living wage for the good of society? Or that congregations will double their budgets and challenge their members to give 20% instead of 10% (actually 2.5%) so they can add a bunch of poor people to their payroll to do “national service projects” and “infrastructure building”? How likely is either of these to happen?

The reason that our society lacks a sense of collective responsibility for those who don’t have enough resources to survive is because they are seen as prodigal younger brothers who have squandered their father’s inheritance on drugs and prostitutes. So David Brooks’ illustration reinforces the problem that he’s purportedly trying to address. There are poor people who are poor because they made bad choices. There are also poor people who had stable, college-educated middle-class careers that were completely derailed by the Great Recession and never came back in the jobless recovery. There are also poor people who grew up poor and have stayed poor in an era when economic mobility is worse than it’s ever been. In 1987, economists measured income heritability (the likelihood that you would earn the same income as your parents) at 20%. By 2004, it had risen to 50-60%, and that was before the Great Recession.

The poor people I know already do work hard; what they lack is a job that actually pays enough to cover their needs. I know a military veteran who has been gainfully employed for most of her life. She never went crazy or got into drugs or anything like that; she just got laid off in the recession and couldn’t find a job because of her age, so ultimately she ended up homeless. Thankfully, a county program was able to get her a section 8 housing voucher, but what she’d really like more than anything is to have a steady job. I’m sure she would love to be hired for a “community project.” Maybe David Brooks is planning to start a non-profit that will pay poor people to do “national service projects” and “infrastructure building” since it’s not okay for the gubment to do things like that.

Previous Post

February 17, 2014

The awkward truth about snake-handling: it's totally Biblical

Next Post

February 19, 2014 Our Journey as a Celibate LGBT Christian Couple (a guest post by Sarah and Lindsey from A Queer Calling)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Advent Beauty Will Save the World Bible Big Picture: Ephesians Bloggers Book Christian salvation and the Beautitudes Culture Daily Office Danceable Homiletics Deadly Sins Deep Roots: Genesis Devotions Dominican Republic May 2011 El Principio Misericordia (The Mercy Principle) Five verses God tattooed on my heart Fundraising FutureGospel Good Biblical Words Henri Nouwen Interview Jennings' Christian Imagination Jesus inside the beltway Jesus Is My Candidate Jesus vs the Pharisees Jesus vs. Plato Journey to Eternity Looking Back on 2012 Love Actually Monday Merton Monday Merton Music Occupy the manger On Earth As It Is In Heaven Original Sin Podcast Poetry Politics Prayer Psalm 119 Radical Jesus 101 Reviews Sermon on the Mount Sermons Spanish Bible study Special Series Spiritual but not religious Synchroblog Theology Things that made me think Thomas a Kempis Ugliness Into Beauty Uncategorized Viaje Dominicano 2013 Walking in the Valley (Lent) Welcome: It's More than a Mat Wild Goose 2013 Wrestling

Select a Month March 2022 January 2022 December 2021 September 2021 April 2021 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

According to 1 Peter, what covers over a multitude of sins?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Faith Repentance Prayer Love