Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Love, Joy, Feminism

Home
Nonreligious
Ed Stetzer Will Listen—Unless You Were Hurt by the Church

Ed Stetzer Will Listen—Unless You Were Hurt by the Church

Last updated on: December 17, 2018 at 5:00 am by Libby Anne

Ed Stetzer Will Listen—Unless You Were Hurt by the Church 2018-12-14T22:35:42-04:00 Libby Anne

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Last week, Ed Stetzer wrote an article in Christianity Today titled All Faith Groups, Evangelicals Included, Need to Reflect on #MeToo. Much of what Stetzer writes is excellent, but ultimately his treatment falls short of fully addressing the problem—far short.

Here’s a sample of the excellent in Stetzer’s piece:

Every account of sexual abuse inside and outside our churches must be addressed properly, and this begins with the critical element of belief. We believe those who are wounded and promise to care for them as Christ cares for his church.

Finally, we must properly address the muddied waters of power that have slowly seeped into our church structures. The saying “absolute power corrupts absolutely” is a truism that has found its place in too many of our churches.

Things like “the good ol’ boys club” among pastors, priests, leaders, elders and the like, must be broken down, in their place rising up a leadership that accepts accountability, lives with integrity, and walks humbly with God and others.

The problem happens when Stetzer writes this:

Some will say that evangelical beliefs are the problem, and we particuarly understand that may come from some who have been hurt by evangelical churches. But, like the Roman Catholic Church has seen, it is often Catholics who can help other Catholics to begin change in their community— and we are trying to help do the same in ours.

Can you see the bait and switch? Actually, there are two bait and switches. So many bait and switches.

Stetzer uses the fact that some critics of evangelical belief were harmed by evangelical churches to dismiss their criticism of evangelical beliefs. He never actually addresses their criticism. He simply dismisses them out of hand, arguing that evangelicals need to be the ones to fix evangelical problems, not ex-evangelicals. He does not address the fact that some of these critics are still evangelicals—or the reality that it should not matter what they are.

This is perhaps most maddening because Stetzer finishes with this:

There’s no greater agony than bearing an untold story. It’s time for the church to start listening. It’s time to say that this stops with us.

Where are we supposed to see the listening in the midst of Stetzer’s sound dismissing? I sure don’t see it. I see Stetzer listening only to those he wants to listen to. Many of those Stetzer dismisses for “having been hurt by evangelical churches” are exactly the people he should be listening to—the victims of the abuse Stetzer so insists that he wants to prevent.

But there’s another piece of this too. Stetzer wrote that these critics “say that evangelical beliefs are the problem.” That’s not quite right. The critics Stetzer references tend to argue that some aspects of current mainstream evangelical belief are a problem and need to be changed. They typically argue that there are better ways to conceptualize these beliefs—and there are many evangelical reformers among this number, working to reform evangelical theology.

Stetzer ignores all of this nuance, alleging simply that these critics “say that evangelical beliefs are the problem.” This only makes sense if Stetzer is stating with finality that the patriarchal family order is an incontrovertible evangelical belief. Or that the idea that when an abuser repents, his sin is washed away and can never be mentioned again. Or that only “he who is without sin” should “cast the first stone.” In rejecting wholesale the words of critics, Stetzer affirms the very beliefs they criticize—and proves his efforts hollow.

After all, Stetzer calls for believing “those who are wounded,” but proceeds to dismiss those who have been wounded. He calls for breaking down “the good old boys’ club” and notes that “absolute power corrupts absolutely,” but wholesale rejects the idea of questioning or rethinking the aspects of evangelical theology that support these structures.

Stetzer finishes by promoting Wheaton College’s “Reflections” summit, a one-day conference on abuse in the church that took place last Thursday. On the same day that the conference took place, Charlotte, a survivor of abuse in the evangelical church, wrote an article on Medium registering concerns bout Stetzer’s conference, bringing up his own words:

This conference is meant to give the illusion that they care about survivors and fixing the problem; in reality they only care about protecting themselves and their privilege. Just yesterday, Ed Stetzer wrote an article in Christianity Today where he said “Some will say that evangelical beliefs are the problem, and we particularly understand that may come from some who have been hurt by evangelical churches.” Portraying anyone who disagrees with evangelical theology as “hurt” or “bitter” is a common tactic meant to discredit our ideas and experiences.

It’s time to start listening, Stetzer writes. Except for those who were hurt by the church. Those Stetzer is not interested in listening to. Those he will dismiss. Only evangelicals can fix this problem, he says—and they can fix it on their own, thank you very much.

So much for listening.

I have a Patreon! Please support my writing!

Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism

#churchtoo

abuse

sexual abuse

Previous Post

December 16, 2018

Lesbian Duplex 202: An Open Thread

Next Post

December 18, 2018 Conservative: "Hate Has No Home Here" Signs Are Cause of Division

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atheism Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism Family Feminism Homeschool Meta Parenting Patriarchy Politics Purity Quiverfull Social Justice Uncategorized Worthwhile reads

Select a Month February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What Persian king chose Esther as queen?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Xerxes (Ahasuerus) Cyrus Artaxerxes Darius