Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Love, Joy, Feminism

Home
Nonreligious
Republicans’ New Climate Change Plan Is All About Deflection

Republicans’ New Climate Change Plan Is All About Deflection

Last updated on: February 12, 2020 at 1:20 pm by Libby Anne

Republicans’ New Climate Change Plan Is All About Deflection 2020-02-12T13:20:52-04:00 Libby Anne

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Per Vox:

There is a convenient story about Republicans and climate policy circulating in Washington, DC, right now.

It goes like this: After years of denying climate science and under pressure from young voters, Republicans have finally turned to the task of designing policy to address climate change. They are developing measures in line with conservative ideals that will focus on markets, shrink the federal government, and avoid picking winners and losers. With such a policy offering, voters will have a choice between two different approaches to solving the climate crisis, rather than a choice between a party that wants to address the problem and one that doesn’t.

This story is convenient for conservatives because they have exhausted the strategy of lying about climate science and need something new to replace it.

As Vox further explains:

Denial has helped confuse the conversation and delay action in the US for 30 years, but the tide of public opinion is finally turning against it — and so is the opinion of younger Republicans. “Climate denial is a bad political strategy,” says 37-year-old Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL).

I’d note that saying climate change is “a bad political strategy” is not the same thing as actually turning against climate change denial. But okay! Some Republicans are realizing that climate denial is “a bad political strategy” and that maybe—just maybe—they need to actually do something about climate change. The problem, of course, is that Republicans are simultaneously in the middle of a sordid love affair with the oil, coal, and fracking industries—and they’re not interested in getting dumped.

That makes the Republicans’ plan … uninspiring.

Notably, the plan includes nothing about solar and wind power, which replace coal and natural gas; nothing about electric vehicles, which replace gasoline vehicles; nothing about efficient buildings or heat pumps, which replace natural gas furnaces; nothing about hydrogen, which can help replace fossil fuels in industrial processes.

What could justify these strange priorities? This is the argument Rep. Garret Graves, a Louisiana Republican who is leading GOP climate efforts, uses: “Fossil fuels aren’t the enemy. It’s emissions. So let’s devise strategies that are based on emissions strategies, not based on eliminating fossil fuels.”

I’m not sure how you can talk about emissions without talking about fossil fuels, but apparently the Republicans think you can.

As one reporter put it:

When a bathtub is overflowing, common sense says to turn off the faucet before mopping up the floor.

Exactly this. It’s bizarre to think that it makes any sense to address emissions without decreasing the use of fossil fuels.

What exactly is going on here?

From where I’m standing, the central issue is the Republicans’ alliance with the oil and gas industry. Let’s take a look.

There is an argument to be made that decreasing the use of fossil fuels could threaten our standard of living in the west and stymie efforts in the developing world to improve living conditions and decrease global poverty. This isn’t the argument the Republicans appear to be making, but it’s one they could make—and may start making.

There are two problems with this argument. No, three.

First, the consequences of climate change will hit the global poor harder than any other group. As a result, any claim that fossil fuels are good because they will help raise developing countries out of poverty ignores the fact that this use comes with dire consequences—consequences that will hit these precise countries hardest of all.

Second, our options aren’t fossil fuels or no energy. We can, though the development of new technology, find other sources of energy that aren’t reliant on fossil fuels. Will this be hard? Sure! But Republicans love to tout our nation’s history of innovation, pointing to our nation’s many inventors and their willingness to think outside the box.

I can imagine a world where Republicans are big promoters of alternative energy development, promoting our nation’s ability to innovate and invest. I can imagine a world where Republicans race to prove that our nation can best every other country in coming up with technological solutions. But we don’t live in that world. Why? The only thing I can think of is Republicans’ love affair with the fossil fuel industry.

I did say there was a third problem with any argument for continued reliance on fossil fuels. Well, there is. Fossil fuels are limited. They aren’t infinite. Someday they will run out. We’re eventually going to need to find alternatives—so why not start now? All the more reason to get out ahead of the problem and prove our nation’s continued place as top innovator.

The Republicans plan is … trees.

Look, I’m all for trees! Trees are super important. I am a huge fan of trees. But trees aren’t going to get us out of this mess, particularly if there’s no attempt to address continued fossil fuel usage.

I really can’t see any other conclusion than that Republicans’ alliance with the oil and gas industry is in the driver’s seat here. There’s no other explanation for Republicans’ lack of interest in innovate alternative energy solutions. Nothing has actually changed here. Republicans don’t actually suddenly care about climate change. They’ve just realized outright denial no longer looks good. So they’ve found a solution that allows them to go on pleasing the oil and gas energy while pretending to care. It’s all about deflection.

I have a Patreon! Please support my writing!

Politics

environmentalism

Previous Post

February 9, 2020

Lesbian Duplex 262: An Open Thread

Next Post

February 12, 2020 Answers in Genesis: Resource Consumption Is the Best Way to Protect the Environment

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atheism Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism Family Feminism Homeschool Meta Parenting Patriarchy Politics Purity Quiverfull Social Justice Uncategorized Worthwhile reads

Select a Month February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

In the Parable of the Wedding Banquet, who accepts the invitation?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Only the king Priests Nobles Unexpected guests