Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Mark Meckler

WaPo Op-Ed: ‘I Used to Think Gun Control Was the Answer Until My Research Told Me Otherwise’

Last updated on: October 5, 2017 at 9:34 am   by Mark Meckler

WaPo Op-Ed: ‘I Used to Think Gun Control Was the Answer Until My Research Told Me Otherwise’ 2017-10-05T09:34:00-06:00 Mark Meckler

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Screen Shot 2017-10-05 at 9.05.08 AM

After mass casualty gun-related tragedies, you immediately start seeing the same, predictable pattern. Leftists wring their hands, saying “something needs to be done,” then conservatives point out that some things can’t be prevented and — guess what? — the 2nd Amendment is not a suggestion.  It goes on and on.  That’s why I wanted to point out this article in the Washington Post, because it’s a rational piece from a leftist about gun violence.

Yes, I know.  Hard to believe, but it really is. Leah Libresco writes:

Before I started researching gun deaths, gun-control policy used to frustrate me. I wished the National Rifle Association would stop blocking common-sense gun-control reforms such as banning assault weapons, restricting silencers, shrinking magazine sizes and all the other measures that could make guns less deadly.

Then, my colleagues and I at FiveThirtyEight spent three months analyzing all 33,000lives ended by guns each year in the United States, and I wound up frustrated in a whole new way. We looked at what interventions might have saved those people, and the case for the policies I’d lobbied for crumbled when I examined the evidence. The best ideas left standing were narrowly tailored interventions to protect subtypes of potential victims, not broad attempts to limit the lethality of guns.

So what did she do?  She didn’t go to a rally and protest, or post memes on Facebook.  She researched.  Not only did she look into other countries’ legislation, she looked at the proposed “solutions” offered up by emotional liberals in the aftermath of the tragedies.  Guess what?  She realized that “it seemed less and less clear that one broad gun-control restriction could make a big difference.”

When I looked at the other oft-praised policies, I found out that no gun owner walks into the store to buy an “assault weapon.” It’s an invented classification that includes any semi-automatic that has two or more features, such as a bayonet mount, a rocket-propelled grenade-launcher mount, a folding stock or a pistol grip. But guns are modular, and any hobbyist can easily add these features at home, just as if they were snapping together Legos.

As for silencers — they deserve that name only in movies, where they reduce gunfire to a soft puick puick. In real life, silencers limit hearing damage for shooters but don’t make gunfire dangerously quiet. An AR-15 with a silencer is about as loud as a jackhammer. Magazine limits were a little more promising, but a practiced shooter could still change magazines so fast as to make the limit meaningless.

The sad hard-to-accept fact is that sometimes really bad things happen and there’s simply no better way to prevent it.  Regrettably, you can’t eliminate evil through legislation.

Read all of the WaPo article here, and kudos to Libresco for looking at an emotionally tough issue with open, reasonable eyes.

Image Credit: Screen Cap

Hat Tip: Washington Post

Uncategorized

Previous Post



October 5, 2017

Black Lives Matter Students Shut Down ACLU's Campus Free Speech Event; Say They Will Not Support the Constitution

Next Post



October 5, 2017 Pro-Life Congressman Who Urged Mistress to Have An Abortion; Announces His Future Retirement


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did Samuel's mother promise if God gave her a son?

Select your answer to see how you score.

To move to Jerusalem To fast for 40 days To dedicate him to the Lord To offer a burnt sacrifice

Related posts from Mark Meckler

Politics Red

New Harvard Study Says Trigger Warnings Should Come...

Mark Meckler

Politics Red

Democratic National Committee Chairman Tom Perez Photographed Carrying...

Mark Meckler

Politics Red

Top Tennessee Dem Party Official Calls Trump Voters...

Mark Meckler

Politics Red

Netflix Hoping to Offer 700 Faith and Family-based...

Mark Meckler

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Politics and Religion

Christians should care about politics. Here are 4...

How can Christians best engage with politics in a way that shows...

For Abortion "Rights" Advocates - a Compromise

For pro-life conservatives, it’s like a dream come true. For pro-choice feminazis...

Cornerstone Pastor Issues Apology - GOOD

The apology was warranted. The follow-up is essential. A week ago, the...

From a Conservative to Conservatives on President Trump...

I am a conservative, a Republican, and an evangelical Christian, and I...

view all Politics and Religion blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube