Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Mercy Not Sacrifice

Home
About
My Book
Archives
More
- Theology
- Culture
- Politics
- Sermons
- Bible
- Devotions
- Daily Office
- Podcast

Home
Progressive Christian
Interruption, Ideology, and Truth

Interruption, Ideology, and Truth

Last updated on: July 17, 2014 at 2:17 pm by Morgan Guyton

Interruption, Ideology, and Truth 2014-07-17T14:17:48-05:00 Morgan Guyton

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Amos Yong at the Missio Alliance talked today about “the phenemonology of interruption” in Pentecost. Interruption is how God expresses His sovereignty. Humanity muddles along in our reality that we can’t imagine being any other way, and events happen that do not fit “the way things are.” Our paradigms are shattered, and we are forced to grapple with the terror that Somebody greater than the projected Geist of our civilization has tinkered with us. Pentecost is the eternal event of the Spirit’s interruption. The opposite of Pentecost is ideology, the stasis of homogenized idolatrous “truth” that tries to substitute itself for God, what Slavoj Zizek calls “the big Other” and what Christians with a perspicuous (idolatrous) account of Biblical truth would call the “owner’s manual.”

Zizek has a concept (probably not original to him) that every truth is definitively a fiction. I’m sure it sounds like an obnoxious “relativist” thing to say, but stay with me. What it means is that any sentence we write to explain reality (a “truth”) is always only an approximation of what we’re talking about (a “fiction”). This is because reality is not finite, since our infinite Creator has flooded every object in His creation with infinite sacramental depth that proclaims His glory. So no sentence or even book however long can ever do justice to the truth of creation (if it really is the perpetual, dynamic artwork of an infinitely transcendent Creator).

Twenty years ago as a high school kid doing parachurch Bible study, I had drilled into me the notion that there are two sides when it comes to truth: team absolute truth and team relativism. “Relativism” heaped together hedonists with no ethical standards, people who think that believers of other religions aren’t necessarily going to hell, and people who think that it’s okay to negotiate with Democrats. “Absolute truth” means that because there’s one God, there’s one truth that we can find in the Bible, and the world around us is really real and not just a product of our imagination that everybody gets to have a different set of facts about.

There is a mischievous, cynical relativism in which people whose law is their belly, to use a Pauline expression, argue against any sense of authority or discipline for narcissistic, self-indulgent reasons. Sometimes this is called being a hippie, though it’s possible to be a hippie with principles. At the same time, “absolute truth” can easily become a commitment to the infallibility of my ability to appropriate truth, which is actually a claim that truth can’t be truth if it transcends my comprehension, thus making me or whichever authoritative interpreter I submit to absolutely my idol.

The question is whether it’s okay with me for truth that I cannot ever understand completely to exist. I may have a medium for accessing it like the testimony passed down from the people who knew the divine man who was Truth, but if He is who He says He is, then we can never explain everything about Him exhaustively. For the Bible to serve its proper function, we must see its testimony as an icon that points to truth rather than a finite set of content that we can seize, own completely, and control, which is the definition of idol. The medium is finite; the Truth to whom
it points is not. Jesus didn’t say the Bible is the way, the truth, and the life; He is. Paul said that Jesus breathes through the Bible; He breathes through other things too and we’re better able to decipher what He’s saying in other contexts if we’re thinking in the poetry God gives us through scripture.

This is different than the idolatrous view of the Bible as an “owner’s manual.” Owner’s manuals are supposed to be a finite, exhaustive set of self-evident content; they exist to preclude the need for calling a live “tech support” person and asking for guidance. Owner’s manuals are intended to replace relationships. A collection of words by itself is a finite medium for learning something that you move beyond; a relationship is an infinite medium for perpetual learning; it is only the relationship with the author or interpreting community that gives any book infinite meaning by offering an infinite depth of interpretive possibility.

When a community is operating under an idolatrous notion of truth as “owner’s manual,” its belief system becomes ideological and reductionist, its teaching is no longer about discovering new depths but about policing conformity. Those who do the policing are the true sovereigns in this ideological community, not the God they supposedly worship. The living water of infinite truth is boiled down until only sand remains.

How does God regain His sovereignty in such a community? By interrupting it through the Pentecostal outpouring of the Holy Spirit on “sons and daughters who testify” (Joel 2:28). God interrupts us through the prophecy of people whose testimony has no merit according to our existing conventions. A question I put out on twitter as Yong was talking is whether others think that today’s Pentecostal interruption has a queer feel to it (as opposed to the “masculine feel” John Piper gave Christianity). Unsurprisingly no one responded.

I do wonder though if God’s purpose for the homosexuality debate in our culture is to rescue Christians from the idolatrous, perspicuous approach to the Bible driven by the sovereignty needs of conformity police whose faces light up Jumbotrons in satellite campuses idolatrously where people watch with whom they will never have relationships. Tim Keller said that exploring a way for queer Christians to live chaste and holy but not necessarily celibate, disembodied lives would require throwing out everything about the way he reads the Bible. Sounds like a Pentecostal interruption to me.

Previous Post

April 12, 2013

Airplane evangelism: Rachel Held Evans vs. Ray Comfort

Next Post

April 13, 2013 Removing the linchpin of Christian hate

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Advent Beauty Will Save the World Bible Big Picture: Ephesians Bloggers Book Christian salvation and the Beautitudes Culture Daily Office Danceable Homiletics Deadly Sins Deep Roots: Genesis Devotions Dominican Republic May 2011 El Principio Misericordia (The Mercy Principle) Five verses God tattooed on my heart Fundraising FutureGospel Good Biblical Words Henri Nouwen Interview Jennings' Christian Imagination Jesus inside the beltway Jesus Is My Candidate Jesus vs the Pharisees Jesus vs. Plato Journey to Eternity Looking Back on 2012 Love Actually Monday Merton Monday Merton Music Occupy the manger On Earth As It Is In Heaven Original Sin Podcast Poetry Politics Prayer Psalm 119 Radical Jesus 101 Reviews Sermon on the Mount Sermons Spanish Bible study Special Series Spiritual but not religious Synchroblog Theology Things that made me think Thomas a Kempis Ugliness Into Beauty Uncategorized Viaje Dominicano 2013 Walking in the Valley (Lent) Welcome: It's More than a Mat Wild Goose 2013 Wrestling

Select a Month March 2022 January 2022 December 2021 September 2021 April 2021 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

To whom does Paul say he has become all things so that by all possible means he might save some?

Select your answer to see how you score.

The weak The Jews Everyone The Gentiles