BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian
Beliefs
- Buddhist
- Catholic
- Contemplative
- Evangelical
- General Christian
- Hindu
- Jewish
- Latter-day Saint
- More Voices
- Muslim
- New Visions
- Pagan
- Progressive Christian
Topics
- Religion News
- Food and Religion
- Sports and Religion
- Religious Art
- Religious Music and Entertainment
- Religious Events
- History and Religion
- Style and Religion
- Politics and Religion
- Women in Religion
- Recreation Outdoors and Religion
- Business Finance and Religion
- Careers Workplace and Religion
- Education and Religion
- Family Parenting and Religion
- Health Fitness and Religion
- Home and Religion
- Relationships and Religion
- Technology and Religion
- Travel and Religion
Columnists
- Buddhist Columnists
- Business Finance and Religion Columnists
- Careers Workplace and Religion Columnists
- Catholic Columnists
- Contemplative Columnists
- Education and Religion Columnists
- Evangelists Columnists
- Family Parenting and Religion Columnists
- General Christian Columnists
- Health Fitness and Religion Columnists
- Hindu Columnists
- History and Religion Columnists
- Home and Religion Columnists
- Jewish Columnists
- More Voices Columnists
- Latter Day Columnists
- Muslim Columnists
- New Visions Columnists
- Nonreligious Columnists
- Pagan Columnists
- Politics and Religion Columnists
- Progressive Columnists
- Recreation Outdoors and Religion Columnists
- Relationships and Religion Columnists
- Religion News Columnists
- Religious Art Columnists
- Religious Events Columnists
- Religious Music and Entertainment Columnists
- Sports and Religion Columnists
- Style and Religion Columnists
- Technology and Religion Columnists
- Travel and Religion Columnists
- Women in Religion Columnists
Resource Library
- 2026 Calendar
- Library of World Religions
- The 100 Most Holy Places on Earth
- Patheos Answers
- Podcasts
- Videos
- Faith Leaders Database
- Anglican Episcopalian
- Bahai
- Baptist
- Buddhism
- Christianity
- Confucianism
- Eastern Orthodoxy
- Hinduism
- Holiness and Pentecostal
- ISKCON
- Islam
- Judaism
- Lutheran
- Methodist
- The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
- New Age
- Paganism
- Presbytarian and Reformed
- Protestantism
- Religion Behind the Scenes
- Roman Catholic
- Scientology
- Shia Islam
- Sikhism
- Sufism
- Sunni Islam
- Taoism
- Zen
- See all religions
Research Tools
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
- Trending:
- Forgiveness
- |
- Marriage
- |
- Consciousness
- |
- Death Penalty
- |
- Election
- |
- Halloween
Catholic and Enjoying It!
- Home
- Catholic
- Today’s Palace Coup News
Today’s Palace Coup News
Last updated on: August 30, 2018 at 2:47 pm by Mark Shea
Today’s Palace Coup News 2018-08-30T14:47:30-07:00 Mark Shea
Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.
Here is all we actually, documentably know.
A man with a huge grudge against Francis and various others in the heirarchy accuses the one guy who actually got rid of McCarrick of being The Villain and the Usual Suspects instantly start screaming “RESIGN!”
Me: I’m having trouble wrapping my mind around the concept that the guy who, by his own confession, knew McCarrick was an abuser and did not call the cops, but did celebrate a dinner honoring him as a Great Evangelist is now accusing the one guy who did get rid of McCarrick as the villain and everybody is treating the guy who protected McCarrick as the hero.
Archbishop Viganò seated next to then-Cardinal McCarrick, front row on left, along with other U.S. cardinals, Glory and Thomas Sullivan and John Garvey, at a fundraiser on May 10, 2013. (CNS photo/Edmund Pfueller, Catholic University of America)
That picture was taken in 2013, seven years after Viganò says he knew, but more than five years before he bothered to tell us.
Does nobody think that’s weird? Especially when he refuses to offer evidence for the claim that Francis knowingly protected McCarrick while he is busy confessing, “I knowingly protected McCarrick.” Why are people screaming for Francis to resign on the basis of this guy’s undocumented claims and nobody is demanding Vigano explain why he never called the cops?
“Well, what could he have done? He claims he only knew of adults harrassed and assaulted by McCarrick, not minors.”
He could have called the cops. Sexual assault and harrassment of adults is a crime too.
“Oh yeah! Well Francis only acted when McCarrick’s crimes became public!”
And those crimes could have been made public in 2006, according to Vigano. But instead, he did nothing to alert the public to this dangerous predator, by his own confession, but did enjoy hanging out with him at public soirees. Why is he a hero again? And why is his undocumented word sufficient basis to shriek that Francis–the only one who acted–MUST RESIGN!
Meanwhile, we learn that this claim–which is central to the Register’s story of Benedict’s alleged Double Secret Probation allegedly placed on McCarrick:
The Register has independently confirmed that the allegations against McCarrick were certainly known to Benedict, and the Pope Emeritus remembers instructing Cardinal Bertone to impose measures but cannot recall their exact nature.
is absolutely contradicted by Benedict’s personal secretary. Reader Henry Karlson provides the following translation from the German press:
Archbishop Georg Gänswein, private secretary of Benedict XVI, has rejected the claim that the emeritus Pope has confirmed the allegations of former Vatican diplomat Carlo Viganò. “Pope Benedict has not commented on the ‘memorandum’ of Archbishop Viganò and will not do so,” Gänswein told the newspaper. The claim that the emeritus Pope had confirmed the statements lacked any foundation. “Fake news!” Says Gänswein
Beyond this, we have the word of various bishops and Catholic talking heads, pro and con, about the reliability of Vigano. Those opinions line up, as a general rule, pretty closely with those who hate, dislike, or are discomfited by Francis and those who are neutral, like, or love the man. So that’s not too useful as a metric.
That said, there is an important distinction and one which Francis’ behavior helps to support.
The reality is not there is a split between those who insist Francis is guilty of protecting an abuser and those who insist he is innocent. Rather, it is between those who insist this dubiously sourced bomb, promoted by people who have hated Francis for five years is PROOF and who immediately shout RESIGN! without investigation and those of us who still think that somebody is innocent till proven guilty and who want what Francis wants: a full investigation by media and blogs and right wing gossip centers that are not visible from space enemies of Francis.
“The New York Times reported Aug. 28 that one of the people Viganò consulted with while writing his statement was U.S. lawyer Timothy Busch, who is on the board of governors of EWTN, which owns the [National Catholic] Register.”
In other words, the guy who wrote the allegations consulted with and was helped by a rich guy on the board of EWTN, which not only employes Edward Pentin–whose claims were just exploded as “fake news” by the man closest to Benedict, but which also has hosted Eternal FOX News auditioner Raymond Arroyo and his doggedly Francis-bashing “Papal Posse”. This was very carefully planned, but not very carefully documented.
Meanwhile, Francis’ response is “Hey press! Go to it! Dig up the facts and you tell me if I’m guilty of what Vigano claims.”
That’s my position too. Show me the evidence that Francis is as guilty as Vigano of protecting an abuser and I will join the chorus calling for his resignation. But at present there’s no There there.
Meanwhile, what most impresses me is this:
The primary achievement of the attempted coup against Francis so far is that victims have been entirely forgotten and the Usual Suspects in the conservative Catholic propaganda machine have focused on what really interests them: destroying their culture war enemies (Francis above all) and grasping at power.
The interest in facts seems to be entirely secondary. Here, for instance, is Thomas Peters treating facts as unimportant if he can just land some ideological punches while my friend Lizzie Scalia, (whose heart has been well and truly broken by all this) over on Twitter is calling for us to stick to facts and find out what happened.

That’s the real division: between those of us who want the truth to come out, come what may (including, if necessary, the resignation of Francis) for the sake of the victims, and those who just want to hurt their culture war enemies by any means necessary–for the sake of power.
Everything about this stinks with the ugly stench of the Greatest Catholics of All Time using classic Right Wing Media Panic Du Jour tactics to stampede the harried (and only dimly informed), to clutch at power, and to claw their way over the dead and wounded bodies of people they could not care less about to achieve their goals.
All we actually know is that the guy (and the Right Wing Media Machine at the Register, Liesite, and other organs of Francis-hatred) offering undocumented allegations (some of which are now *directly* contradicted by Benedict’s secretary) confesses he knew McCarrick was a predator and did not call the cops. Indeed, he feted McCarrick and honored him at dinners. Meanwhile, the conservative Catholic Noise Machine that has hated Francis from the moment he was elected carefully timed the erroneously fact-checked bomb to hurt the guy they have hated and have somehow convinced the Greatest Catholics of All Time that the protector who did nothing is a hero and the Fount of All Truth. And for their crowning audacity, they declare the guy who actually got rid of McCarrick to be guilty and demand his resignation. And multiple, well-financed right wing outlet has long, pre-prepared documents saying “Game Over!” within a ridiculously short time after this well-coordinated attack was launched.
I say what I’ve said all along: Evidence. Fact. Documentation. Let’s have it. All we have at present is a bunch of allegations amplified by conservative Catholic media and accompanied by screams of “RESIGN!” from people whose judgment I would not trust for a million dollars.
Evidence. Fact. Documentation. Let’s have it.
And above all, let’s get the focus back where it belongs: on healing the victims and punishing the perps.
Previous Post

August 28, 2018
My series on Catholic Social Teaching
Next Post

August 29, 2018 Today's New Facts I Learned About the Palace Coup
Browse Our Archives
Select a Category Uncategorized
Select a Month May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 September 2006 June 2006 July 2005 April 2005 May 2002 April 2002 0000
Follow Us!
TAKE THE
Religious Wisdom Quiz
In this Gospel, Jesus' first miracle is not recorded, and the narrative begins with a voice crying in the wilderness. Which Gospel starts with John the Baptist's ministry?
Select your answer to see how you score.
Mark Luke John Matthew
Related posts from Catholic and Enjoying It!
A reader writes to ponder the work of...
I don't buy all of this, but....
Cdl. Burke Dissents from the Church's Teaching
TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic
Did You Know Holy Pagans Helped Shape Our...
Christians tend to have a negative view of the Canaanites; there is...
War As Hell: A Christian Argument For Peace
I don't understand it, and yet, I do. When Pope Leo XIV...
Is Catholicism The Fulfillment Of The Old Testament?
Catholicism makes sense only when wedded to the Old Testament. Put differently,...
How Grandma Tourism Helps Grandparents Live Their Vocation
Grandma, The New Travel Influencer What started as a nostalgia-inspired social media...
Hope for the World: Thoughts on ‘Credo: A...
This essay begins a series of meditations on “Credo: A Story of...
Why Is Catholicism Centered on an Instrument of...
Catholicism is strange. At its very center, Catholicism holds up a man...
view all Catholic blogs
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
- About Us
- 2026 Calendar
- Videos
- Podcasts
- Library of World Religions
- Faith In Media Tracker
- Advertise With Us
- Write for Us
- Privacy Policy
- Terms of Service
- Do Not Sell My Data
- Contact Us
- Radiant Digital
- Manage Newsletter Subscriptions
- Unsubscribe From Notifications
- Sitemap
Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.
Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In






