To help shrink the government, perhaps it’s time to shrink the presidency

Last updated on: August 5, 2016 at 7:39 am by Mark Meckler

To help shrink the government, perhaps it’s time to shrink the presidency 2016-08-05T07:39:13-06:00 Mark Meckler

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Embed from Getty Images

A shrinking government is the best kind of government. Unfortunately, the U.S. government isn’t shrinking, it’s growing. And the task of just controlling that growth is daunting. But what would happen if we shrunk the presidency? How might that put the federal government on a better course?

A University of Tennessee law professor has a few ideas. Noting the horrendous state of politics today as Americans are faced with two terrible choices for president, Glenn Harlan Reynolds makes the case that if the president had less power and celebrity, maybe a different kind of leader would emerge.

He writes for USA Today:

It’s hard to look at Clinton and Trump and seriously believe that, out of a nation of more than 300 million people, these are the very best two people to lead the country….

Trump and Clinton — like every presidential candidate before them in my lifetime — are products of a grueling and demanding multistate, multimonth evaluation process. And yet it’s hard to say that this process, for all its demands, is doing a good job at finding good presidents. Instead, it filters for people who are good at winning primary elections, which doesn’t have much to do with actually governing as chief executive.

The next question is how. There are many options but which one would really work? Reynolds makes a few suggestions: limit the presidency to governors only, who’ve actually had a chance to serve in an executive capacity in government. Eliminate the popular vote and let the Electoral College interview the applicants instead of them embarking on national campaigns. Or just draw straws, lottery style.

But as Reynolds points out, none of those truly addresses the problem.

“The presidency as it exists today is a mess,” he writes. “Presidents have too much power, too little accountability and too high a public profile. That makes the job attract the wrong sort of people, and then ensures they’re not up to it.”

I agree… and I guess you won’t be surprised that I’ll add this: The true solution is the Convention of States.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

August 2, 2016

The DNC's pathetic reaction to recognizing the Holocaust

Next Post

August 5, 2016 Court reverses rule that favored women in campus sexual assault allegations. Here’s why that’s fair

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Uncategorized

Select a Month July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said: "I have much to write to you, but I do not want to use paper and ink. Instead, I hope to visit you"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Peter John (the elder) James Paul