Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Mercy Not Sacrifice

Home
About
My Book
Archives
More
- Theology
- Culture
- Politics
- Sermons
- Bible
- Devotions
- Daily Office
- Podcast

Home
Progressive Christian
Did we crucify Jesus or did God? (Using @ScotMcKnight to bludgeon bad atonement theory)

Did we crucify Jesus or did God? (Using @ScotMcKnight to bludgeon bad atonement theory)

Last updated on: July 17, 2014 at 1:58 pm by Morgan Guyton

Did we crucify Jesus or did God? (Using @ScotMcKnight to bludgeon bad atonement theory) 2014-07-17T13:58:32-05:00 Morgan Guyton

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Scot McKnight had a very interesting post last week concerning a recently popular“scapegoat” atonement theory about Jesus’ cross based on the cultural theory of French philosopher Rene Girard. The scapegoat theory’s basic idea is that God the Father doesn’t demand Jesus’ blood as the price for humanity’s sin, but that we humans needed Jesus to be our scapegoat so that we could be liberated from our sin. McKnight contends that the Girardian view doesn’t count as an atonement theory because in his interpretation of the scapegoat theory, “we side with Christ and God and not those who put him to death.” McKnight says that for an interpretation of the cross to be atonement as such, it must implicate us in the death of Jesus, “the cross [must be] in some way against us.” Interestingly, McKnight’s terms for a valid atonement theory don’t delegitimize Girard’s scapegoat theory nearly as much as they invalidate the default evangelical understanding of the cross as the satisfaction of God’s wrath. I heartily agree with McKnight’s understanding. Humanity crucified Jesus, not God; it is our needs which the cross satisfies, not God’s.

The place we should begin in understanding the importance of Jesus’ cross is with the first sermon that was ever preached about it: Peter’s sermon in the Jerusalem Temple in Acts 2. After sharing several prophetic testimonies about Jesus, Peter concludes by saying: “Therefore let all Israel be assured of this: God has made this Jesus, whom you crucified, both Lord and Messiah” (Acts 2:36). The next verse says that the people were “cut to the heart” and asked Peter what to do. And that was the way that 3000 of them were baptized.

We are supposed to be “cut to the heart” by our implication in the death of the world’s savior. That’s what is supposed to happen to us in response to Jesus’ cross. It’s a critical part of what saves us: the conviction of realizing, as McKnight puts it, that “I am guilty of that death.” The reason this doesn’t happen in much of the evangelical church today is because the cross has been explained as a solution to an invented problem that makes God out to be the universe’s tight-short wearing middle school gym teacher like the infamous Mr. Woodcock portrayed by Bill Bob Thornton in one of the most awful movies I’ve ever seen.

According to this widely disseminated story, sometimes referred to as the “Four Spiritual Laws,” we owe God infinite pushups even for committing the slightest of infractions in His gym class called life because He’s God and He’s infinitely strict, so He gives us the choice of either giving Him pushups for all of eternity in hell or “accepting” His “gift” of brutally murdering His own Son to pay Himself back for our sin. It’s pure nonsense and it’s completely un-Biblical, even though you can certainly read it into the Bible if you want to, which many evangelicals have done.

If God crucified His own Son to pay Himself back for my sin, then I am robbed of the convicting realization that I would have been in the crowd screaming “Crucify him!” (Matthew 27:23) if I had been alive at the time. If it’s all just a moral bank transaction negotiated between Jesus and His Dad, if the entire crowd of hateful people and the deranged Sanhedrin and the vicious Roman soldiers who drove nails into Jesus’ hands were all just puppets of an angry Father dead-set on shooting His hot white wrath all over His Son, then there is no atoning salvation for me in that equation.

The fact is I have been part of that crowd yelling “Crucify him!” many times because Jesus says in Matthew 25:40 that “whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me.” Every time I take out my anxiety and frustration on my wife or sons by yelling at them or mistreating them, I am crucifying Jesus. Every time I blow off someone who is hurting and needs my help, I am crucifying Jesus. Every time I take part in crushing the poor in the Global South through my participation in global capitalism, I am crucifying Jesus. Every time I indulge the lusts and appetites of my flesh that make me all the more selfish and apathetic about the mercy to which God has called me in the lives of others, I am crucifying Jesus. And every time I grasp the small metallic body of Jesus on my rosary crucifix, I’m convicted again and called more deeply into repentance.

Yes, Jesus’ death is a payment for my sin, but God doesn’t need to see the blood to be okay with me; I need to see the blood to be okay with God*.* I not only need to see Jesus’ blood; I need to eat His flesh and drink His blood every week so that I can be crucified to my past and born anew into His body, which I can only imagine doing because His body was broken to let me enter inside of it. Without the safety of His body, I would have no spiritual anchor; I would be tossed back and forth like a “child of wrath” among the chaotic waves created by “the passions of [my] flesh” (Ephesians 2:3). I would live in the hell of being the lonely god of my own personal universe.

Jesus died on the cross to give me a place to put my sin and to show me what needs to happen to my sinful nature so that I can join Him in the real eternal life that He offers me. If I did not have an eternal place to put my sin, then I would never be set free from it. Despite whatever subconscious psychological transference or projections or rationalizations I use to cope with my guilt, my sin will always cling to me until I trust that Jesus really has put my sin to death and that He really said about me no differently than the other people crucifying Him, “Forgive them, Father, for they know not what they do” (Luke 23:34).

I read Rene Girard about 12 years ago when I was just out of college. I’m not sure if I understood or appropriated him correctly, but the tremendously liberating thing he did for me was to free me forever from seeing the cross as some sick, strange anger management device of a Mr. Woodcock kind of God. It was humanity who needed to crucify Jesus so that we could be convicted by seeing our wickedness made plain and naked before us, so that the pure life in Jesus’ blood could wash away the poisonous wrath (Romans 5:9-10) that we cover ourselves in every time that we do evil and discover like Lady Macbeth that we can’t wash it from our hands.

Now the other critical side of the cross that may not be atonement per se is Jesus’ witness of solidarity with the world’s crucified. Because affluent white guys like Scot McKnight and me have historically predominated the theological conversation about Jesus’ cross, we’ve been quite oblivious to the healing power of solidarity in the cross that people of color like Gustavo Gutierrez, Elsa Tamez, James Cone, and Andrew Sung Park have written about. (Incidentally, I don’t see the solidarity dimension anywhere in Girard’s scapegoat theory.) Jesus’ death not only convicts us as bullies; it also vindicates us as victims.

Everyone is both a bully and a victim, though people with privilege like me are a lot more the former than the latter. We need to know that Jesus has paid the price for the nails we have driven into other peoples’ flesh and also that Jesus has felt every nail that has been driven into our flesh. Without a recognition of the solidarity that Jesus’ cross shows to the victims of our sin, it’s easy to see how atonement becomes an abstraction, a divine credit card swipe or a sick sadomasochistic role-play between God the Father and His Son. In fact, I would wager that the perversion of the cross’s interpretation in white evangelical culture is directly tied to the deliberate repression of its message of solidarity by slave-masters, segregationists, and other oppressors of the past who wanted a cross that served only their needs.

In any case, God’s not guilty of killing His Son; I am. And somehow strangely, the victim who has always been my victim every time I have mistreated another person has forgiven me and become my savior and the source of a beautiful everlasting life that He has won for me.

Previous Post

February 4, 2014

Wrestling with disappointment (#sermon #podcast)

Next Post

February 5, 2014 Al Mohler's Nihilistic Man vs. Bill Nye's Reasonable Man

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Advent Beauty Will Save the World Bible Big Picture: Ephesians Bloggers Book Christian salvation and the Beautitudes Culture Daily Office Danceable Homiletics Deadly Sins Deep Roots: Genesis Devotions Dominican Republic May 2011 El Principio Misericordia (The Mercy Principle) Five verses God tattooed on my heart Fundraising FutureGospel Good Biblical Words Henri Nouwen Interview Jennings' Christian Imagination Jesus inside the beltway Jesus Is My Candidate Jesus vs the Pharisees Jesus vs. Plato Journey to Eternity Looking Back on 2012 Love Actually Monday Merton Monday Merton Music Occupy the manger On Earth As It Is In Heaven Original Sin Podcast Poetry Politics Prayer Psalm 119 Radical Jesus 101 Reviews Sermon on the Mount Sermons Spanish Bible study Special Series Spiritual but not religious Synchroblog Theology Things that made me think Thomas a Kempis Ugliness Into Beauty Uncategorized Viaje Dominicano 2013 Walking in the Valley (Lent) Welcome: It's More than a Mat Wild Goose 2013 Wrestling

Select a Month March 2022 January 2022 December 2021 September 2021 April 2021 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which book of the Bible records Paul’s shipwreck?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Acts Romans 2 Timothy 1 Corinthians