A Tale of Two Covenants, Part Two

Last updated on: November 8, 2018 at 12:41 am by Mark Shea

A Tale of Two Covenants, Part Two 2018-10-29T23:42:52-07:00 Mark Shea

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

As we discussed in our last column, the Progressive Dissenting reaction to the Reflections on Covenant and Mission document was as wrong as it was hasty. Many people assumed that “the Church now teaches” that salvation was possible apart from Jesus Christ. But in fact the Church has never reversed (and will never reverse) its clear teaching concerning Christ that “there is salvation in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved” (Acts 4:12). However, Progressive Dissenters often wish the Church did not teach what it has always taught, and they often use the media to trumpet imaginary “changes” in the Church’s teaching.

Worse still, Reactionary Dissenters often believe what they hear trumpeted in the media and over-react accordingly, panicking and reflexively making counter-claims which also either contradict Church teaching, or bind the faithful to propositions the Church has not definitively taught.

The trouble for Reactionary Dissenters, when it comes to the relationship of the Old and New Covenants, tends to center around certain passages from Nostra Aetate, the Vatican II document on the Church’s relationship with the Jews. It reads:

[W]hat happened in His passion cannot be charged against all the Jews, without distinction, then alive, nor against the Jews of today. Although the Church is the new people of God, the Jews should not be presented as rejected or accursed by God, as if this followed from the Holy Scriptures. All should see to it, then, that in catechetical work or in the preaching of the word of God they do not teach anything that does not conform to the truth of the Gospel and the spirit of Christ.

and:

As Holy Scripture testifies, Jerusalem did not recognize the time of her visitation, nor did the Jews in large number, accept the Gospel; indeed not a few opposed its spreading. Nevertheless, God holds the Jews most dear for the sake of their Fathers; He does not repent of the gifts He makes or of the calls He issues–such is the witness of the Apostle (Romans 11:28-29).

Contrary to this, one well-known Reactionary Dissenter insists:

The Church is hostile to “Jews” because they have defined themselves as rejecters of Christ. The Church is anti-Jewish…

Don’t misunderstand. This well known Reactionary Dissenter thinks being “anti-Jewish” is a good thing. True Catholic Faith[TM] is, according to this and many other Reactionary Dissenters, defined not by the love of Christ, but by being “anti-Jewish”. This despite the fact that Nostra Aetate clearly teaches:

We cannot truly call on God, the Father of all, if we refuse to treat in a brotherly way any man, created as he is in the image of God. Man’s relation to God the Father and his relation to men his brothers are so linked together that Scripture says: “He who does not love does not know God” (1 John 4:8).

No foundation therefore remains for any theory or practice that leads to discrimination between man and man or people and people, so far as their human dignity and the rights flowing from it are concerned.

The Church reproves, as foreign to the mind of Christ, any discrimination against men or harassment of them because of their race, color, condition of life, or religion. On the contrary, following in the footsteps of the holy Apostles Peter and Paul, this sacred synod ardently implores the Christian faithful to “maintain good fellowship among the nations” (1 Peter 2:12), and, if possible, to live for their part in peace with all men, so that they may truly be sons of the Father who is in heaven.

Some Reactionary Dissenters try to get around this teaching by circulating petitions “publicly requesting the Holy Father to officially and formally declare that Catholics are not bound to hold or accept the novel teachings of Vatican II.”

Others are less direct, and more confusing to many Catholics. Instead of the preposterous claim that Vatican II can simply be ignored, they instead attempt to bind Catholics to a sweeping and highly problematic proposition: the notion that the covenant with Moses has been “revoked”. Many adopt a position that is the photographic negative of the Judaizers in the books of Acts. Instead of insisting that Christian Gentiles have to become Jews to be saved, they insist that Christian Jews have to become Gentiles.

Bottom line: In addition to often being a direct attack on the indefectibility of the Church, this issue also matters because it raises troubling pastoral issues. In parts three and four of this series, we will take a look at whether the Church has, in fact, ever taught that the Old Covenant has been revoked.

Uncategorized

Jewish Issues

Previous Post

November 8, 2018

Why am I running a series on the Church's teaching about the relationship...

Next Post

November 9, 2018 A Tale of Two Covenants, Part Three

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 September 2006 June 2006 July 2005 April 2005 May 2002 April 2002 0000

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz