Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Love, Joy, Feminism

Home
Nonreligious
How Lara Spencer’s Laughter Limits Boys

How Lara Spencer’s Laughter Limits Boys

Last updated on: August 26, 2019 at 8:22 am by Libby Anne

How Lara Spencer’s Laughter Limits Boys 2019-08-26T08:22:09-04:00 Libby Anne

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In a news broadcast last week, ABC Good Morning America co-host Lara Spencer made the following comments about England’s six-year-old Prince George:

In addition to the usual first or second grade things like math, science, and history, the future king of England will be putting down the Play-Doh to take religious studies, computer programming, poetry, and ballet among other things. Prince William says George absolutely loves ballet. I have news for you, Prince William. We’ll see how long that lasts.

Spencer finished her report laughing, because a boy taking ballet is apparently that funny. In fact, the very moment she got to the word “ballet” she took on an affected tone—as though a boy taking ballet was that ridiculous.

After her words came in for swift criticism—no surprise there—Spencer apologized on Instagram for her comments:

“My sincere apologies for an insensitive comment I made in pop news yesterday,” she wrote in conjunction with a picture of an open field and outdoor skyline. “From ballet to anything one wants to explore in life, I say GO FOR IT. I fully believe we should all be free to pursue our passions. Go climb your mountain – and love every minute of it.”

I’m reminded of an incident that happened to me earlier this summer that I’ve been unable to get out of my head.

I have a son who is about Prince George’s age. This summer, when I went to the gym, I checked him into childcare. You know the basic setup—parents can drop their kids off play with toys and activities under the watch of several gym childcare employees while they work out, retrieving them afterwards.

One day this summer, as I walked into the childcare room to sign my son in, one of the childcare workers greeted my son by name and then added:

“What do you want to play with today? We’re playing with barbies over here, but you probably won’t want to play with that!”

I cringed, but I let the comment go and didn’t stay anything. The longer it has stuck with me, though, the more I think I should have said something.

If I had said something, the childcare worker, like Spencer, would have almost certainly have apologized (there would also have been a pseudo employer-employee dynamic in play, which wouldn’t have given her much room for anything else—so maybe I was right not to say anything). The childcare worker would have added that my son could absolutely play with barbies if he wanted to, perhaps with the same adamance of Spencer’s “GO FOR IT.”

There’s a problem with this whole setup, though. By the time the apology arrives, it’s already too late. The damage has already been done.

Prince George almost certainly had no exposure to Spencer’s comments, but other boys his age likely did. And in my situation, my son heard the idea that he might play with barbies dismissed out of hand, with a laugh—as though it was ridiculous, or something unheard of. Even an apology doesn’t make that initial impact disappear, especially when we’re talking about fast developing children.

Even if, on his arrival at childcare, my son had been inclined to join the girls in playing with barbies, he’s almost certainly not going to now.

One frustration I’ve encountered, as the parent of a boy and a girl, is that while girls are increasingly encouraged to try boy-coded things, boys are still actively discouraged from doing girl-coded things. My daughter can play basketball, but if my son takes ballet he’s treated as weird. My daughter can wear shirts adorned with science themes, but god forbid my son wear a pink shirt with hearts on it.

My son took ballet when he was younger. And he wears leggings, which we have to purchase out of the girls’ section. In fact, I buy a lot of his clothes out of the girls’ section, because shirts in the boys’ section are covered in tonka trucks and other things he’s not into. I try to stay away from anything “too” girly, though, because I don’t want him to get teased by the other boys at school—or by anyone else. So he wears a lot of peach tank tops with owls on them, that kind of thing.

My son plays soccer obsessively, and spends time setting up elaborate cities using matchbox cars and brio trains. Most of his friends are boys. But what frustrates me is the extent to which the gender binary still defines boys’ lives. I don’t want my son to be a girl. I want him free to pick and choose what he likes, without adult women laughing at him when he picks the “wrong” thing.

I want to live in a world where it is as acceptable for boys to play ballet as it is for girls to play basketball. I want to live in a world where a boy can wear a pink shirt with hearts on it without worrying about whether someone will laugh at him.

Spencer’s laughter—and that of other women like her—serves to constrain boys’ choices and to keep them within a narrowly defined acceptable masculine and to prevent them from engaging in “girly” behavior. Rather than a mere apology, I want a sustained effort to listen, understand, and create change going forward.

I have a Patreon! Please support my writing!

Feminism

gender

Previous Post

August 25, 2019

Lesbian Duplex 238: An Open Thread

Next Post

August 27, 2019 What Is a Racist?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atheism Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism Family Feminism Homeschool Meta Parenting Patriarchy Politics Purity Quiverfull Social Justice Uncategorized Worthwhile reads

Select a Month February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Daniel interpreted King Nebuchadnezzar's dream about a statue made of different metals.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE