Did Joseph Sin When He Lied to His Brothers? Fundamentalists Ask the Darndest Questions

Last updated on: April 23, 2020 at 5:00 am by Libby Anne

Did Joseph Sin When He Lied to His Brothers? Fundamentalists Ask the Darndest Questions 2020-04-22T18:32:10-04:00 Libby Anne

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Did Joseph Sin in Hiding His Identity? This is the question posted by Troy Lacey in a recent piece for the young earth creationist organization Answers in Genesis.

Lacey was referencing the story of Joseph of the coat of many colors fame, who, once established as a powerful official in Egypt, concealed his identity from his brothers when they came from Canaan looking for food during a drought. (Joseph’s brothers, remember, had sold him into slavery in Egypt because they were jealous of his status ass their father’s favorite.)

If this seems like a lot of hair splitting, it absolutely is. It’s a story. What’s the big deal? What’s actually going on here? Let me slice and dice it for you.

Fundamentalist Christians like those at Answers in Genesis frequently inveigh against “situational ethics” and moral relativism. They argue instead that morals are absolute: that right is always right and wrong is always wrong. For example, lying is wrong, period. It is never, ever okay to lie. Some may find this level of certainty comforting. It makes finding answers easy. It completely mucks up reality, however. For example, was it moral for people hiding Jews during the Holocaust to lie to Nazi officials?

As a child, I was told a story about a Christian who believed that lying was always wrong. When Nazis searched their home and demanded to know the whereabouts of the Jews they suspected were hidden there, told the truth: “They’re under the table,” he said. And they were—under the floorboards under the table. The Nazis assumed he was pulling their leg, because they could all see there was no-one under the table, so they left, and the hidden Jews were saved. See! It all worked out! He didn’t have to lie!

Tea Party candidate Christine O’Donnell echoed this same idea when she was interviewed by Eddie Izzard in 2010. O’Donnell founded a group she named Savior’s Alliance for Lifting the Truth (SALT), which is, I assume, what led Izzard to this line of questioning:

IZZARD: What if someone comes to you in the middle of the Second World War and says, ‘do you have any Jewish people in your house?’ and you do have them. That would be a lie. …

O’DONNELL: I believe if I were in that situation, God would provide a way to do the right thing righteously. I believe that!

MAHER: God is not there. Hitler’s there and you’re there.

O’DONNELL: You never have to practice deception. God always provides a way out.

God always provides a way out.

Now it’s time to return to Joseph. Fundamentalists’ discomfort with justifying lying even to save actual lives from literal death squads should offer some context for Lacey’s interest in whether Joseph’s actions constituted lying and malicious deceit. Did Joseph sin, when he hid who he was?

I should probably pause to note another layer of what’s going on here: Lacey is reading a Jewish text and interpreting it through his Christian lens of what morality is. As a result, he’s asking questions that are weird. The Old Testament is riddled with characters who are deeply flawed. Consider David’s dalliance with Bathsheba, for example. There are many, many characters and stories that are fraught with gray. This isn’t a problem for many Jews (I’m trying to avoid talking in absolutes here), because the idea that even God himself is fallible and makes mistakes is not at all incompatible with Judaism.

It’s Christians who look at things in black and whites, and fundamentalists sin particular. I suspect that’s one reason so many fundamentalists like to fob off the blame for David’s actions on Bathsheba—they want to count David as one of the good ones, and they don’t like their heroes to exist in shades of gray. People are good, or they are bad. (This may be a slight overgeneralization, but fundamentalists do like to put people in “good” and “bad” categories, and they don’t like nuance or loose ends.)

So. Joseph. Lacey begins his piece as follows:

The charge has been labeled against Joseph by some who say that Joseph was spiteful (if not actually vengeful) here, and at the very least, he was cruel to them by hiding his true identity. There are also some Christians who believe that omitting detail is the same as lying. There are those who therefore claim that Joseph was actually lying to them about his identity, while there are others who do not view this as lying, nor being maliciously deceptive.

I don’t remember every considering whether Joseph’s actions his brothers were immoral. It was a story in the Bible like so many other stories; I probably heard it first in flannelgraph. I don’t remember ever analyzing this story in any particular depth.

Before we turn to Lacey’s conclusions, let me refresh your memory.

Joseph is in charge of distributing Egypt’s grain during a famine. Joseph’s brothers come to buy grain in Egypt, as there is no food in Canaan. They do not recognize him, so he pretends to be a stranger. He accuses them of being spies. They say they are not spies but twelve brothers, with one left in Canaan with their father and one dead. Joseph says he’s going to test whether this is true by keeping one of their number in prison and sending the rest back to return again with the youngest brother.

When the food they take back from Egypt runs out, Joseph’s brothers return, bringing their youngest brother, Benjamin. Before they leave, Joseph has his silver cup planted in Benjamin’s bag of grain. After they leave, he sends his men after them; they find the cup in Benjamin’s bag and drag the brothers back to Egypt. Joseph says he is going to keep Benjamin as a slave.

Joseph’s brothers beg him not to, and offer themselves in Benjamin’s place, which is rather the point—Joseph was testing his brothers to see if they had changed. Joseph and Benjamin were the only sons of their father’s favorite wife, and after Joseph was gone Benjamin became his father’s favorite. Once they offer their lives to save Benjamin from slavery so that he can return to their father, Joseph knows his brothers have changed.

Now that I look at the story, Joseph definitely does lie. He doesn’t just lie, he also practices deceit—he has his silver cup planted in Benjamin’s bag! I don’t actually have a problem with Joseph’s actions because I don’t ascribe to a black-and-white Christian morality that holds that these things are always wrong. But if you’re going to argue that lying is always wrong, well, that’s definitely present.

So, what does Lacey conclude?

So motivationally, we can see that Joseph was not out for revenge or seeking to do what he could to spite his brothers. His “deception” was not malicious, nor do we ever see Joseph act hatefully to his brothers, even after their father died 17 years later. Concealing his identity was prudent given the circumstances, and Joseph’s endgame was to bless his brothers, not repay evil for evil. While it may be tempting to view this as a case of situational ethics, where the (supposedly harsh) means justify the ends, that is not the case at all. The means were not wicked, just cautious, and the outcome was definitely loving.

I … what.

No, I’m sorry, but this is definitely situational ethics.

As soon as you get into arguing that the motivations matter more than the action itself*, you are doing situational ethics.* And I’m okay with it! I think all ethics are situational on some level! But don’t play with words like that and pretend you’re not doing what you’re very obviously doing!

Incidentally, I just looked back through the passage and I don’t see any statement of Joseph’s motivations in it. Sure, we could conclude based on the outcome that he was lovingly testing his brothers—but we could also conclude, based on his actions, that he started out with some interest in revenge, or at least in tormenting his brothers before revealing who he was.

Frankly, taking revenge out of Joseph’s motivations entirely and arguing that he acted purely out of love and a desire to bless his brothers makes the story far less interesting—and realistic. Joseph suddenly feels less like a human being and more like some sort of cardboard cutout. But then, maybe that’s rather the point: fundamentalist Christians like cardboard cutouts better than human beings.

I have a Patreon! Please support my writing!

Uncategorized

moral relativism

Previous Post

April 22, 2020

"Pro-Life" Lt. Gov: "There are more important things than living"

Next Post

April 23, 2020 Island of Aquarius: Meet the (Completely Impossible) Cult

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atheism Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism Family Feminism Homeschool Meta Parenting Patriarchy Politics Purity Quiverfull Social Justice Uncategorized Worthwhile reads

Select a Month February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What is the main Christian group in Ethiopia called?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Baptist Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church Assemblies of God Pentecostal