Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Love, Joy, Feminism

Home
Nonreligious
No, No, I Didn’t Mean HIT Her!

No, No, I Didn’t Mean HIT Her!

Last updated on: September 9, 2020 at 7:19 am by Libby Anne

No, No, I Didn’t Mean HIT Her! 2020-09-09T07:19:40-04:00 Libby Anne

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The Sola Sisters on Facebook posted a critical list of characteristics of Christian patriarchy. Patriarchal blogger Lori Alexander posted a point-by-point response to this list by blogger Michael Foster. Foster argues that patriarchy does not devalue women, and that the Sola Sisters’ list is a mischaracterization. Foster, however, falls short of actually making this case, in large part because he actually believes the things the Sola Sisters say he does, such as that God has put husbands in authority over their wives.

At the end of his post, Foster wrote:

P.S. This whole list is stupid. And if you think it reflects patriarchy… well, you are at the very least naive and unread.

Let’s take a look at one particular item on the list, because it was the one that struck me the most. First, here it is on the Sola Sister’s list:

The husband has the right to demand and/or force his wife to submit.

That seems pretty straightforward, right? It’s actually something that comes up more often that you might think, in conservative circles. The husband is the head of the wife, and the wife is to submit to his leadership—but what if she doesn’t? What if she refuses to obey him? What should he do then?

Remember, the Sola Sisters are describing the beliefs of what they call the “patriarchalism” movement. They’re talking about people like Lori Alexander, and Foster. (More mainstream evangelicals might say that the wife should submit, but that she should do so voluntarily and that the husband should not force the issue.) The Sola Sisters say that this movement—“Christian patriarchy”—teaches that husbands have the right to “demand and/or force” their wives to submit.

And remember, Foster says that the Sola Sisters’ list is “stupid” and that those who think it reflects “patriarchy” are “naive and unread.”

Here is Foster’s response to this specific item:

An authority can and should require submission to biblically just actions to anyone God has placed under their leadership. All authorities should exercise their office with wisdom and skill. A husband should not attempt to physically force his wife to submit.

I’m having trouble figuring out what the difference is here.

The Sola Sisters say that patriarchalists like Foster believe that husbands have the right to “demand and/or force” their wives to submit. Foster says no, that’s not so. Husbands have the right to require their wives to obey, but *checks notes* should not use physical force. Huh.

Serious question: What exactly does that mean? How exactly does a husband “require” his wife to obey him, according to Foster? Foster does not elaborate in any way. Is the husband supposed to attempt to use reason? Religious guilt? Emotional manipulation? Should he withhold money from her? Take away her clothing? Confine her to the house? What exactly does Foster suggest?

Also, and this is important: “requiring” your partner to submit to your commands is abusive, whether or not you use physical force. Foster seems to see physical force as the dividing line. Husbands can and should use whatever means available to them to make their wives submit to them—but no, no, he’s not suggesting that they hit their wives! They should definitely not do that!

Foster’s framing brings three things to mind.

First, the fact that Foster feels he needs to speak so firmly against domestic violence to ensure wifely submission feels like an admission that there are patriarchal Christians out there who do interpret Bible verses about male headship and wifely submission in that way. And that’s concerning.

Second, if you find yourself insisting that you don’t mean husbands should hit their wives, you really need to take a step back and ask some fundamental questions about exactly what it is you’re saying that would suggest that might even be an option.

Third, Foster’s framing suggests to me that he thinks abuse is limited to physical violence, and is unaware that physical violence is only one kind of abuse. If husbands don’t hit their wives, he seems to think, there’s nothing there for the Sola Sisters to take issue with—right?

But remember what the Sola Sisters actually wrote:

The husband has the right to demand and/or force his wife to submit.

They said that patriarchal Christianity teaches that the husband as the right “to demand and/or force” his wife to submit. In other words, the Sola Sisters saw demanding that your wife submit as a problem whether or not it was accompanied by force. In responding that husbands should require their wives to submit, Foster didn’t contest the Sola Sister’s description of his beliefs—he confirmed it.

I cannot overstate how broken the patriarchal movement’s view of relationships is. This is so broken and messed up and unattractive, and yet these people claim to have some sort of good news to share with the world. They even seem to think that what they’re selling is somehow attractive. It’s mind boggling.

I have a Patreon! Please support my writing!

Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism

Patriarchy

Previous Post

September 8, 2020

No, Traffickers Are Not Abducting Millions of Children to Harvest Their Essence

Next Post

September 10, 2020 To Theocracy, or Not To Theocracy

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atheism Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism Family Feminism Homeschool Meta Parenting Patriarchy Politics Purity Quiverfull Social Justice Uncategorized Worthwhile reads

Select a Month February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

"______ is the same yesterday and today and forever."

Select your answer to see how you score.

Our Calling God's Plan The Universe Jesus Christ