Wearing William Penn’s Hat

Last updated on: May 2, 2014 at 10:27 am by Eric Teetsel

Wearing William Penn’s Hat 2014-05-02T10:27:36-04:00 Eric Teetsel

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Tonight, the Manhattan Declaration visits Philadelphia. I’ll be speaking on religious liberty at the National Constitution Center, along with an outstanding list of friends. As I finalized my remarks here on the Amtrak, I was reminded of a story I first read in Michael W. McConnell’s Harvard Law Review article The Origins and Historical Understanding of Free Exercise of Religion. The story is of William Penn and his hat.

In 1670, in England, the namesake of the commonwealth of Pennsylvania was called before the court to face an indictment for speaking to an unlawful assembly. (A Quaker meeting, actually.) Men of the time wore hats, which were required to be removed in deference to the authority of the court. Penn’s religious convictions forbade such a gesture, so he came to court bareheaded in a magnanimous attempt to avoid any further tension between his convictions and the authorities. But the judge, fully aware of Penn’s religious scruples, ordered an officer to place a hat on his head, and watched to see what Penn would do.

Stylin’

Penn refused to doff the hat. Though he was acquitted of the original charge, he was held in contempt and imprisoned.

Friends, the world wants to put a hat on your head. But, in the words of the Manhattan Declaration:

“because we honor justice and the common good, we will not comply with any edict that purports to compel our institutions to participate in abortions, embryo-destructive research, assisted suicide and euthanasia, or any other anti-life act; nor will we bend to any rule purporting to force us to bless immoral sexual partnerships, treat them as marriages or the equivalent, or refrain from proclaiming the truth, as we know it, about morality and immorality and marriage and the family. We will fully and ungrudgingly render to Caesar what is Caesar’s. But under no circumstances will we render to Caesar what is God’s.”

Religious Freedom

Previous Post

April 22, 2014

"Haven't You Read?" Answering a modern-day Pharisee

Next Post

March 31, 2015 Straightforward Answers about Indiana's RFRA Law

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Life Marriage Politics Religious Freedom Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 April 2015 March 2015 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 September 2013 June 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 November 2012 October 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz