“Are you not going to answer?”

Last updated on: July 17, 2014 at 2:28 pm by Morgan Guyton

“Are you not going to answer?” 2014-07-17T14:28:53-05:00 Morgan Guyton

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I don’t plan on watching any of the presidential debates because honestly the whole concept makes me sick. I am so weary of argument being the central trope upon which our society is built. How many people were either gleeful or bitter when they walked around work yesterday based on whether they were pulling for Mitt or Barack? Think about how ridiculous that is. A world built on arguments becomes a post-truth world in which there need not be any correspondence between an argument that a person makes and the reality on the ground as long as the argument is plausible and logically coherent. Every debate is won by the one with the best delivery, so that a confident liar can beat a stuttering, conflicted person of integrity. Nobody cares what the fact-checkers have to say. They’re like the refs who call fouls every 30 seconds and get beer thrown on them by fans who scream, “Just let them play ball!” I wonder if this is what it felt like in Athens when Plato was writing about the sophists. In any case, it made me think of the time when Jesus stood before the Sanhedrin after having all sorts of attacks made against him: “Then the high priest stood up and said to Jesus, ‘Are you not going to answer? What is this testimony that these men are bringing against you?’ But Jesus remained silent” (Matthew 26:62-63). So here’s my question: when are Christians supposed to argue and when are we supposed to be silent?

It seems like the default for Christians, particularly those who are pompous enough to become bloggers like me, is to say that we’re always supposed to argue because if someone says something that isn’t right, then unless we challenge it, other people might believe it, and before you know it, the truth will vanish from the face of the Earth. We cite verses like 1 Peter 3:15, “Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have.” And so we eagerly await the opportunity to use our apologetic and evangelistic expertise to smack others down when they contradict the truth that we have. Of course, we often forget to read the rest of verse 15 and verse 16: “But do this with gentleness and respect, keeping a clear conscience, so that those who speak maliciously against your good behavior in Christ may be ashamed of their slander.”

What would it be like if we owned the challenge of speaking so gently and respectfully that anyone who spoke maliciously against us would be ashamed of their slander? This is completely different than shaming them for their slander. It is something that cannot be accomplished through logic, which modernity has taught us to worship above all else. Many Christians today love logic more than they love Jesus Himself. But speaking gently and respectfully has to do with beauty, not logic. The hope that we have is supposed to be an enchanting garden whose aroma lures people in, not a fortress of perfect irrefutability whose archers are ready with a flock of arrows to launch in rebuttal to any challenge.

Jesus wasn’t always silent. He was silent when there was no chance of accomplishing metanoia (that form of epiphany translated as “repentance”) in His listeners. He playfully argued with the Pharisees who took themselves a lot more seriously than He did. He did lash out at quite a few people harshly, but it was always either for the purpose of shaking a realization out of them or in order to express solidarity with someone else*.* Simon the Pharisee got schooled on his hospitality because of the way that he scorned the poor prostitute washing Jesus’ feet. The teacher of the law who wants to know how to love his neighbor gets pricked by having the despised Palestinian (er… Samaritan) be the hero of the story. Jesus had to call Peter “Satan” so he would stop being a !@#$%^&*. When Jesus excoriates the Pharisees in Matthew 23 in the harshest speech he ever gave, it’s clear that He’s speaking out of solidarity with the people who are having “the gate of heaven slammed in their faces” and having “heavy loads tied for them to carry.”

There was always a purpose when Jesus argued with and dissed people. But when it became about defending Himself against enemies who were completely hardened in their views, Jesus had nothing to say. As 1 Peter 2:23 says, “When they hurled their insults at him, he did not retaliate; when he suffered, he made no threats. Instead, he entrusted himself to him who judges justly.” So think about this as you consider your conversations with other people. The more that you love the strength of your own logic, the more that you are mocking the foolish weakness of our savior whose cross was utterly ridiculous and pathetic before it became a piece of jewelry and something you could make a million bucks writing pop love songs about. If we have indeed taken up our crosses to follow Jesus, then their foolishness should be a constant source of humility for us. True self-denial is not taking pride in conspicuously arduous self-sacrifice and toil; it is rather having the humility to let somebody else get the last word.

I have had some amazing conversations with a brilliant reformed pastor named Derek Rishmawy over the past year. We disagree over the fundamental chasm that divides the Wesleyan from the Calvinist. But our conversations have been so much more than debates. And there is so much more overlap and agreement in our perspectives than I thought there would be. Because of the gentleness and respect with which Derek writes, I feel like a jerk every time I crucify straw men or dump a red herring in what I say. Another blogger who is a master of gentleness and respect is my fellow Methodist John Meunier. John is a generation older than me in some of his social views which has lit my fuse a few times. But he is so humble in a way that seems like it cannot be disingenuous that God uses his responses to my outbursts to throw heaps of burning coals on my head and teach me temperance of speech.

By all means, be prepared to give an answer for the hope that you have. But make it a beautiful answer instead of a logically impenetrable one. If someone wants to argue and it seems like they might really be asking for help with an issue they’re struggling with, then engage but do so gently. But if Satan’s trolls come around to heckle and taunt you, then you don’t need to say a word in reply because the cross to which they nail you to is the proof of their defeat.

Previous Post

October 4, 2012

What it all boils down to for me

Next Post

October 5, 2012 Pulpit Freedom vs. World Communion: A Solomonic Choice

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Advent Beauty Will Save the World Bible Big Picture: Ephesians Bloggers Book Christian salvation and the Beautitudes Culture Daily Office Danceable Homiletics Deadly Sins Deep Roots: Genesis Devotions Dominican Republic May 2011 El Principio Misericordia (The Mercy Principle) Five verses God tattooed on my heart Fundraising FutureGospel Good Biblical Words Henri Nouwen Interview Jennings' Christian Imagination Jesus inside the beltway Jesus Is My Candidate Jesus vs the Pharisees Jesus vs. Plato Journey to Eternity Looking Back on 2012 Love Actually Monday Merton Monday Merton Music Occupy the manger On Earth As It Is In Heaven Original Sin Podcast Poetry Politics Prayer Psalm 119 Radical Jesus 101 Reviews Sermon on the Mount Sermons Spanish Bible study Special Series Spiritual but not religious Synchroblog Theology Things that made me think Thomas a Kempis Ugliness Into Beauty Uncategorized Viaje Dominicano 2013 Walking in the Valley (Lent) Welcome: It's More than a Mat Wild Goose 2013 Wrestling

Select a Month March 2022 January 2022 December 2021 September 2021 April 2021 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: David committed adultery with Bathsheba and arranged for her husband Uriah to be killed.

Select your answer to see how you score.

FALSE TRUE