Title IX abuses allow bureaucrats to surveil the sex lives of students

Last updated on: December 20, 2016 at 8:54 am by Mark Meckler

Title IX abuses allow bureaucrats to surveil the sex lives of students 2016-12-20T08:54:56-06:00 Mark Meckler

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Embed from Getty Images

In yet another example of how overreaching federal regulations invariably causes a host of unintended consequences, colleges are now, essentially, micromanaging the sex lives of students thanks to the blank check lawmakers gave them under the Title IX Education Amendments of 1972.

That wasn’t Congress’s original intent, however. It created a law meant to ensure there was no discrimination against the sexes for college athletics. But as is always the case, bureaucrats have turned the regulations into a virtual free-for-all to cover all sorts of conduct, even the private sexual encounters among students.

Here’s what the law states, plainly:

No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.

But finding a loophole has made it so that college administrators are now “micromanage[ing] the sex lives of students,” as Glenn Reynolds writes about in his USA Today op-ed. It also “subject[s] them to Orwellian levels of surveillance, investigation and supervision.”

“In essence, students now risk being kicked out of school for not getting express consent for every sexual act, all based on a law that was intended, 45 years ago, to end discrimination in college athletics,” Reynolds added.

Two Harvard Law School professors, Jacob Gersen and Jeannie Suk, describe the interpretation most succinctly as a “bureaucratic sex creep.” Reynolds adds that it has become “a regulatory Tower of Babel governing sports teams, student discipline and even, and most dubiously, sexual consent.”

Here’s how Title IX has worked out so far. A University of Kentucky professor sang the Beach Boys’ California Girls and was punished for “sexual misconduct” because the lyrics were sexual in nature. And according to The American Interest:

[C]olleges are enlisting student resident assistants (typically, senior students who live in lower-class dorms) as “mandatory reporters” of possible Title IX violations, including “harassing remarks” they might hear…

The resident assistants are instructed to not be selective about what information they report to the authorities. They are to pass along to superiors anything they see or hear that could potentially run afoul of the growing web of sexual harassment rules and regulations: “RAs should be ‘funnels of information’,” a Title IX bureaucrat told the Chronicle. “Don’t try to sift and sort. Is this Title IX? Is this not Title IX?’ Let the Title IX administrator do that.”

So, instead of ensuring a female isn’t passed over team selection simply because of her gender, Title IX has been interpreted to go after protected speech and even consensual sexual acts. The possibilities are endless as Reynolds theorizes:

Perhaps policies that discriminate against fraternities could become grounds for loss of funding based on discrimination. (Especially if university officials use derogatory sexist terms like ”frat boy.”) Perhaps admissions criteria that lead to student bodies that are disproportionately female could be analyzed for discrimination under “disparate impact” theories. Perhaps a sexual assault program that produces overwhelmingly male defendants despite evidence that women are equally likely to be perpetrators might be seen as prima facie evidence of sex discrimination by universities.

There is a common-sense solution to all of this, as Reynolds notes, and that is, letting law enforcement handle sexual assault allegations and start viewing free speech, sexual or otherwise, as opinion and not “discrimination” or “microaggressions.” And if Donald Trump’s administration can’t somehow get college administrators to honor the constitutional rights of its students and to cease Title IX abuses, then perhaps America will realize how important calling an Article V Convention of States is in reining in these bureaucratic overreaches.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

December 16, 2016

Professor’s ingenious e-mail signature puts whiny eco-myth libs to shame

Next Post

December 21, 2016 Elementary school cancels Christmas play after “God bless us, every one” offended two people

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does the Bible say about rest?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Avoid rest God rested on the seventh day Only rest when you're old Rest is evil