Question about the Genesis Flood

Last updated on: December 4, 2014 at 12:43 am by Mark Shea

Question about the Genesis Flood 2014-11-17T18:48:25-07:00 Mark Shea

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A reader writes:

A protestant friend of mine has been reading Genesis with his protestant glasses, and we have started to discuss some of his thoughts. Neither of us know anything about science except what we have forgotten from grade school.

I know the Church does not have an official teaching on what, if any, ‘science’ there is in Genesis, so we are free to believe any scientific theory we think plausible. I believe Genesis was never meant to be an attempt at science and should not be treated that way. It is basically a story to tell us some profound truths about God and ourselves – He made the world, He made it good, He made us, we were made in His image & likeness, we sinned and lost paradise.

My friend tells me this:

Yes, I believe the flood was worldwide and it was a cataclysmic event. The theory that I think is the most credible, is before the Great Flood, there wasn’t any rain and that the earth was watered through underground reservoirs of water and mists from above and below. The flood was caused by this water canopy collapsing from above and these water reservoirs exploding from below. This event would have created most of the mountains and the oceans and such places as The Grand Canyon. It does boggle my mind that it could have rained forty days and nights, but I still believe it. Biblically, Noah and his family were on the ark for about a year. That’s how long it took the water to recede. I believe that all of the continents were connected until a short time after the flood.

I personally think this is beyond ridiculous… we simply would have evidence of something like that happening. I asked him what scientific source he read this theory in, and he pointed me to John Rice’s Biblical Commentary on Genesis.

So of course I thought, “What does Mark Shea have to say about Science and Genesis?” I found surprisingly little when I did a search on your website. Can you point me to an article or two where you might address this topic? I don’t believe the great flood was world-wide, and I don’t think the human race started with Adam and Eve’s children all committing incest with each other… but I’m open to any argument you might have to the contrary.

I beg you for your thoughts!

I’m not much use here. My own take on the Flood story is that the primary interest of the author of Genesis is to draw spiritual lessons from a story that was already taken for granted in his culture (and indeed in countless cultures around the world). My tendency is to assume that when a historical, indeed, practically a racial memory of something like a primordial flood disaster has impressed itself on the memory of cultures all around the world, the likelihood is that Something, rather than nothing, lies at the root of that memory. Given that we have copious documentation on sundry massive floods in the areas of Mesopotamia and, in particular, the Black Sea I think it is quite on the cards that a small human population would retain memories of what, for them, would have been world ending disaster and spread out from there carrying that story (with all the normal embroidery and exaggeration that goes with such ancient tales) to the ends of the earth.

Among the peoples who carry that story forward out of the mists of prehistory are the Jews. And in accordance with their mission as the Chosen People, their mythology is the Chosen Mythology. So the bring to bear on the story a perspective that brings both the moral and covenantal imperatives of the revelation they bear to the world. The Flood thus becomes in their telling, a story of judgment for wickedness (in sharp contrast to their neighbor’s telling in the Enuma Elish, which sees it as capricious gods rubbing out the noisy human neighbors downstairs. (I discuss some of this in Making Senses Out of Scripture.) It also is retold as a Re-Creation event in which a new world emerges from the waters of the deep, while the Man again finds himself in a Garden where he again consumes a fruit that again redounds to a curse against future generations. In that, both the creation and fall mirror Israel’s own experience in the Exodus, which is again a salvation through water followed by the sin of the Golden Calf.

I don’t think there’s a lot of point in trying to nail down the exact historical details of the Flood. As you note, the Church certainly does not demand it. I think it’s folly to complete deny a historical basis for it. But I think the main thing to pay attention to is how the author makes use of the pre-existing and already ancient story in order to get across the points he wants to make, which are deeply moral, theological and spiritual and far more profound than the same story as told by his Sumerian neighbors.

As to reconciling the Genesis account of human origins and the evidence of the sciences, I highly recommend Mike Flynn’s delightful essay “Adam and Eve and Ted and Alice” .

Uncategorized

Mailbag

Previous Post

December 4, 2014

Colbert Provides Vitally Needed Analysis of One of the Great Issues of Our Time

Next Post

December 4, 2014 Just because it isn't happening here doesn't mean it isn't happening

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 September 2006 June 2006 July 2005 April 2005 May 2002 April 2002 0000

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz