Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Catholic and Enjoying It!

Pete Vere Asks the Musical Question….

Last updated on: May 4, 2018 at 9:14 am   by Mark Shea

Pete Vere Asks the Musical Question…. 2018-05-04T09:14:41-07:00 Mark Shea

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

“Is it time for a New Catholic Apologetics Movement?”

He’s got a bunch of good ideas, all of which I more or less agree with.

I’m mostly riffing off his piece here, not really to add or subtract or dispute, but just because he got me thinking about my own experience with that work.

Other people call me an apologist, I don’t.  It’s a fair cop.  I have, after all, written a lot of apologetics about Catholicky stuff. But that was mostly because it was of interest to me at the time since I was myself learning that stuff and wanting to talk about it out loud since that’s what I always do when I am excited about learning new stuff.

My big motivation is and always has been the thrill of learning new things and then the thrill of watching the lights come on when other see it too.  I’m an extrovert trapped in an introvert’s job.  So my way of connecting with people is to either write about it and work through the explanation of Whatever I’m Learning or else to speak to an audience about it and watch the thrill as they Get It.

But the Learning Edge is important to me.  So I am unmoved by people who come and say, “Why don’t you write By What Authority? again?  We liked you when you told Protestants they were wrong about Sacred Tradition and made us feel good.  Why are you on about all this Catholic Social Teaching stuff that sounds like liberal crackpot Bergoglio? We don’t like it when you suggest that we might be wrong and the Pope right. Tell us more about us and how awesome we are!

The answer is that I am still learning the Faith and the Church’s social teaching is an amazing new vein of rich information and wisdom and I am still trying to wrap my head around it.

And I am disturbed by how hostile those who have boasted of the Non-Cafeteria Catholic Super Fidelity are to it and the Holy Father. To quote, yet again, Russell Moore: The Religious Right are the people the Religious Right warned you about twenty years ago.

That brings me to Pete’s article, because I agree a New Apologetics is necessary since the Church’s engagement with the culture has changed.  We are not living in Evangelical-dominated America any more.  A lot of Evangelical culture has, in fact, entered the Church since a lot of Evangelicals (including me) have entered the Church.  And with us, a lot of social and political assumptions have entered too.

The trouble is, they are assumptions that are at odds–sometime radical odds–with the Church and the teaching of the Magisterium.  And so we now live in a time when things I never dreamed would happen 20 years ago are the norm.  Things like “faithful conservative Catholics” cheering for a pornocratic racist Nazi swine who embodies the seven deadly sins and war with the corporal and spiritual works of mercy–and making open war on the Holy Father as some kind of enemy of the Faith.

Twenty years ago, the mission was to persuade conservative Evangelicals that the Catholic faith was biblical faith.  Today, it is to speak to postmodern non-Christians, many of whom are attracted to the Faith by the witness of Pope Francis and the Church’s mission  to the least of these. But they are also rightly repelled by the scandalous and appalling cruelty of the false gospel of Christianism and need a clear witness that this is not the gospel of Jesus Christ but a diabolical parody. 

Accordingly, the apologetics I did twenty years ago still hold and I still stand by what I wrote then.  I still say what I said then about Sacred Tradition, the Real Presence, Mary, the saints, the sacraments, the creed, and all the rest of it.  Nothing has changed about my faith in the Church’s dogmatic teaching.  I believe all that the Holy Catholic Church believes, teaches, and proclaims is revealed  by God.

But the change in the culture requires new wineskins for new wine.  Postmoderns are not puzzling their heads about the Real Presence or justification by faith or the other struggles about 16th century quarrels or the Second Vatican Council.  They are asking “If the Faith is true, then why are the loudest Catholics in the culture gloating with sadistic cruelty at the deportation of DACA kids?  If Jesus is real, why are Catholics talking incessantly about their terrified need to blow somebody’s head off to keep their stuff safe?  Why does a universal Church have so many members ready to scream at desperate little kids at the border and call them “invaders” or make excuses for Nazis running as Republicans?”

It is the scandalous behavior of Catholics that is the biggest apologetic challenge in our culture.  Twenty years ago, you could say, “Sure there are bad Catholics, but look to the ones who are faithful to the teaching of the pope and the Magisterium.”

Now it is the “Good Catholics” of yesterday who are today, the loudest, most ugly enemies of the Holy Father and the Magisterium while the ones they denounce as “fake Catholics” are listening to the Pope and the Magisterium–and leading the charge to care for the alien, the orphan, and the widow.  It was not liberals who spent 15 years defending a war opposed by two popes and all the bishops of the world.  It was not liberals who spent the past decade coming up with elaborate theological rationales for torture.  It was not liberals who spent the past decade rationalizing spitting on refugees, calling Francis a heretic, explaining why “grab ’em by the pussy” is fine, and all the rest of the freak show stuff that is now normal for self-described “Real Catholics”.

That’s what I have to deal with when I write apologetics for the sake of some inquirer who is drawn to the Faith, but appalled by so many of the Faithful.  Most of the people I run into who are attracted to the Faith are not struggling with Calvin’s doctrine of predestination or torn apart by banners in the sanctuary or grappling with whether Mary is a pagan goddess.  They are crossing much more elemental threshholds of trust and asking “Will I find love there?  I’m trying to feed my baby after my husband left.  Do they think I’m a lazy slut looking for a handout?  I think I’m gay, but I also think Jesus is God.  Are they more interested in sending me away or in getting to know me?”

In short, most of the apologetics stuff seems to be about personal matters and not about doctrinal issues.  And when I look at the pope, what he seems to consistently do is try to figure out how to welcome people at their growing edge, not find ways to drive them out.

There is no office of apologist in the Church. There is an office of Evangelist (“It was he who gave some to be apostles, some prophets, some evangelists, pastors, and teachers” says Paul to the Ephesians.)  Apologetics is merely the handmaid to evangelism.  I am leery of giving it primacy or imagining it is more than it is: a mechanism for clearing away intellectual doubts so that the disciple can approach the evangel.  I’ve seen it become a weapon too many times and most of the nastiness that has been dished out to Francis from the apologetics subculture seems to me to be coming from people who decided they had a System and it was more important than the human being Francis seeks for Christ.

Not really sure how to wind this up other than to say that a New Apologetics will need to take into account Francis’ approach to evangelism, which is summarized easily as “He has preached good news to the poor.”  Pete gets that, I think, which is why he is such a fan of this pope and has done a fine job of defending the Faith as it is preached by Good Pope Francis.

Uncategorized

Apologetic stuff

Previous Post



May 3, 2018

Mailbag: On Judging

Next Post



May 5, 2018 My Chum Mike Drollman...


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 September 2006 June 2006 July 2005 April 2005 May 2002 April 2002 0000


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What analogy does Jesus use for believers in Matthew 5:13-14?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Gold and silver Salt and light A tree and its fruit Bread and water

Related posts from Catholic and Enjoying It!

Catholic

The Catholic Apologetics Subculture has developed spiritual lupus

Catholic and Enjoying It!

Catholic

Bp. Robert Barron, as usual, makes a lot...

Catholic and Enjoying It!

Catholic

A short conversation about lay Catholic apologists

Catholic and Enjoying It!

Catholic

Question about the Magisterium and Catholic Unity

Catholic and Enjoying It!

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human Action

Christianity is a religion of hope. We are to have hope and...

It’s What Comes From Within Which Matters

One of the most difficult things for us to understand is why...

Why I Choose the Eucharist Over the Sermon

Choose the Eucharist, Not the Sermon What are we supposed to get...

5 Design Elements Found in Spiritually Rooted Homes

Putting Spirituality Into Home Decor Our homes are more than our living...

Credo: A Story of God Told with the...

About 10 years ago, I began to imagine a personal "Credo" that...

The Anatomy of Divine Revelation in Catholic Thought

The claim that God has made Himself known to human beings is...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube