BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian
Beliefs
- Buddhist
- Catholic
- Contemplative
- Evangelical
- General Christian
- Hindu
- Jewish
- Latter-day Saint
- More Voices
- Muslim
- New Visions
- Pagan
- Progressive Christian
Topics
- Religion News
- Food and Religion
- Sports and Religion
- Religious Art
- Religious Music and Entertainment
- Religious Events
- History and Religion
- Style and Religion
- Politics and Religion
- Women in Religion
- Recreation Outdoors and Religion
- Business Finance and Religion
- Careers Workplace and Religion
- Education and Religion
- Family Parenting and Religion
- Health Fitness and Religion
- Home and Religion
- Relationships and Religion
- Technology and Religion
- Travel and Religion
Columnists
- Buddhist Columnists
- Business Finance and Religion Columnists
- Careers Workplace and Religion Columnists
- Catholic Columnists
- Contemplative Columnists
- Education and Religion Columnists
- Evangelists Columnists
- Family Parenting and Religion Columnists
- General Christian Columnists
- Health Fitness and Religion Columnists
- Hindu Columnists
- History and Religion Columnists
- Home and Religion Columnists
- Jewish Columnists
- More Voices Columnists
- Latter Day Columnists
- Muslim Columnists
- New Visions Columnists
- Nonreligious Columnists
- Pagan Columnists
- Politics and Religion Columnists
- Progressive Columnists
- Recreation Outdoors and Religion Columnists
- Relationships and Religion Columnists
- Religion News Columnists
- Religious Art Columnists
- Religious Events Columnists
- Religious Music and Entertainment Columnists
- Sports and Religion Columnists
- Style and Religion Columnists
- Technology and Religion Columnists
- Travel and Religion Columnists
- Women in Religion Columnists
Resource Library
- 2026 Calendar
- Library of World Religions
- The 100 Most Holy Places on Earth
- Patheos Answers
- Podcasts
- Videos
- Faith Leaders Database
- Anglican Episcopalian
- Bahai
- Baptist
- Buddhism
- Christianity
- Confucianism
- Eastern Orthodoxy
- Hinduism
- Holiness and Pentecostal
- ISKCON
- Islam
- Judaism
- Lutheran
- Methodist
- The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
- New Age
- Paganism
- Presbytarian and Reformed
- Protestantism
- Religion Behind the Scenes
- Roman Catholic
- Scientology
- Shia Islam
- Sikhism
- Sufism
- Sunni Islam
- Taoism
- Zen
- See all religions
Research Tools
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
- Trending:
- Forgiveness
- |
- Marriage
- |
- Consciousness
- |
- Death Penalty
- |
- Election
- |
- Halloween
Mark Meckler
- Home
- Politics and Religion
- Here’s the Real Reason Why a 16 Year Old Article about Garbage Just Went Viral
Here’s the Real Reason Why a 16 Year Old Article about Garbage Just Went Viral
Last updated on: January 13, 2018 at 2:06 pm by Mark Meckler
Here’s the Real Reason Why a 16 Year Old Article about Garbage Just Went Viral 2018-01-13T14:06:05-06:00 Mark Meckler
Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

A sixteen year old article by two writers from an alt-weekly newspaper in Portland, Oregon went viral over the weekend, for reasons nobody really knows. Apparently, in 2002, Portland officials decided it was perfectly acceptable for the government to go through residents’ trashcans. Police Chief Mark Kroeker said, “Most judges have the opinion that [once] trash is put out… it’s trash, and abandoned in terms of privacy.”
But Willamette Week’s journalists Chris Lydgate and Nick Budnick weren’t satisfied with that explanation. They asked, “Aren’t citizens protected from unreasonable search and seizure by the Fourth Amendment?” To put it to the test, they got some rubber gloves and went through the garbage cans of three public officials: District Attorney Mike Schrunk whose office vocally defended the idea that garbage is up for grabs, Police Chief Mark Kroeker, and Mayor Vera Katz.
Kroeker, when he learned what the journalists had done, was fine with it. But his tone changed when they spread out the contents of their garbage dump in front of him: a receipt with his credit-card number, a cigar stub, a newsletter from Focus on the Family, a list of his wife’s investments, an email about a job application, and a super-cringe-worthy handwritten note scribbled on a napkin. There was also a flier from a church with a handwritten note which read: “Mark. Just want you to know one Latin from Manhattan Loves You.”
When asked about these items, the Chief finally said, “You know, it’s none of your business.” Then he stood up and said, “we’re done.”
The Mayor was even less enthused when she discovered the journalists went through her recycling. (Her garbage was right next to her house, and they didn’t want to trespass.) “I consider Willamette Week’s actions in this matter to be potentially illegal and absolutely unscrupulous and reprehensible,” her statement read. “I will consider all my legal options in response to their actions.”
Schrunk, however, laughed when he was told their garbage excursion involved discovering that he threw away clothing from his military service. “Do I have to pay for this week’s garbage collection?” he joked. Then added, “Don’t burn me on that. The Marine Corps will shoot me!”
During their investigation, the writers discovered a five-pound bag of dog excrement, an empty bottle of Johnnie Walker Black Label, Chinese takeout boxes, parts of a Thanksgiving turkey, junk food wrappers, notes that indicated the writer was terrible at division, Q tips, used Kleenex, dirty diapers, dryer lint, a TV guide with certain programs circled, remnants of peanut M&Ms, and handwritten notes that made them blush.
So why did this sixteen year old article go viral over the weekend? I think I know. The writers didn’t want to be dumpster divers, they simply wanted to make a point about governmental erosion of privacy. That’s a topic that most Americans are thinking about these days. Writer Elise Herron summed up the appeal of the piece, saying that “it touches on something that the nation is desperately grasping for at the moment: ingenuity when it comes to holding people in power accountable.”
Exactly, but there’s an even more ingenious way to do just that – at the highest levels of government. The Founders of this nation knew that the citizens needed a way to keep powerful elected officials in check, so they gave us Article V of the Constitution. In their prescient wisdom, our Founders knew that politicians would hate to live by the rules they force on regular folks, so they gave states the right to call a convention to make sure the federal government had to answer to its citizens.
Thankfully, using the power the founders gave us in Article V doesn’t require rubber gloves, just a lot of work. The Convention of States Project gives us the ability to limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and it’s gaining more and more momentum every day. Already, twelve states have already passed it, and we’re on our way to getting the rest.
That’s the real reason why the dumpster diving article went viral: Americans are sick and tired of politicians who hand down rules from “on high,” without regard to the freedoms we’re supposed to have.
And holding public officials accountable is just a really appealing idea.
Image Credit: By Bidgee (Own work) [CC BY-SA 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons
Previous Post

January 8, 2018
If You Hate the Trump Admin's Marijuana Decision, You Can Change It
Browse Our Archives
Select a Category Uncategorized
Select a Month July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016
Follow Us!
TAKE THE
Religious Wisdom Quiz
Which prophet predicted the Babylonian captivity would last 70 years?
Select your answer to see how you score.
Haggai Isaiah Ezekiel Jeremiah
Related posts from Mark Meckler
New Harvard Study Says Trigger Warnings Should Come...
Democratic National Committee Chairman Tom Perez Photographed Carrying...
Top Tennessee Dem Party Official Calls Trump Voters...
Netflix Hoping to Offer 700 Faith and Family-based...
TRENDING AT PATHEOS Politics and Religion
Christians should care about politics. Here are 4...
How can Christians best engage with politics in a way that shows...
For Abortion "Rights" Advocates - a Compromise
For pro-life conservatives, it’s like a dream come true. For pro-choice feminazis...
Cornerstone Pastor Issues Apology - GOOD
The apology was warranted. The follow-up is essential. A week ago, the...
From a Conservative to Conservatives on President Trump...
I am a conservative, a Republican, and an evangelical Christian, and I...
view all Politics and Religion blogs
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
- About Us
- 2026 Calendar
- Videos
- Podcasts
- Library of World Religions
- Faith In Media Tracker
- Advertise With Us
- Write for Us
- Privacy Policy
- Terms of Service
- Do Not Sell My Data
- Contact Us
- Radiant Digital
- Manage Newsletter Subscriptions
- Unsubscribe From Notifications
- Sitemap
Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.
Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In









