Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Love, Joy, Feminism

Evangelicals Can’t Have It Both Ways on Race

Last updated on: May 26, 2020 at 2:29 pm   by Libby Anne

Evangelicals Can’t Have It Both Ways on Race 2020-05-26T14:29:31-04:00 Libby Anne

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Remember Eric Metaxas? He’s an avidly pro-Trump evangelical author and radio host. Some time back, I wrote that the pro-Trump children’s books he’d written reminded me of—well—Nazi children’s books. I explained why, and Metaxas subsequently got mad at me on twitter.

Today, I have some advice for Metaxas—don’t tweet things like this:

BREAKING: Just now Joe Biden tried & failed to walk back his “You ain’t black comment” by saying “Sho nuff you is fo shizzle ain’t black! Cuz Massa Trump be fixin to put all y’alls behinds back in chains! You done got yo sefs no choice in dis hyah. And that’s a FO sho fo sho!”

Really, really don’t. As quite a few twitter users pointed out, this is essentially the twitter version of blackface. It’s gross and it’s racist. It’s just so gross. Don’t do this. 

As Hemant Mehta wrote:

This is why there’s no conservative version of The Daily Show. Conservatives aren’t funny or clever. Their response to a racist comment is to be waaaaaay more racist. Unlike Biden, Metaxas hasn’t apologized. That tweet is still up. He’s just retweeting supportive comments now.

Metaxas did eventually delete his original tweet—either that or it has been removed by twitter. There is no walking back or apology to be seen on his timeline, however, and his retweets of supportive tweets are still up, along with this defensive tweet. Metaxas was being “humorous” and “sarcastic” and making a “joke” his supporters say.

That’s what white people said blackface was, too: a “sarcastic” exaggerated portrayal of black people’s mannerisms, features, and patterns of speech in order to put on a “humorous” show. It wasn’t funny.

The most charitable interpretation of Metaxas’ tweet is that rather than actually “thinking Blacks talk like this” his’ “joke” was that “Biden thinks Black people talk like this.” This is not a sufficient explantation, of course. As another twitter user noted, while Metaxas’ intent may have been “to showcase biden placating black people,” his tweet showed “disregard for black people by playing into minstrelsy in order to mock both us and biden.”

It doesn’t matter what “joke” Metaxas was trying to make with his tweet, he managed to tweet something that was both racist and evoked memories of historic racist minstrelsy at the same time. Not cool! It’s absolutely the case that everyone makes mistakes. I wouldn’t be at all so hard on Metaxas if he had listened, apologized, and purposed to do better. But he didn’t. He didn’t do that at all.

And here’s the kicker: Metaxas’ tweet came only days after he argued that liberals need to acknowledge that efforts to combat racism are based in the Bible:

Those of us who are Christians have to understand that anybody who’s against racism, anyone who is against slavery, anyone who’s against any of this bad stuff, you know, you can use that to explain to them, yes, and guess why you’re against that? Guess why this culture knows racism is wrong? We got it from the Bible.

And by the way, that’s a fact. You don’t need to like it, you don’t need to be a Christian, but that’s a historical fact. There’s no way around that, that the idea of abolishing slavery, the idea that slavery is wrong, all these ideas worked their way through history and they come from Scripture.

If you’re going to argue that you’re super anti-racist—in fact, that anti-racism stems from your religious tradition and your religious tradition alone—you need to at least act like it. That means listening when people said you messed up, it means doing research and asking questions until you understand, and it means making a change. 

I’m not sure whether Metaxas realizes this, but his response to pushback against his tweet has ensured that the exact the people he wants to target with his “did you know that opposition to racism comes from the Bible” line probably won’t listen to a word he says on the subject—he has shot his credibility on this all to hell.

I get that it’s uncomfortable to have a mistake you made called out, but doubling down when you made a mistake isn’t going to erase the mistake you made, or make people suddenly conclude that you didn’t make one. I actually think there’s more room in our culture than people sometimes think for honest mistakes and genuine learning. The real problem is when people make a mistake and then refuse to learn, or even to listen.

If Metaxas truly cares deeply about black people and about combating racism, he should want to listen when people tell him that something he has said is racist or deeply harmful. He should want to listen, so that he can stop saying things that perpetuate racism or cause harm. Instead we get this.

Oh, and by the way, while we’re at it, what Metaxas misses in his comments on the history of abolitionism and anti-racism is that, in the antebellum South, support for slavery also came from the Bible. Both pro-slavery proponents and abolitionists based their arguments on the Bible and the will of God. This was also the case during the civil rights movement, where African Americans drew on the Black church to argue against segregation while white southerners argued that the Bible said God created the races to be separate, and that miscegenation was evil.

You know what? It’s bad form to care more about whether your forebears did the right thing than about doing the right thing yourself. If you’re going put a lot of emphasis on your forebears getting something right—and use it as some sort of “gotcha” point—you should probably put some energy into making sure you get it right as well.

I’ve been pondering this ever since I ran upon the question on twitter: If white evangelicals believe so strongly in original sin and human depravity, why do they insist with such vehemence that nothing they do or say could possibly be even the tiniest bit racist? Is racism not a sin? And if it is a sin, why do they think they are exempt?

And no, I haven’t forgotten about Joe Biden’s comments. On that subject, I’d point you here.

I have a Patreon! Please support my writing! 

Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism

racism

Previous Post



May 24, 2020

Some Christians Are Using the Pandemic as an Anti-Gay Trojan Horse

Next Post



May 27, 2020 Individual Conversion Stories Aren't As Impressive As You Think


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atheism Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism Family Feminism Homeschool Meta Parenting Patriarchy Politics Purity Quiverfull Social Justice Uncategorized Worthwhile reads

Select a Month February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who built an ark to survive the great flood?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Enoch Shem Abram Noah

Related posts from Love, Joy, Feminism

Nonreligious

Maybe Let's Not Read More Puritans

Love, Joy, Feminism

Nonreligious

Feminists, Repent!

Love, Joy, Feminism

Nonreligious

"So Your Problem with Christianity is the Jesus...

Love, Joy, Feminism

Nonreligious

No, the "Second Shift" Isn't Feminism's Fault

Love, Joy, Feminism

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Nonreligious

Dethroning Jesus and Enthroning Yourself

Jesus Never Asked to Be Worshipped. He Asked to Be Understood. Christianity...

Why Most Christians are Really Paulians and Jobians

I Don't Care, But It Matters Let's get this out of the...

Essential Tips to Successfully Navigate the Selling Process

Selling a house can feel overwhelming, but it doesn’t have to be....

To Make Remote Work Effective, Think About Others

The COVID-19 pandemic forced many companies to rapidly transition to remote work....

Flexibility Is Key to Solving Problems of Tomorrow

The world of work is undergoing a dramatic transformation. The COVID-19 pandemic...

view all Nonreligious blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube