Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Mark Van Steenwyk

The Pathology of Liberal* Spirituality

Last updated on: April 9, 2019 at 6:06 pm   by Mark Van Steenwyk

The Pathology of Liberal* Spirituality 2019-04-09T18:06:18-05:00 Mark Van Steenwyk

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

One pathology of political liberalism is to equate calmness with maturity and anger with immaturity. Many who have been enculturated as middle class liberals (particularly the white ones) may shed tears for injustice, but don’t get too riled up about injustice. And so, when they come into contact with an angry poor person, or angry person of color, it is easy for them to think: “Well, I certainly care about injustice, but I don’t get worked up about it…these folks are behaving like children!”

This tendency gets spiritualized as such folks go to nice liberal churches where the homilist never raises their voice as they calmly read their written reflections. And when they prioritize silent spiritual practices and read (or perhaps misread) authors like Richard Rohr or other writers that encourage a sort of anti-dualism. They conclude that calling anything “evil” is just some sort of immature form of spirituality. At a certain point, out of a paternal or maternal compassion, they go forth to help the angry oppressed mature spiritually, as they did. They quote MLK and Gandhi and Jesus (or at least the nicer bits) to remind everyone of the better angels in our nature. They lift up nonviolence as a virtue whenever voices cry too loudly for justice. Deep down inside, they know that if we can come together in civility and vulnerability, we can figure this out. But first these angry folks have to let go in the spirit of reconciliation. This reminds me of an old tweet from Zellie Imani reminding us that calls for nonviolence from the privileged to the oppressed are fraught:

For the oppressor, “peace” isn’t the absence of violence. For the oppressor, “peace” is the absence of response to their violence.

— zellie (@zellieimani) September 4, 2016

Context matters. Pacifism and nonviolence ONLY make sense when they are developed among folks who would otherwise see violence as the reasonable course of action. A prescriptive nonviolence that comes from comfortable oppressors is worse than worthless. It usually reinforces the status quo. A spirituality centered on silence and detachment can be powerful. But, again, these practices only really make sense within the context of solidarity. When we are pathologically disengaged or prone to political apathy, contemplative practice becomes problematic. If we habitually avoid the oppressed and become, therefore, inattentive to those who suffer, our practices will become a spritualized buffer. Please understand. I’m not rejecting nonviolence and contemplation. I am a mystic, a contemplative, and a pacifist. In my life and work, I advocate a contemplative posture in the quest for spiritual and political liberation. Nevertheless, many of us learn contemplation and nonviolence in a way that wittingly enshrines a sort of disengaged white middle class consciousness. Unfortunately, so many advocates of contemplation and nonviolence fail to recognize this problem. Instead, they seem to operate from the assumption that, merely by doing contemplation, people will simply wake from their slumber to the pulsating world of reality and become aware of the nature of oppression. But this is impossible without real compassionate solidarity with those who suffer. The key words here are “compassionate” which (at root) means to “suffer with” and “solidarity” which basically means “to be bound together.” Without suffering with the oppressed, and being bound together in the struggle for liberation, contemplative spirituality and nonviolent politics are dead.


*”Liberal” is a contested term. For more of what I have in mind, read my recent post Liberal/Leftist/Progressive/Radical: What do they mean?

Blog

nonviolence

Politics

spirituality

Previous Post



March 13, 2019

The Program in Prophetic Spirituality

Next Post



March 25, 2019 Hate is Big Business in America


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Anarchism Bible Blog Commentary Empire formation Hospitality Jesus Money nonviolence podcast Politics Prayer Protest Sexuality spirituality theology Worship

Select a Month September 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 November 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 May 2016 April 2016 January 2016 December 2015 July 2014 February 2014 December 2013 August 2013 July 2013 January 2013 December 2012 October 2012


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which brother's descendants would be kings according to Jacob's blessing?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Reuben Dan Levi Judah

Related posts from Mark Van Steenwyk

Progressive Christian

The more you work for justice, the more...

Mark Van Steenwyk

Progressive Christian

Jesus and the Way of Compassion

Mark Van Steenwyk

Progressive Christian

David Platt, Donald Trump, and the Need for...

Mark Van Steenwyk

Progressive Christian

Jesus and the Wilderness Tradition

Mark Van Steenwyk

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Progressive Christian

Prayer for the Earth, to the Earth

What if we asked the Earth to pray for us? This lyrical...

An Insightful Look at Age-Gap Relationships in Scripture

If you've paid any attention to social media over the past 20...

Was God Silent for 400 Years, or Just...

God’s Global Footprints Across the Ages: How the Creator Has Always Been on...

Brandy Anderson, Team Weird, and Transcending Church

I met author Brandy Anderson on Heretic Happy Hour, when podcaster Keith...

Why Christians Have a Sacred Duty to Vote:...

The Bible offers strong support for the sacred duty to vote. Here...

What Being a Modern-Day Apostle Means to Me

In my last column, I discussed the ins and outs of modern-day...

view all Progressive Christian blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube