Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Mercy Not Sacrifice

Home
About
My Book
Archives
More
- Theology
- Culture
- Politics
- Sermons
- Bible
- Devotions
- Daily Office
- Podcast

Home
Progressive Christian
One State for Israel and Palestine

One State for Israel and Palestine

Last updated on: July 17, 2014 at 2:40 pm by Morgan Guyton

One State for Israel and Palestine 2014-07-17T14:40:17-05:00 Morgan Guyton

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Nothing is more agonizing and emblematic of the nihilistic helplessness of modern diplomacy than the Israeli/Palestinian conflict. I can totally understand Mahmoud Abbas going to the United Nations to petition for statehood. It’s obviously going to get vetoed by the US, but I’m perplexed that anyone could criticize him for trying something different than a process which has gone nowhere for as long as I’ve been alive.

I suppose you could oppose Abbas’s move on the grounds that all Palestinians are terrorists by nature, but I refuse to consider any depiction of this messy and morally complicated conflict that depends upon damning a whole race of people. Many Palestinians are actually Christian, not that it should matter. The question of what’s fair to Jews and Arabs alike has to be considered in complete independence from the false “math” of who’s done more wrong to the other side (which actually tilts radically in the Palestinians’ favor if you’re talking about innocent civilians who have been killed).

There’s no incentive for Benjamin Netanyahu to come to peace with Palestinians because that means facing the wrath of his settler population who make the shrillest voices in American politics look tame. There’s no incentive for Barack Obama to say or do anything that can be construed as less than absolute, uncritical support for Israel because doing so would cost him the presidential election. The Palestinians are the only ones who have any incentive to pursue any kind of change in the situation because their lives suck completely right now.

Whatever else is true, Palestinians, especially in the Gaza strip, are living in worse than Third World conditions. The unemployment rate is something like 2/3 of the population. Israel’s siege of Gaza is creating a whole new generation of Palestinians who have nothing to live for, and people who have nothing to live for only have something to die for. They can’t wait around like Netanyahu can. That’s why Abbas had no choice but to do something in order to hang onto whatever thread of political legitimacy he still has.

And yet, there is a completely different route that the Palestinians could take. They could demand equal rights as Israeli citizens through nonviolent protest. If they’re willing to sacrifice their demands for their own independent state, that removes all of the current barriers to negotiation. Then the Israeli settlers wouldn’t have to move. All the jockeying over east Jerusalem, right of return, etc, would evaporate. They could set immigration quotas for emigrated Jews and Palestinians in the diaspora at an equal level that’s sustainable within the small territory that they have. I know this sounds utterly crazy. How could two races who have been this at odds live together in peace?

But it’s happening right now (more or less) in the land where I live, not just between enemies, but even more radically between descendants of slaves and descendants of their masters. 100 years ago in the South, white terrorists in the Ku Klux Klan could lynch black people with impunity. Black people in the South for most of its history have lived under a reign of terror (and some would argue that black youth are still guilty until proven innocent when they’re on the sidewalks at night). There’s still plenty of racism, but we don’t have barbed wire fences and sniper towers separating white neighborhoods from black neighborhoods. All this is just to say (hopefully without offending everyone reading this for different reasons) that the integrated society we have today would have been unimaginable to people in the Fifties.

If the Palestinians and the Israelis who are interested in peace unified around a single demand for one state with equal rights for all, it would be very hard to oppose that demand. Terrorists have the upper hand in a society with 70% unemployment where the only interactions you have with the “other side” is with soldiers holding machine guns who frisk your grandmother at checkpoints, but a society where Jews and Arabs go to the same schools, play on the same sports teams, and shop at the same businesses would completely undermine that power dynamic.

Would there be some racialized fights in the hallways at school for the first decade or longer? Certainly. Would there be some vandalism of the other sides’ businesses? Probably. But terrorism would be a crime that every citizen would have an investment in stomping out. And I really believe that the overwhelming relief and gratitude for the end of a lifetime of misery would be incentive enough for a vast majority of people to say, “We are absolutely not going to let the haters take us back to the way that we were!”

The main difference between the American South and Israel and Palestine is that we changed because we had to. There’s no “have to” for Israel and Palestine. Netanyahu has his hands tied by his crazy settlers; Hamas’s ideology depends upon Israel staying an enemy forever. The only way to create a “have to” in Israel and Palestine is for the US, UN, the Arab League, and whoever else gives money to both sides to give them a concrete absolute deadline, saying, “You fix this or we’ll cut off all foreign aid.” Without the purse-strings getting pulled, there will never be a “have to.” There are too many factors that assure perpetual inertia otherwise.

I know it sounds naive and overly simplistic. It would certainly be a messy, painful process, but how could it possibly not be better than the “two-state” bridge to nowhere which has been a total failure? If the US were somehow involved in not only creating peace but helping the Israelis and Palestinians become an integrated society, that would be the biggest game-changer imaginable in terms of our relationship to the Arab world.

Of course, there’s a sizable bloc of people in the US who don’t want peace in the Middle East because peace would mean that they won’t get raptured out of their miserable dead-end cubicle jobs when Armageddon strikes. I want Jesus to come back too, but as Amos 5:18 says, “Why do you long for the day of the LORD? That day will be darkness, not light.” People who hate peace shouldn’t assume that Jesus is going to run up and hug them when He returns. In any case, I prefer the hopeful vision of Isaiah 2:

In days to come, the Lord’s mountain will be established as the highest of mountains. It will be exalted above the hills, and all nations will stream to it. Many peoples will come and say, ‘Come, let us go up to the mountain of the LORD, to the temple of the God of Jacob. He will teach us his ways, so that we may walk in his paths.’ The law will go out from Zion, the word of the LORD from Jerusalem. He will judge between the nations and will settle disputes for many peoples. They will beat their swords into plowshares and their spears into pruning hooks. Nation will not take up sword against nation, nor will they train for war anymore.

I suppose this prophecy is a bit boring for people who love violent video games and prefer the fire and brimstone of the book of Revelation, but it’s in the Bible for a reason and I’m going to hold onto the hope that it gives me.

Previous Post

September 21, 2011

Creating a culture of life against ideology & capital

Next Post

September 25, 2011 When Welcome is a Problem

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Advent Beauty Will Save the World Bible Big Picture: Ephesians Bloggers Book Christian salvation and the Beautitudes Culture Daily Office Danceable Homiletics Deadly Sins Deep Roots: Genesis Devotions Dominican Republic May 2011 El Principio Misericordia (The Mercy Principle) Five verses God tattooed on my heart Fundraising FutureGospel Good Biblical Words Henri Nouwen Interview Jennings' Christian Imagination Jesus inside the beltway Jesus Is My Candidate Jesus vs the Pharisees Jesus vs. Plato Journey to Eternity Looking Back on 2012 Love Actually Monday Merton Monday Merton Music Occupy the manger On Earth As It Is In Heaven Original Sin Podcast Poetry Politics Prayer Psalm 119 Radical Jesus 101 Reviews Sermon on the Mount Sermons Spanish Bible study Special Series Spiritual but not religious Synchroblog Theology Things that made me think Thomas a Kempis Ugliness Into Beauty Uncategorized Viaje Dominicano 2013 Walking in the Valley (Lent) Welcome: It's More than a Mat Wild Goose 2013 Wrestling

Select a Month March 2022 January 2022 December 2021 September 2021 April 2021 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does the name "Delilah" likely mean?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Beloved Beautiful Delicate Wise