Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Love, Joy, Feminism

Home
Nonreligious
“The Church” v. “The Churches” in Early Christianity

“The Church” v. “The Churches” in Early Christianity

Last updated on: December 12, 2019 at 5:00 am by Libby Anne

“The Church” v. “The Churches” in Early Christianity 2019-12-11T14:42:13-04:00 Libby Anne

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

You know what? I came upon a tweet lately that got me thinking about the discrepancy between these two New Testament passages:

Galatians 3:28—There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free man, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus.

Ephesians 5:22-24—Wives, be subject to your own husbands, as to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, as Christ also is the head of the church, He Himself being the Savior of the body. But as the church is subject to Christ, so also the wives ought to be to their husbands in everything.

These don’t seem to line up. Is there no distinction, and all are one in Jesus, or are women to be subject to their husbands as they are to Jesus? The first passage suggests radical social egalitarianism. The second passage does the exact opposite, repeating itself for emphasis. And, strangely, these books are both written by the same exact person—Paul. Or are they?

Actually, most scholars do not believe Paul wrote Ephesians. There are a lot of seeming discrepancies among the ostensibly Pauline epistles that resolve themselves when you accept the scholarly consensus about who did—and did not—actually write these letters.

Paul probably did write Galatians. He probably did not write Ephesians. How do scholars determine that? Well, for one thing, the writing style in Ephesians is substantially different from that in the books scholars are fairly sure Paul wrote. His word choice also varies far more widely than it does between the other books. And—well—there are theological inconsistencies between Ephesians and the other letters.

And no, I’m not talking just about the above discrepancy over gender relations. I’m talking about other issues entirely. For instance:

[T]he eschatology of Ephesians is much more realized than that of authentic Paul. The expectation of the coming of Jesus has faded into the background and the church is more concerned with growing up or becoming mature. Paul’s thought is dominated by eschatology; Ephesians is not. Paul very rarely speaks of the universal church, but the universal church is a major (possibly the major) theme of the letter.

Wait what now? The universal church?

I just took to an online concordance and … while Ephesians includes reference after terence to “the church,” the other books written in Paul’s name do not (with the exception of Colossians, which scholars also do not think Paul wrote). The difference is so stark it almost surprises me that I didn’t notice it before.

In the books scholars believe are authentic, Paul writes about “the church in this place” and “the church in that place.” Or, extremely commonly, the churches.

2 Corinthians 12:13—How were you inferior to the other churches, except that I was never a burden to you? Forgive me this wrong!

Galatians 1:2—and all the brothers and sisters with me, To the churches in Galatia.

1 Thessalonians 2:14—For you, brothers and sisters, became imitators of God’s churches in Judea, which are in Christ Jesus.

And then there is Ephesians:

Ephesians 5:24—Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands in everything.

The church?

As the church submits to Christ?

That isn’t Paul. Instead, it’s reflective of a later authorship, coming from a period when the church had become more settled—had begun to think of itself as the church rather than as a collection of churches.

Scholars believe Paul wrote his letters between 50-60 AD. He died in 64 AD. Scholars believe Ephesians was probably written around 80-90 AD, and that the pastoral epistles—which advise women to be submissive and obedient keepers of the home—were written still later, around 100 AD.

About the pastoral epistles, recall that those books also include the requirement that a bishop be the husband of one wife, which stands in contrast to not only Paul’s own singleness but also his suggestion that singleness was the ideal state, and that people should marry only if they can’t keep it in their pants. Recall, too, that the pastoral epistles’ discussion of how the church should be set up—the church—came from a very different place from Paul’s insistence elsewhere that Christ’s return was immanent.

Suddenly, Ephesians 5:22-24 makes more sense, as does the sharp contrast between it and Galatians 3:28, which emphasizes a radical egalitarian ethos. Not only were the two epistles written by two different men, each with their won set of beliefs, but Ephesians was also written decades later, during a time when some Christian leaders were trying to reign in what they saw as egalitarian excesses.

Imagine that.

I’ve said it before but it’s still true—I find the Bible more interesting as an atheist today than I did as an evangelical Christian. Or perhaps the issue is that I find it interesting on a different level. I used to comb it for theological truth; I read it daily, and sought to make it my life’s guide. But since losing my faith, it’s like I’ve been handed tools for understanding it on a level I could not before. I don’t have to try to reconcile passages that seem contradictory, or milk a theological point out of confusing text. Instead, I can understand the why behind it. Textual criticism is a truly heady rush.

I have a Patreon! Please support my writing!

Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism

Previous Post

December 11, 2019

Race and Class in Women's Suffrage Cartoons

Next Post

December 13, 2019 Stepping Heavenward: In Which God Dispenses Chronic Pain

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atheism Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism Family Feminism Homeschool Meta Parenting Patriarchy Politics Purity Quiverfull Social Justice Uncategorized Worthwhile reads

Select a Month February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Ezra read the Book of the Law to the people from morning until noon.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE