Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Mark Meckler

Professor docking points when students don’t use gender-neutral language

Last updated on: April 4, 2017 at 9:54 pm   by Mark Meckler

Professor docking points when students don’t use gender-neutral language 2017-04-04T21:54:17-06:00 Mark Meckler

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Embed from Getty Images

The new fascist have risen and are controlling America’s college campuses, and now, it’s affecting students’ grades.

Cailin Jeffers is an English major at Northern Arizona University. She made the egregious error of writing the term “mankind” in a recent essay and was deducted a point because the professor preferred “humanity” over her gender-specific term.

Dr. Anne Scott sent an e-mail to Jeffers to explain why she penalized her for “problems with diction (word choice):”

I would be negligent, as a professor who is running a class about the human condition and the assumptions we make about being “human,” if I did not also raise this issue of gendered language and ask my students to respect the need for gender-neutral language. The words we use matter very much, or else teachers would not be making an issue of this at all, and the MLA [Modern Language Association] would not be making recommendations for gender-neutral language at the national level.

Scott offered Jeffers a redo if she wanted to correct her word choice, but made it clear that in the future, gender-neutral language is a must in the class:

I will respect your choice to leave your diction choices “as is” and to make whatever political and linguistic statement you want to make by doing so. By the same token, I will still need to subtract a point because your choice will not be made in the letter or spirit of this particular class, which is all about having you and other students looking beneath your assumptions and understanding that “mankind” does not mean “all people” to all people. It positively does not.

Jeffers told Campus Reform that she was purposefully insubordinate; that this was a test to see if Dr. Scott was truly serious about her strict rules. Jeffers explained that after an initial round of essays, the professor urged gender-neutral language such as “humanity” in place of “mankind.” So, in the next assignment, Jeffers inserted the word and found out the professor wasn’t fooling around.

“I stated that I agree with everything she said about my paper except my use of ‘mankind,’” Jeffers said. “She proceeded to tell me that the NAU English department, as well as the Modern Language Association, are pushing for gender-neutral language, and all students must abide by this. She told me that ‘mankind’ does not refer to all people, only males. I refuted, stating that it DOES refer to all people, [but] she proceeded to tell me that I was wrong, ‘mankind’ is sexist, and I should make an effort to look beyond my preset positions and ideologies, as is the focus of the class.”

Scott stressed that her decision “goes beyond ‘political correctness,’” but insisted that the use of terms like “mankind” or referring to readers as “him/he” will result in loss of points.

Let’s hope Jeffers remains intent on resisting this fascism while still maintaining a passing grade, but here’s a serious question.  Why is MANkind wrong and huMANity okay?  These poor fascists don’t have logic as their strong point, do they?

Uncategorized

Previous Post



April 4, 2017

Student activists want college president gone because she won’t cave to demands

Next Post



April 5, 2017 9 Not-So-Exciting Things to Know About Convention of States


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: James says that if anyone is a hearer of the word and not a doer, he is blessed in what he does.

Select your answer to see how you score.

FALSE TRUE

Related posts from Mark Meckler

Politics Red

New Harvard Study Says Trigger Warnings Should Come...

Mark Meckler

Politics Red

Democratic National Committee Chairman Tom Perez Photographed Carrying...

Mark Meckler

Politics Red

Top Tennessee Dem Party Official Calls Trump Voters...

Mark Meckler

Politics Red

Netflix Hoping to Offer 700 Faith and Family-based...

Mark Meckler

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Politics and Religion

Christians should care about politics. Here are 4...

How can Christians best engage with politics in a way that shows...

For Abortion "Rights" Advocates - a Compromise

For pro-life conservatives, it’s like a dream come true. For pro-choice feminazis...

Cornerstone Pastor Issues Apology - GOOD

The apology was warranted. The follow-up is essential. A week ago, the...

From a Conservative to Conservatives on President Trump...

I am a conservative, a Republican, and an evangelical Christian, and I...

view all Politics and Religion blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube