Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Catholic and Enjoying It!

Steve Ray has a fun piece…

Last updated on: December 29, 2014 at 9:16 pm   by Mark Shea

Steve Ray has a fun piece… 2014-12-29T21:16:25-07:00 Mark Shea

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

… on Crap, Castration, and Two Creations, concerning inter alia the biblical authors’ lack of hesitance in using… organic… imagery to get a point across.

I wrote on something similar once in treating of Swearing and Vulgarity (they are not the same thing).

What’s interesting about vulgarity is that a word that (in English, at any rate) emerges from the lower class is considered dirty.  In post-Norman Conquest England, the Anglish speakers were the lower orders while the French conquerors used a more Latinate tongue.  Consequently you wind up with lots of synonyms that mean exactly the same thing, but the words of the conquered are “crude” or “dirty” while the words of the conquerers are considered refined.  A Norman noblewoman mentruated, expectorated, and perspired while her serving maid bled, spat, and sweated.  The conquerers copulated, defecated, flatulated, and urinated while the conquered (pardon my English) fucked, shitted, farted, and pissed.  The meanings of the words are identical, but the words originating in the languages of the conquered were designated as “filthy”.  It’s interesting how the English class system still exerts this dead hand of oppression on our use of the language, long after the distinction between Norman and Anglo-Saxon disappeared and long after the English class system ceased to have anything like the impact on Americans that it did on Britons.

I suspect that every language has certain “taboo” words.  Blasphemy (whether against God or human social norms) tells us what a society values above all.  In an age that revered God, there were certain things you Could Not Say because they insulted the Holy One.  Today, blasphemers continue to pay backward homage to God by always blaspheming the God of Abraham and never blaspheming Quetzlcoatl or Thor.

That said, we still have blasphemy and it still tells us what is sacrosanct to us.  Revulsion at rape jokes, or use of the word “nigger” (by somebody outside the black community), revulsion at words like “kike” or “wetback” or various other racial slurs and so forth make perfectly clear what is valued by what is taboo to speak.

The problem our culture faces is not too many taboos, but too few.  Taboos are often commentaries on fundamental irreducible canons of human decency.  They are a way of saying, “We don’t *have* to ‘explain’ why its wrong to treat this good thing with contempt.  The iconoclast has to explain why it’s right.”  Our culture of blasphemy and opposition to taboo has been steadily eating away at human dignity because it has “overcome” the taboo that respected God’s dignity and is now destroying human dignity.  Miley Cyrus “overcame a taboo” recently.  She also barfed all over her own dignity as a human being.  Every fresh assault on human dignity begins with the assumption that a taboo is “irrational” when it is usually highly rational or even pre-rational.  A civilization that reaches the point where it is asking, “Why not kill children and the weak?” is not a civilization that is arriving at clarity.  It is a civilization that has gone blind.  To see through everything is the same as not seeing.  We’re not there yet.  Some things are still blasphemous and therefore somethings are still taboo.  Raping women is not funny.  Degrading people because of their skin color is evil.  Using them for body part harvest, or murdering them, or treating them as raw materials is wrong and so, while we do them, we do not speak of it.  All the “envelope pushing” and “barrier breaking” of our culture is ultimately ordered, not toward liberation, but toward enslavement.  Taboos are usually there because they preserve an awareness of something deeply sacred that we destroy at our peril.

Uncategorized

Doings on Other Blogs

Previous Post



September 26, 2013

How to Keep Dinosaurs

Next Post



September 26, 2013 Orestes Brownson Still Speaks to Us Today


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 September 2006 June 2006 July 2005 April 2005 May 2002 April 2002 0000


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Animals that chew the cud but do not have split hooves are considered clean to eat.

Select your answer to see how you score.

FALSE TRUE

Related posts from Catholic and Enjoying It!

Catholic

A Revolutionary Idea for Catholics: Try Listening to...

Catholic and Enjoying It!

Catholic

Simcha Fisher reports on a bizarre and abusive...

Catholic and Enjoying It!

Catholic

And here is some of the last part...

Catholic and Enjoying It!

Catholic

Here's the Next Part of Where Peter Is'...

Catholic and Enjoying It!

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

The Parable Of The Sower And The Word...

One of Christ’s most famous parables is that of the sower who...

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human Action

Christianity is a religion of hope. We are to have hope and...

Why I Choose the Eucharist Over the Sermon

Choose the Eucharist, Not the Sermon What are we supposed to get...

5 Design Elements Found in Spiritually Rooted Homes

Putting Spirituality Into Home Decor Our homes are more than our living...

Credo: A Story of God Told with the...

About 10 years ago, I began to imagine a personal "Credo" that...

The Anatomy of Divine Revelation in Catholic Thought

The claim that God has made Himself known to human beings is...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube