Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Love, Joy, Feminism

Home
Nonreligious
Is There Hidden Meaning in the New Testament?

Is There Hidden Meaning in the New Testament?

Last updated on: November 21, 2019 at 9:20 am by Libby Anne

Is There Hidden Meaning in the New Testament? 2019-11-21T09:20:49-04:00 Libby Anne

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Answers in Genesis has a series taking on Bible contradictions, but one of their most recent entries—Are Paul’s Letters Hard or Easy to Understand—left me confused. In this post, they broke down (and solved, of course) a Bible contradiction that I don’t think I have ever heard mentioned before:

An alleged contradiction is said to occur between 2 Corinthians 1:13 and 2 Peter 3:16. One passage states that what was written could be understood, and the other states that there are things which are hard to understand. Is this an irreconcilable contradiction?

Say what now?

I guess I expected a series reconciling Bible contradictions to focus on contradictions that are particularly egregious, or well known. This just seems like hair splitting.

What are the two verses?

2 Corinthians 1:13—For we are not writing any other things to you than what you read or understand. Now I trust you will understand, even to the end.

2 Peter 3:16—As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things, in which are some things hard to understand, which untaught and unstable people twist to their own destruction, as they do also the rest of the Scriptures.

This really does not feel like a contradiction. But bear with me, because in my confusion over why Answers in Genesis even felt the need to address this “contradiction” I noticed something profoundly interesting.

Paul, who wrote 2 Corinthians, tells his readers that he is “not writing any things to you other than what you read or understand.” In other words, he says there are no secret meanings in his writings.

But you know what? I tried reading 2 Corinthians 1:13 in context and found myself utterly confused as to what Paul was trying to say. Why is this? It’s in part because he’s writing to people he’s met, and he keeps vaguely referencing things that happened while he was with them. Paul founded the church at Corinth. A few years later, he wrote them this letter. He’s building on things he already taught them—things we don’t have access to—which can sometimes make his letter difficult to understand for us today.

While 2 Peter claims to have been written by the Apostle Peter, it refers to Paul’s letters—which would have been contemporaneous—as “scripture.” For that and other reasons, scholars think 2 Peter was written between AD 100-150 and is pseudoepigraphical—i.e., it only claimed to be written by the Apostle Peter.

With this understanding of the timeline, the passage in 2 Peter makes complete sense. By the time we arrive at AD 100-150, Paul has been dead for decades. We know that the early church was a time of divergent sects and argument between different Christian theologians or church leaders. There was actually much more theological diversity in the early church than there is in Christianity today—and every one of these groups would have been claiming to base their beliefs and teachings on Paul.

It makes perfect sense that the person who wrote 2 Peter would reference “untaught and unstable people” who “twist” Paul’s letters “to their own destruction, as they do all the rest of scriptures.” He’s intervening in a period of great theological dispute. He’s insisting that he is Paul’s true theological heir, and that all those other people saying Paul’s letters mean something else are wrong.

Now, fundamentalists like those at Answers in Genesis don’t leave room for pseudoepigraphical books. If 2 Peter says it was written by the Apostle Peter, by golly, it was written by the Apostle Peter. In this sense the larger contradiction is Peter’s reference to Paul’s writings as “scripture,” which would have been completely ahistorical—not even evangelicals dispute that the Bible canon wasn’t settled until much later.

Even from a fundamentalist standpoint, though, claiming there’s a contradiction between these two verses still feels like splitting hairs. Why not assume that Paul said he was being straightforward in his writing, and Peter noted the obvious—that some people were twisting Paul’s writings to mean things they didn’t?

This really feels like missing the forest for the trees.

When I read 2 Peter 3:16 today, my response is fascination. Disagreement over Christian doctrine—doctrine I’d been taught to think of as obvious or settled—occurred so early on that the canonical books of the Bible themselves refer to the swift divergence of disparate Christian sects.

This makes me genuinely curious what else I would find if I reread the letters in the New Testament today, as a nonreligious adult with some training in the classics, rather than as an evangelical teen. I wonder whether fundamentalist insistence in taking these passages literally and refusing to read them historically actually flattens them, erasing meaning that might otherwise jump out at the reader.

I have a Patreon! Please support my writing!

Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism

Previous Post

November 20, 2019

The Eclipse of Truth

Next Post

November 22, 2019 Stepping Heavenward: What Does an Egalitarian Marriage Look Like?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atheism Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism Family Feminism Homeschool Meta Parenting Patriarchy Politics Purity Quiverfull Social Justice Uncategorized Worthwhile reads

Select a Month February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who rebelled with 250 men against Moses and Aaron?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Abihu Nadab Dathan Korah