Fe temporal vs. fe salvador: Spanish Bible study adventures #1

Last updated on: July 17, 2014 at 2:58 pm by Morgan Guyton

Fe temporal vs. fe salvador: Spanish Bible study adventures #1 2014-07-17T14:58:44-05:00 Morgan Guyton

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I have started leading a Wednesday morning Bible study in Spanish at the Lamb Center, a homeless drop-in center in Fairfax, VA. We have been going through the book of Ephesians since it’s fairly short and super-rich theologically. It’s very interesting to lead a Bible study in a different language where I understand about half of what is being said by the other participants. They’ve been very talkative, which is awesome, but they’ll sometimes share long personal stories that I lose track of. Thankfully I am accompanied each week by Maritza Monsalvo, the wife of Pastor Medardo Serrano who leads the Spanish congregation that meets at Burke UMC on Saturdays. It usually isn’t until the drive home when we debrief and I learn what in the world we actually talked about.

This morning we had four guys with us: Alejandro, Candelario, Jose, and Rubelio. Rubelio is the most alpha male that we’ve had in Bible study so far. He probably talked about 40 minutes, I talked maybe 10, and the rest of the group talked the other ten. Rubelio says that he thinks he’s called to be a street preacher. Usually when people at homeless shelters say that (which is common), I start waiting for them to say something “schizophrenic.” But because of my lack of complete fluency in Spanish, I can’t listen as easily for the tip-off phrases that help me mentally categorize other people. Also in working class Latino culture, talking about wrestling with demons and other supernatural phenomena is entirely within psychologically normal discourse. So my linguistic helplessness actually helps me to treat these homeless guys like regular people instead of falling into a paternalistic provider/client duality.

One of the challenges of facilitating the conversation is that I was focusing so much energy on understanding what Rubelio was saying that I couldn’t figure out how to break in when he had completed his thought and pass the baton to someone else. My tendency in Bible study situations is to affirm the positives in what I hear somebody else say even if I disagree with them and state back what I heard making theologically appropriate edits as necessary. It also helps me figure out if I completely mistranslated something. One stressor for me was that I heard Rubelio telling other guys that what they were saying was wrong when from my elementary school level fluency I didn’t hear any distinction between the pious evangelico platitudes he was saying and they were saying.

Part of our debate (I think?) was around the question of faith (fe) because we read one of my favorite passages Ephesians 2:7-8 that frames justification by faith perfectly in my opinion: “For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God— not by works, so that no one can boast. For we are God’s handiwork, created in Christ Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do.” The great thing about this passage is that it shows that there are two purposes of justification by faith: it 1) keeps us from boasting so that 2) we can do good works. When our energy is used up boasting about our righteousness, we can’t do God’s work.

Unfortunately (from my perspective) the discussion didn’t stay there. I guess it’s a pretty abstract bourgeois gringo concern to point out that God justifies us by faith so that all those self-righteous fundamentalists will sit down and shut up. Homeless Hispanic guys are more interested in whether they will get hired to do day labor if they prayed to God vigorously and sincerely enough. It sounded like Rubelio was trying to argue that when we pray with faith, God will do anything, but if what you pray for doesn’t happen, then it means you didn’t have faith. Alejandro said something that sounded perfectly pious to me and Rubelio said no, you’re wrong.

Thankfully, Maritza busted in. She explained that there are three distinctive forms of faith: fe historica, believing that something happened even though we weren’t there to see it, like Cristobal Colon discovering the new world; fe temporal, believing that something good will happen to us like getting a job or healing from a sickness; and then fe salvador, which has to do with trusting God enough to open our hearts and minds to Him. It was a very helpful distinction, a good corrective to the “name it and claim it” crap that prosperity gospel practitioners preach.

Candelario was being a devil’s advocate so he said nobody really has that kind of faith. Just look at Peter who denied Jesus three times or Moses who smacked the rock when God told him to talk to it to get water to come out. (Side note: how come homeless Hispanic guys know more obscure Bible stories than most “educated” white people?) So I had us turn to Mark 9 where the father of the epileptic is pleading with Jesus to heal his son and he says, “Lord, I believe; help me in my unbelief!” I said that’s what faith looks like. It’s not the absence of doubt. It’s having hearts that are open enough to confess our doubts to God and ask for His help. Then I took us to Augustine’s favorite psalm, #42, which describes our quest for seeking God in terms of a thirsty deer racing through the woods to find a stream to drink from. I told them that fe just means having a sed eterna (eternal thirst). As long as we’re thirsty, we’re good. As soon as we stop being thirsty, that’s when we’ve lost our faith.

At the end when we asked for peticiones, Alejandro said that he had been living in fe temporal and wanted to have a fe permanente. I’m not sure if that constitutes praying Jesus into his heart, which I wouldn’t necessarily know how to do in Spanish, but it was okay because Maritza does the closing prayer. Overall, it was a rich conversation. Maritza suggested that next time we put time limits on each person’s commentario. I think I agree.

Previous Post

August 2, 2011

It was good for me to be afflicted: Monster-Psalm Meditation #9

Next Post

August 3, 2011 Where I agree with Mark Driscoll: Judgment As Solidarity

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Advent Beauty Will Save the World Bible Big Picture: Ephesians Bloggers Book Christian salvation and the Beautitudes Culture Daily Office Danceable Homiletics Deadly Sins Deep Roots: Genesis Devotions Dominican Republic May 2011 El Principio Misericordia (The Mercy Principle) Five verses God tattooed on my heart Fundraising FutureGospel Good Biblical Words Henri Nouwen Interview Jennings' Christian Imagination Jesus inside the beltway Jesus Is My Candidate Jesus vs the Pharisees Jesus vs. Plato Journey to Eternity Looking Back on 2012 Love Actually Monday Merton Monday Merton Music Occupy the manger On Earth As It Is In Heaven Original Sin Podcast Poetry Politics Prayer Psalm 119 Radical Jesus 101 Reviews Sermon on the Mount Sermons Spanish Bible study Special Series Spiritual but not religious Synchroblog Theology Things that made me think Thomas a Kempis Ugliness Into Beauty Uncategorized Viaje Dominicano 2013 Walking in the Valley (Lent) Welcome: It's More than a Mat Wild Goose 2013 Wrestling

Select a Month March 2022 January 2022 December 2021 September 2021 April 2021 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

According to Romans 3:23, who has sinned?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Those who do not accept Christ The Gentiles Only those who break the Ten Commandments Everyone