A reader has a question about Arius

Last updated on: September 24, 2018 at 12:11 am by Mark Shea

A reader has a question about Arius 2018-09-18T11:36:07-07:00 Mark Shea

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

He writes:

Mr. Shea, I have a question for you if you’re willing to oblige. In Thomas More’s “Dialogue Concerning Heresies” 1.24, he speaks of how the faith of the church is needed to properly understand Scripture, and offers the example of what could happen if a child was not first instructed in the faith but just given a Bible to read — how easily the kid could come to the conclusion of Arius if not given pre-instruction in Christ’s divinity.

My question is this – what was the state of such pre-instruction in the case of Arius? I assume that he didn’t just come to read the Scriptures out of thin air, but was given some instruction in the faith beforehand – if so, how/why did he not read the Scriptures in the correct sense thereafter? Was it that the catechesis he would’ve received in Christology would not have been as refined/defined as it later would be following Nicaea? Or was it that he received sufficient instruction but simply ended up tossing it aside in favor of his own interpretation?

This is one thing I’ve been trying to sharpen my thinking on when we talk about the faith of the church being passed down, particularly among the clergy – how someone like Athanasius could have apparently been formed so concretely in the belief in Christ’s divinity whereas a priest like Arius . . . wasn’t? Or didn’t heed it and instead ended up favoring his own opinion? Any response you might offer on this, however brief or ill-formed, would be welcome. Thanks!

This is a question for a historian and scholar of the life of Arius, not me. I don’t know who Arius’ formative influences were, but my guess is that he undoubtedly is a sectarian, not an individualist like a modern Protestant American crank would be. That is, I’m sure he saw his theories about Jesus as being in line with some school of theology and biblical interpretation and himself as a devoted disciple of some master. It was the habit of ancient Christians to see themselves that way, not to see themselves as bold individuals against The System. My advice would be to go here and check out the discussion of his life. http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/01718a.htm which seems to me to comport with that analysis. There is in Arius, of course, the willfulness of the heretic in refusing to listen to the judgment of the rest of the Church. But there is also the reality that precisely the excuse the heretic can offer is that the Church has not defined the matter until the heretic is condemned.

We something like this happening in the present hour as the Greatest Catholics of All Time shriek and howl at the Pope for clarifying the already quite clear teaching of the Church regarding the death penalty. The major development on this score came with JPII, not Francis. He *virtually* abolished it (and in fact began the work of calling for its abolition in law that his successors have carried on). But he left a tiny loophole that death penalty zealots have tried to ram ridiculous arguments through with the claim that they are the *real* traditionalists. Arius likewise used a synodal condemnation of “homoousious” to claim that he was the real champion of orthodoxy. It never would have occurred to him to boast that he was overturning ages of ridiculous tradition in favor of the New and Cool. Everybody in that age sought to justify their ideas with the claim they were old and rooted, not the New Hotness. Arius’ problem was that he was blind to the fact that he really was departing from the Tradition and was doing so by the time-honored method of the heretic, by suppressing something in the tradition that irked him and emphasizing the parts of the Tradition he liked and understood.

Hope that helps!

Uncategorized

Mailbag

Previous Post

September 22, 2018

Boston! I'll be there on September 25!

Next Post

September 25, 2018 Sacramental Letters

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 September 2006 June 2006 July 2005 April 2005 May 2002 April 2002 0000

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz