A Reader Has an Interesting Poser About the Morality of Security Work

Last updated on: May 13, 2019 at 12:26 am by Mark Shea

A Reader Has an Interesting Poser About the Morality of Security Work 2019-05-06T17:44:15-07:00 Mark Shea

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

They write:

In the past, you’ve written a lot about lying, specifically exploring edge cases, questions of “the right to know the truth,” and the fact that lying is always materially wrong. I think you’ve approached the subject in a very reasonable and Catholic way.

Thank you.

I know people have raised the issue of undercover police officers, spies, etc. but you haven’t deep-dived on those concerns in the past — understandably, since most of the time people aren’t asking in good faith, they’re just desperate to justify the lies that Their Side wants to say are okay.

Yeah.

However, I genuinely DO find myself in situations where my job involves misleading people and assuming fake identities. I’m a security consultant, and one of the things I sometimes do in my job is what’s called a “red team” assessment where my colleagues and I simulate a break-in. Sometimes these engagements involve running phishing campaigns or social engineering where we try to trick employees into downloading malware or giving us credentials.

Okay.

My question is: is this lying? And if so, is it materially sinful?

It sounds like it’s lying at first blush. And if so, then Thomas would say yes, it’s sinful—likely a venial sin, like most lying. But then again, something in my bones also suspects it’s not the same kind of speech act as, for instance, the lying for Jesus scenarios of which the prolife movement has become so passionately enamored in the past decade. So I’m not sure.

The question turns on whether what you describe is lying or something else. If it is, then yes, it’s sinful. If it’s not, then it may well be morally legit. The difference between that and what the Liars for Jesus in the Christianist Cult of Trump advocate is that they eagerly support lying with abandon if they think they can gain power by it and then try to legitimize it by saying the ends justify the means, a moral position categorically condemned by the Church ever since Paul wrote Romans 3:8. That you are taking such care to discover the distinction between the diabolical sophistry of the Christianist Liars for Jesus and the Church’s teaching speaks very well of you.

I’m not going to reason about culpability & gravity, because those will vary by circumstance. I also see how undercover work could be a near occasion of sin for some people, or form bad habits that they find hard to shake even outside of work… but since that’s a specific concern aimed at particular peoples’ personalities and weaknesses, I don’t know that it works as the foundation for a universal rule.

Okay.

My instinct is that there’s probably some nuance that makes deception in good faith not lying. It seems ridiculous to claim that testing people’s security awareness by simulating attacks is *evil*. But I can’t reason my way to the conclusion I expect without lapsing into consequentialism. And I definitely don’t want to shoehorn my logic to fit pre-determined conclusions just because they’re convenient.

I am not a moral theologian, nor do I play one on the internet. I’m giving you my personal impression and my personal reaction, based on how I would navigate this in light of the Church’s teaching if I were in your shoes. So don’t feel like I’m passing judgment on you. I’m not. And I may be missing something here. My prima facie impression is that deceiving people about who you are is lying. However, if your workers have been informed that they will be subjected to assessments that will include the sorts of things you are doing, it could be argued that what you are doing is closer to role playing or acting, which is a different moral category altogether and is not lying since there is a social contract between the actor and the audience in which the audience understands that they are, if you will, agreeing to let themselves be ‘deceived’ via willing suspension of disbelief.

This is not precisely the same as the contract between the worker and the company who have hired you. But there is a quality of ‘you have been warned’ if we assume the company has told the worker that they will be subjected to assessments and tests like these. So on second thought, I wonder if I am wrong here. Bottom line, I’m not sure.

Go not to the elves for counsel, for they will say both ‘yes’ and ‘no’. – JRR Tolkien.

What have solid theologians and philosophers had to say on this? How might I reason with this edge case?

I have no idea what real moral theologians and philosophers have said about such situations. But you might contact, for instance, Christopher Tollefson, who is a real moral philosopher and who has written extensively—and rightly—about the immorality of lying to see what he has to say about this particular situation. He did brilliant work refuting the Christianist Liars for Jesus back in 2011 and writes with real integrity. If he answers you, I would be interested in hearing what he has to say.

Also to clarify: I’m not asking for spiritual direction or how I should proceed in my unique circumstances. I’m just interested to hear your take on it as a hypothetical, philosophical question.

Excellent. Understood.

Uncategorized

Mailbag

Previous Post

May 11, 2019

Jean Vanier, Ora Pro Nobis

Next Post

May 13, 2019 Day 1 of the CAEI Tin Cup Rattle

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 September 2006 June 2006 July 2005 April 2005 May 2002 April 2002 0000

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz