Brian Zahnd on Cruciform Evangelism in Colossians 1:24

Last updated on: July 17, 2014 at 2:13 pm by Morgan Guyton

Brian Zahnd on Cruciform Evangelism in Colossians 1:24 2014-07-17T14:13:30-05:00 Morgan Guyton

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I was listening to Brian Zahnd’s podcast Tuesday while waiting for the rest of my mission team in the Santiago airport. In his May 19th sermon “Mystery Revealed,” he preaches on the cosmic reconciliation of all creation in Christ described in Colossians 1. Brian cautions Christians not to take a triumphalist, hegemonic attitude about the cosmic reign of Christ as through its purpose is to serve as our self-affirmation. He says, “”The way of conquest and domination is the way of the old gods that are passing away… When we absorb enough of the sin and suffering of the world in imitation of Christ, people are drawn to Christ.” It’s a very fascinating claim about the nature of evangelism and what it means to take up our crosses and follow a crucified savior.

Brian is riffing on Colossians 1:24 where Paul says something very enigmatic that has caused a lot of anxiety for many gatekeepers of Christian orthodoxy: “I am now rejoicing in my sufferings for your sake and in my flesh I am completing what is lacking in Christ’s afflictions for the sake of his body, that is, the church.” Surely that must be a bad translation. How can anything be lacking in Christ’s afflictions if His death paid the full price for our sins? But the Greek is pretty clear: υστέρηματα from υστερεω (“to fall short”).

Do we need Paul to suffer for our sins too because Christ’s payment was somehow “lacking”? That’s clearly a scandalous claim. The only way this verse makes any sense is if Christ’s suffering does more than the traditional evangelical account of atonement allows for. This is why Brian Zahnd can make his provocative suggestion that suffering with Christ and thus absorbing others’ evil constitutes a form of evangelism.

The way to this interpretation comes through a look at the context of Colossians 1. Earlier in the chapter, Paul writes about the cosmic reconciliation enacted by God through Christ. Verse 20 says “through Him God was pleased to reconcile to himself all things whether on heaven or earth by making peace through the blood of His cross.” There are two important things to note here: 1) God is the agent of reconciliation, not the one who needs to be reconciled or satisfied (as in popular penal substitutionary atonement); 2) it is not only sinful humans who need to be reconciled, but all things on heaven and Earth.

I had not noticed the second part of this before. The cross reconciles to God the rivers that have been poisoned and the landscapes that have been deforested by human greed as well as the animals and plants who have been abused directly or indirectly by our disruption of God’s natural equilibrium. It brings back into harmony everything in creation that has been dissonant. If the cross has this power, then any reductionist interpretation of it as a mere transactional “payment” for the moral demerit of sin is categorically rules out by Colossians 1:20. It covers not only the guilt but also the damage of sin to both culprit and victim, which is why the predominantly ubiquitous Anselmian divine honor-based theology of sin falls so woefully short.

Paul expands on the nature of this reconciliation in verse 22 by saying that the means of our reconciliation is “in his fleshly body through death.” This suggests to me the metaphor of Jesus’ crucified body as a sponge for the violence of a fallen world. He does not conquer evil through conquest and domination but through absorbing our evil and suffering into Himself so that it loses its power.

So if Jesus reconciles the universe to God by absorbing evil and suffering into Himself, then can those of us who are no longer “children of wrath” (Eph 2:3) but are instead incorporated into the body of Christ likewise absorb evil and suffering into ourselves as part of the ongoing work of divine reconciliation? Is the gap between the “already” of Jesus’ cross and the “not yet” of the full eschatological manifestation of His kingdom’s glory a space in which God has graciously allowed us to be co-agents of reconciliation? Did God deliberately leave a space for us to complete (an υστέρηματα) with our cruciform evangelism in which we serve and suffer our way into absorbing the world’s evil? This seems a reasonable way to describe what it means to be incorporated into Jesus Himself (what else does body of Christ mean?!) and obey His command to take up our own crosses. It’s a provocative and beautiful proposal that Brian Zahnd has laid before us.

Previous Post

May 29, 2013

Viaje Dominicano #3: My God is a great big God

Next Post

May 31, 2013 Viaje Dominicana 2013 #4: La Lenguaje de Beisbol

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Advent Beauty Will Save the World Bible Big Picture: Ephesians Bloggers Book Christian salvation and the Beautitudes Culture Daily Office Danceable Homiletics Deadly Sins Deep Roots: Genesis Devotions Dominican Republic May 2011 El Principio Misericordia (The Mercy Principle) Five verses God tattooed on my heart Fundraising FutureGospel Good Biblical Words Henri Nouwen Interview Jennings' Christian Imagination Jesus inside the beltway Jesus Is My Candidate Jesus vs the Pharisees Jesus vs. Plato Journey to Eternity Looking Back on 2012 Love Actually Monday Merton Monday Merton Music Occupy the manger On Earth As It Is In Heaven Original Sin Podcast Poetry Politics Prayer Psalm 119 Radical Jesus 101 Reviews Sermon on the Mount Sermons Spanish Bible study Special Series Spiritual but not religious Synchroblog Theology Things that made me think Thomas a Kempis Ugliness Into Beauty Uncategorized Viaje Dominicano 2013 Walking in the Valley (Lent) Welcome: It's More than a Mat Wild Goose 2013 Wrestling

Select a Month March 2022 January 2022 December 2021 September 2021 April 2021 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many disciples did Jesus have?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Seven Twelve Twenty Ten