When Priests Attack

Last updated on: May 7, 2019 at 7:01 am by Mark Shea

When Priests Attack 2019-05-07T07:01:25-07:00 Mark Shea

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

So last week, Jimmy Akin offered a typically lucid critique of the absurd letter charging the Holy Father with heresy. It was, I thought, a brave thing to do since the subculture that it was both created by and addressed to is, in large measure, the subculture that reads the National Catholic Register, for whom Jimmy wrote the critique. My fear was that this subculture would lash out at him instead of listening to him.

Alas, my fear was not unfounded. The comboxes at the Register are bulging with screeds attacking him with the beloved insult “ultramontanist” (a term which now means “somebody who does not call the pope a heretic for using a ferula”). What is particularly striking are the priests showing up to attack a layperson for speaking on behalf of the pope against these crazy charges and, in particular, none other than Father George Rutler, one of the signers of the letter, who writes:

Posted by George W. Rutler on Friday, May, 3, 2019 1:53 PM (EDT):
I have been asked to respond to Mr. “Jimmy” Akins’s criticism of the scholarly statement imputing heresy to the Holy Father, and which Akins calls “loopy.” One is surprised that such a screed, which engages the pedantry of an amateur, was published in the National Catholic Register. While prescinding from any judgment about the juridical force of that scholarly statement, which may be frail in the case of a Sovereign Pontiff, the content of the document speaks for itself and strikes me as considerable if not even irrefutable. Noting among the signatories some figures I know and even highly esteem, I was amused to see that they are dismissed as incompetent and unqualified by “Jimmy” Akins. I am unfamiliar with this man, but from what information I could find, he is from the scenic Ozarks,likes being photographed in a cowboy hat, and advertises himself as a “Catholic apologist” while apparently shy of mentioning any academic credentials beyond one year in an unnamed college. Nonetheless, his efforts seem to be well-intentioned, and for them he receives an impressive income. However, I am moved to defend a man who needs no defense since he is one of the most distinguished theologians in the English-speaking world: Father Aidan Nichols. Perhaps “Jimmy” Akins would be willing to debate Father Nichols in that distinguished Dominican’s alma mater, the University of Oxford -the only requirements being that the debate be in the Latin with which Father Nichols is adroit, and that “Jimmy” Akins not wear a cowboy hat.

The name for this fallacy is “ad hominem”. It is also sloppy since he cannot be bothered to spell Jimmy’s name right as he evades reply to the substance of Jimmy’s argument.

Jimmy replies to this empty, snobbish, and content-free “rebuttal” with grace and class on Facebook:

A recent combox remark by Fr. George Rutler brought a smile to my face. 🙂

He makes several factual mistakes (including the implication I have only a year of college) and shares a fantasy about me being in over my head in a debate.

Still, it’s not every day that a priest of the Archdiocese of New York who says he’s not familiar with me mocks my name, my appearance, and my cultural heritage.

You stay classy, Fr. “George” Rutlers!

What interests me about this shameful behavior by a priest is that I have seen it before from clerical celebrities and it is deeply harmful to their pastoral work. I know, because I have been the highly personal victim of it myself from other celebrity priests.

Here’s the deal: we laity look to priests for succor and mercy and help in trying to be faithful to Christ, not brutal public humiliations. When a priest–responding to some fanboi asking him to dress down a lay person as a worthless country hick not worth scraping off his shoe–behaves as Fr. Rutler has done here, he does not impress me as a defender of the Faith, nor as a good shepherd. He impresses me as a bully. Jimmy responds with clarity. Fr. Rutler responded with mockery, not of Jimmy’s argument, but of Jimmy, one of his flock. Jimmy is grownup enough to know that this is Fr. Rutler’s fault, not Christ’s verdict on his soul.

But not every member of Christ’s lay faithful people is able to endure such haughty contempt from a priest. Some are driven away, never to return. God shield them from Fr. Rutler if he decides to do this one of Christ’s little ones.

Lots of Jimmy’s readers responded with variations on “This is so unlike Fr. Rutler.” Maybe. One reader wrote me, appalled but not shocked.

I read the post about Fr. George Rutler. Doesn’t surprise me at all.

When David Bowie died in January of 2016, he wrote the most horrible piece in Crisis about him. Of course a lot of people don’t care because they don’t care about famous people – but just look at this paragraph….

“Consequently, it was no surprise that news of the death of David Bowie was the first time I knew that he had been alive. If you find that hard to believe, you must remember that my instinctive taste for “pop music” is encoded by Gilbert and Sullivan and eclipsed by John Phillip Souza. What did surprise me was that the Vatican, just wiping up from its Climate Change light show on the façade of the Basilica of St. Peter’s, plunged into mourning for this man. At least the president of the Pontifical Council for Culture, Gianfranco Cardinal Ravasi, issued a statement quoting from some lyrics of Mr. Bowie: “Ground Control to Major Tom / Commencing countdown, engines on / Check ignition and may God’s love be with you.” What I found most intimidating, and indeed frightening, was the assumption that others would recognize the reference.”

So – he writes a whole piece ripping into a man he literally knows nothing about.

He doesn’t know the man recovered from a serious drug addiction through the help of AA and stayed sober for the rest of his life. He doesn’t know the man led several others around him to sobriety. He doesn’t know this man is the father of a son and daughter and was very happily married – in a Christian ceremony – to his wife, Iman… and that they were together for 24 years until his death. He doesn’t know about the man’s open struggle with faith and belief and how so many of his songs reflected that. One of my favorites:

“Walking in the snowy street
Let me understand
Drifting down a silent park
Stumbling over land
Open up your heart to me
Show me who you are
And I would be your slave
Do you sleep in quietude?
Do you walk in peace?
Do you laugh out loud at me?
No one else is free
Open up your heart to me
Show me all you are
And I would be your slave
I don’t sit around and wait
I don’t give a damn
I don’t see the point at all
No footprints in the sand
I bet you laugh out loud at me
A chance to strike me down
Give me peace of mind at last
Show me all you are
Open up your heart to me
And I would be your slave.”

And another:

“In this age of grand illusion
You walked into my life
Out of my dreams
I don’t need another change
Still you forced your way
Into my scheme of things
You say we’re growing,
Growing heart and soul
In this age of grand illusion
You walked into my life
Out of my dreams
Sweet name, you’re born once again for me
Oh sweet name, I call you again
Just because I believe, don’t mean I don’t think as well
Don’t have to question everything
In heaven or hell
Lord, I kneel and offer you
My word on a wing
And I’m trying hard to fit among
Your scheme of things
It’s safer than a strange land
But I still care for myself
And I don’t stand in my own light
Lord, Lord, MY prayer flies
Like a word on a wing.”

Etc…

So yeah. I’ve never listened to Fr. Rutler since. It takes a particular kind of person to publish something when so ignorant of a topic – and I want nothing to do with that.

What my reader saw in Bowie was a human being who died and who had lived trying to struggle with grace toward Light. What Fr. Rutler appears to have seen, given his callous response the death of a human being, was a chance to land a punch against this pope, rather like what he was doing in signing this absurd letter and lashing out at Jimmy in a torrent of insults. As a layperson looking for some signs of love, mercy, and charity from clergy, my response to the death of a man like David Bowie is Ebenezer Scrooge’s, “Let me see some tenderness connected with a death!” Fr. Rutler had none to spare for a man about whom he himself confesses he knows nothing before he started in sneering in his zeal to spit on Francis. It’s not that he hates Bowie. It’s that, as a priest, he has not the slightest interest that a man is dead and that somebody may grieve him. There is a power struggle to be waged and that is what mattered both two years ago and three days ago.

PS. I was never particularly a Bowie fan myself, but I certainly can respect those who are. More than that, I am one of those who thinks that it was a deeply hopeful sign–and a beautiful act of witness to Bowie’s Christian hope–that he did this at a memorial concert for Freddie Mercury:

I don’t know that I’d call it the “bravest moment in rock n roll history”. But when Christians endlessly complain about “godlessness” in the arts and then one of the gutsiest artist in the history of rock leads a bazillion fans of his and Mercury’s music in the Our Father in total sincerity, I for one take that as a win.

Eternal memory, David Bowie. May God grant you mercy and peace through Christ our Lord. And may he guard and guide good shepherds like Pope Francis to be a witness to shepherds who need to learn imitate, not fight, him in imitating Christ.

Uncategorized

Pope Francis

Previous Post

May 6, 2019

A Reader Objects to my Discussion of Prudential Judgment

Next Post

May 8, 2019 Mission Creep

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 September 2006 June 2006 July 2005 April 2005 May 2002 April 2002 0000

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz