Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Nonreligious
The Bible Clearly Says…NOT!

The Bible Clearly Says…NOT!

Last updated on: April 14, 2020 at 6:58 pm by Derrick Day

The Bible Clearly Says…NOT! 2020-04-14T18:58:24-07:00 Derrick Day

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In my last installment, I explained why I am no longer a bible/scripture literalist. In this post, I want to take on one of the most common — albeit ridiculous — positions:

“The Bible Clearly Says…”

So many times, especially in the realm of social media, this variation of the logical fallacy of “appeal to authority” is trotted out in an attempt to silence or discredit a plethora of opinions and positions. The bible is also a go-to to support “confirmation bias,” which is the offspring of “cognitive dissonance.”

The truth is, the bible doesn’t clearly say anything. The bible is not a single, authoritative tome; it is a collection of loosely federated, subjective, and culturally biased books and letters. Adding to the confusion is that when these books and letters were canonized into a single volume, the biases and opinions of the editors were introduced.

Then there’s the issue of scholarship derived from or based upon the bible. There are entire institutions of higher learning dedicated to specific interpretations of the bible. Moreover, it is very common to find only highly-degreed graduates of these institutions leading local bodies (“churches”) of their denominational bent.

I am no longer one to cite scripture to support my theses so I will paraphrase in this case.

When Jesus said, “And I, and if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all men unto me,” what was he talking about?

One camp will say that if we persistently preach and praise (lift up) Jesus, that will draw all men unto him (to be proselytized and converted and, therefore, “saved”).

Another camp will say that Jesus, in context, was speaking of the judgment of the world, therefore, he couldn’t have been speaking of people. Indeed, that word, “men” is italicized because it was added by the translators for readability. This camp concludes that the judgment of the world was absorbed by Jesus.

Still another will say that if his “lifting up” pertained to his crucifixion, then all men have been drawn unto him — this is an essential point for those who subscribe to universal salvation.

I will neither draw a conclusion nor give my opinion on this passage of scripture; I merely cite it to prove a point. There are 31,102 verses in the King James bible. So, if we assume just 3 interpretations for any given passage of scripture, that means we have at least 93.306 potential ndividual interpretations. Now imagine the combinations and permutations when you begin to “exegete” scripture!

There are groups that believe that baptism is essential to salvation and there are those who see it as non-essential. There are those who believe humanity still remains under part of the law and others who believe we are under grace. All told, this variation of interpretation has resulted in over 40,000 christian denominations.

And even these do not completely agree internally! So much for the “five-fold” (more on that in another installment) bringing about unity.

I’m also tickled by people who question your “exegesis” or accuse you of “eisegesis.” At the end of the day, because all scripture is viewed through the cultural, chronological, or cognitive lens of the reader. Which reduces the chance of objectivity to near zero.

Here’s the problem, most people do not study for themselves. Humanity, loving the path of least resistance, prefers to be spoon-fed. Critical and analytical thinking, on one hand, seems to be reserved for academicians; on the other hand, some purported scholars eschew thought in favor of whatever they’ve been taught to hang their doctrinal hats upon.

When folks cite scripture to prove a point, a modicum of intellectual honesty would cite this as their own personal opinion, not an empirical truth. I think the vast majority simply resorts to rote regurgitation of what they’ve been taught, reducing themselves to spiritual parrots.

Bottom line — there is no such thing as doctrinal purity or flawless hermeneutics; it’s all situational. And true exegesis is a myth; it’s all eisegesis. You shouldn’t need a ThD to interpret what God has to say to humanity. I don’t believe God will hold us accountable to the contents of book that few can agree upon.

And I’m glad about it.

Previous Post

April 8, 2020

Why I No Longer Believe in Scriptural Inerrancy

Next Post

April 22, 2020 Death...And Ignorance

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category agnostic antitheist antitheist atheistic antitheist atheistic theist gnosticism Love Minus Religion Politics and Policies of Love Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 March 2026 January 2026 December 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 September 2023 November 2022 October 2022 April 2022 February 2022 January 2022 October 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 January 2021 November 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Hosanna" mean?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Praise God Save us Come quickly He reigns