Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Mercy Not Sacrifice

Home
About
My Book
Archives
More
- Theology
- Culture
- Politics
- Sermons
- Bible
- Devotions
- Daily Office
- Podcast

Home
Progressive Christian
Engaging Spiritual but not Religious #1: God is a three-letter word

Engaging Spiritual but not Religious #1: God is a three-letter word

Last updated on: July 17, 2014 at 2:25 pm by Morgan Guyton

Engaging Spiritual but not Religious #1: God is a three-letter word 2014-07-17T14:25:31-05:00 Morgan Guyton

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

We’re starting a sermon series this weekend called “Spiritual not religious.” I’ve been a little bit sheepish to share this on my blog, since it’s about as cool in Christian circles as being a Vanilla Ice fan in 1994. Hating on “spiritual but not religious” people is obligatory in the Christian blogosphere. I’ve done it; everyone has. But I thought about trying a different approach. I googled the phrase “I am spiritual but not religious” and a site came up with testimonies of people who identify that way. So I figured I would start a series engaging some of these testimonies on somewhat neutral metaphysical ground instead of just making fun of the label in order to prove my legitimacy to other Christians.

I. “God is a three letter word”

This is an interesting poem that sounds like it’s written to be read aloud at a poetry slam. Its essential claim is a sort of pantheism:

When I say god, really do mean
Our mission control; godhead divinity
The creator of which we all comprise
Created out of love; shouldn’t surprise

So according to this author, there’s a creator who represents a sort of collective consciousness that we’re all part of. This is basically a popularized version of the German philosopher G.W.F. Hegel’s concept of geist, the God who discovers Himself over time through the history of humanity.

The author goes on to critique religious practice, saying:

People think they need a sacred space
To connect with all of the divines grace
Which has always been inside of you
To guide, inspire and lift your blues

So “godness” is something we have to discover within ourselves. The author doesn’t want “divine grace” to be something that you can only access by going to a “sacred space.” It appears that the biggest problem he has is with the concept of an intermediary, which comes out plainly in the final stanza:

Please don’t think you need
To connect with god, someone in-between
Your connected anyway all of the time
Church is inside you not with bread and wine

The author doesn’t like there being a “someone in-between.” The reference to “bread and wine” sounds like he is reacting against a high church liturgical background, which would presumably include a hierarchical bureaucracy that serves as the “someone in-between.”

II. My response:

I can appreciate the sentiments that are expressed by this author. They are somewhat analogous to the concept of the “priesthood of the believer” that is an important doctrine in the Protestant tradition as a rebellion against the need for clerical intermediaries between us and God. I hear in this poem a longing to “connect” with God; the word “connect” is repeated three times just in the excerpts I quoted. I do think the poet is reacting against a legitimate misconception that God is a distant outsider in our world rather than being immediately omnipresent everywhere.

However, I would feel very lonely and anxious if this poem were the only spiritual resource I had available. While I can agree that God exists “inside of” me (“The kingdom of God is within you,” Luke 17:21), if God is not also beyond me, then that’s a lot of pressure on me to be my own god and make a universe all by myself. It’s tremendously intimidating to read the poem say: “Go today and use the power you have, the power of god in your very own hands.”

I don’t think I could ever feel powerful on my own. I’m way too anxious and easily distracted and emotionally fragile. One of the most comforting verses in the Bible for me is what God tells Paul when he is frustrated with his inadequacies, “My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in your weakness” (2 Corinthians 12:9). Because I feel secure in the divine power from beyond me, I can stand up in front of a group of people and preach for 20 minutes without notes on a subject which I have thought about plenty but haven’t hammered out into a verbatim manuscript in advance.

Another challenge I would raise has to do with “connecting to divine grace.” Does every individual person really have to figure out how to do this on their own? If I were completely on my own, I wouldn’t know what to do, so I probably wouldn’t do anything. What if one person figures out a way of connecting to divine grace that gives that person tremendous peace and confidence and then others hear about it and become disciples of that person? Then whatever set of techniques that person proposes is a religion in which there is “sacred space” or at least a distinction between things you do to connect to divine grace and things you do for other reasons.

My final concern has to do with the energy it would take to convince myself that I have “the power of god in my very own hands.” It would seem to me that interpreting my world in this way would force me to hide from my mistakes and manifestations of weakness in order to preserve a perpetual state of optimism and elevated level of self-esteem. That just feels like it would take a lot of energy and make me defensive and insecure.

When I was clinically depressed, the fact that I didn’t have a legitimate reason for my unhappiness was the primary source of the infinite loop by which I remained depressed. I had a lot of people try to cheer me up by saying the equivalent of “You have the power of god in your hands.” It only discouraged me more because what it said to me was that if I weren’t such a loser, I would immediately see their point and smile and be done with depression.

I need a church that isn’t just “inside me” because I need to be touched and loved by God through other people. The time when I feel the deepest connection with God every week is when I stand in the front of my church and tear off pieces of communion bread and look into the eyes of several dozen different people. That moment is an amazing intimacy that I could not live without. So this is where I am, anyway. If you happen to be a “spiritual but not religious” person, I would be honored to receive your feedback, push-back, criticism, or whatever. I hope that the way I have written is respectful and accessible. Blessings.

Special Series

Spiritual but not religious

Spiritual but not religious

Spiritual not religious

Spirituality

Previous Post

January 8, 2013

Frantz Fanon and Isaiah 61

Next Post

January 10, 2013 Original sin, part two: 1 Corinthians 15:22 and Ephesians 2:3

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Advent Beauty Will Save the World Bible Big Picture: Ephesians Bloggers Book Christian salvation and the Beautitudes Culture Daily Office Danceable Homiletics Deadly Sins Deep Roots: Genesis Devotions Dominican Republic May 2011 El Principio Misericordia (The Mercy Principle) Five verses God tattooed on my heart Fundraising FutureGospel Good Biblical Words Henri Nouwen Interview Jennings' Christian Imagination Jesus inside the beltway Jesus Is My Candidate Jesus vs the Pharisees Jesus vs. Plato Journey to Eternity Looking Back on 2012 Love Actually Monday Merton Monday Merton Music Occupy the manger On Earth As It Is In Heaven Original Sin Podcast Poetry Politics Prayer Psalm 119 Radical Jesus 101 Reviews Sermon on the Mount Sermons Spanish Bible study Special Series Spiritual but not religious Synchroblog Theology Things that made me think Thomas a Kempis Ugliness Into Beauty Uncategorized Viaje Dominicano 2013 Walking in the Valley (Lent) Welcome: It's More than a Mat Wild Goose 2013 Wrestling

Select a Month March 2022 January 2022 December 2021 September 2021 April 2021 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What nation took Israel into captivity in 722 BC?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Assyria Persia Egypt Babylon