Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Love, Joy, Feminism

Home
Nonreligious
Why Paid Maternity Leave and Subsidized Childcare Are Not Enough

Why Paid Maternity Leave and Subsidized Childcare Are Not Enough

Last updated on: December 26, 2018 at 5:00 am by Libby Anne

Why Paid Maternity Leave and Subsidized Childcare Are Not Enough 2018-12-20T21:21:36-04:00 Libby Anne

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

“South Korea Is Trying to Boost its Birth Rate,” read a City Lab article published this past summer. “It’s Not Working.” I was curious. The U.S. is famous for being one of the only developed countries without paid maternity leave, and our lack of subsidized childcare is a well-known problem for working mothers. Other developed countries frequently offer these benefits and more. Why weren’t these policies working for South Korea?

This is a feminist issue. When people decry the decline of (white) birth rates in the U.S.—“millennials aren’t having children”—I frequently point to the lack of child-friendly policies like paid maternity leave or subsidized childcare. But if we’re going to point to holistic solutions—solutions that give women who would like to have children the resources they need to do so—we need to know why women in a country like South Korea are having fewer children despite having access to these resources and then some.

As the article explains:

On paper, the South Korean parental safety net puts countries like the U.S., which offers no guaranteed maternity leave and is cutting funding for the poorest children, to shame. But in terms of boosting the birth rate, the government’s decade-old pro-natalist policy has yet to move the needle. This year, South Korea is expect to clock in at fewer than one birth per woman this year. In Seoul, it’s even lower: Last year, the rate was only 0.94 births per woman.

For one thing, the article explains, the child allowance isn’t sufficient to cover the full costs of raising children, and public daycare facilities have long wait lists. But there are other problems, problems that have nothing to do with government policies—problems that can’t be fixed by government subsidies. These problems have to do with the workplace:

But money and access to child care is hardly the only barrier to boosting births, University of Derby’s Sung-Hee Lee says. She points out that the government’s emphasis on opening more day cares also reflects something else in South Korean society: the primacy of work over family. “Why should we need 12 hours of free child care?” she asks. “This is crazy. Parents should have the time to look after their children.”

…

One mother recounts the emotional struggle of choosing her job over her son, who’s now four years old. “Work usually ends at 6:30 p.m., but it’s hard to leave when your boss is still there,” 39-year-old Hye Jin-Jeong, who works in the HR department for a major retail company, says through an interpreter. She’s referring to a concept known to Koreans as nunchi, which, among other things, refers to the unspoken rule that employees should stay in the office until their bosses leave. The practice is not uncommon despite the government’s recent attempts to limit the workweek from 68 hours a week to 52.

“When my son started talking, he would often ask me why I came home so late and tell me how lonely he was,” Hye says. “At the time, I felt like I had to choose between earning money and being with my child, and I felt really guilty.”

It doesn’t matter how much you pay women to have children—how much paid childcare you offer or how much paid maternity leave—if you have a work culture that demands that your employees stay at work till all hours, you are going to have a problem with your fertility rate.

Despite all of our problems in the U.S. with childcare access and lack of paid maternity leave, I feel suddenly grateful. Here, at least in certain segments of our workforce, companies want to be known as family-friendly. Offering work-from-home days and family-friendly sick leave policies keeps workers happy, creates a positive workplace culture, and helps retain talent. I have had the opportunity to see what this looks like firsthand, and it is amazing.

I am hopeful that millennials will be able to change U.S. workplace culture more or less permanently by demanding more worker-friendly and family-friendly workplace policies. And even where these policies have yet to be enacted, we benefit from a far shorter workweek.

Back to South Korea, with its far longer workweek. The City Lab article includes interviews with multiple women on the pressures they felt in the workplace after having children—and the expectation that they would leave the workplace and focus on childrearing.

Keum-Lee’s sister, Young Hwa-Lee, has managed to keep her position as the secretary to the head of the food company Shin Dong Bang Corp., but it wasn’t easy, “When I had my first child, I didn’t feel the discrimination much,” the 45-year-old mother of two says through an interpreter. “But when I had my second child and came back from maternity leave, people looked at me strangely—as if to question why I would want to return after having two kids.”

Half of working mothers refuse maternity leave, due to these pressures. The South Korean government may be working to ensure that women can keep working after having children—with childcare and maternity leave—but without change in workplace culture—the long workweek and expectation of putting work over family—these efforts can only go so far.

Many workplace expectations that may have worked when men worked outside of the home and had wives who stayed at home to care for children and do household work do not work in a world where both men and women work outside the home—and want to continue doing so. If those expectations don’t change, women will change their actions, and have fewer children.

That goes for the U.S. as well as South Korea.

The next time I hear someone complaining about millennials not having children, I’ll make doubly sure my response is dual—we need both childcare subsidies and paid maternity leave, and family-friendly workplace cultures. Women need to know that they can have children without passing up promotions or being pressured to put work over family.

The City Lab article also points to a third issue:

It’s these kinds of deep-seated cultural habits that have proven stubbornly resistant to government policies and kid-friendly investments. Making South Koreans make more babies isn’t just about more funding or better access to subsidized child care—it’s about changing “the societal image [of motherhood] and the pressure keep women shackled to her child,” says Hwa-Lee.

That we definitely have in the U.S. as well—the pressure to be a super-parent, the mommy wars, the expectation that mothers give up their identities and become Mommies—and, of course, the belief that women who “dump” their children in daycare are bad moms.

Paid maternity leave and childcare subsidies are necessary, but they are not sufficient. If we want to create a world where every woman who is interested in raising children has the resources and space to do so effectively (and sanely), there is work to be done.

I have a Patreon! Please support my writing!

Previous Post

December 25, 2018

Today We Celebrate a Pregnant Middle Eastern Teenage Girl

Next Post

December 27, 2018 Explaining in the Guise of Listening: A Review of Josh Harris' New Documentary

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atheism Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism Family Feminism Homeschool Meta Parenting Patriarchy Politics Purity Quiverfull Social Justice Uncategorized Worthwhile reads

Select a Month February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who became David's closest friend, even though he was Saul's son?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Shimei Abner Ish-bosheth Jonathan