Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Love, Joy, Feminism

Home
Nonreligious
Evangelical “Parable of the Caravan” Takes a Bizarre Turn

Evangelical “Parable of the Caravan” Takes a Bizarre Turn

Last updated on: November 12, 2018 at 5:00 am by Libby Anne

Evangelical “Parable of the Caravan” Takes a Bizarre Turn 2018-11-08T09:40:50-04:00 Libby Anne

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Last week, prominent evangelical theologian and Christianity Today blogger Ed Stetzer published an article by Kent Annan, director of humanitarian and disaster leadership at Wheaton, titled “The Parable of the Caravan.” I was hopefully when I saw this headline, because Stetzer has a reputation for criticizing problematic views on issues like race or abuse. My excitement soon turned to disbelief.

Annan sets out to write what he calls “a modern-day parable.” Jesus’ parables, he says, are meant to “hold up a mirror” and “puncture our delusions.” That is what he means to do with his own parable.

Once upon a time, the world’s most powerful kingdom enjoyed a record-low unemployment rate and record-high stock market prices.

Other countries much poorer were hosting millions of refugees, but this kingdom did all it could to keep these refugees out. Then one day, a thousand miles away, a few thousand people in danger in their own land joined together with the unrealistic dream of walking—yes, walking—a thousand miles to safety and jobs in the powerful, far away kingdom.

Moms and dads and children joined this “Caravan,” though even if they somehow made it to the kingdom, they had no way past the wide moat, towering wall, thick gate, and vast army that awaited them.

Meanwhile, behind the kingdom walls, people watched this faraway Caravan on their screens.

So far, so good. In fact, so far, very good.

The person concerned about safety saw the Caravan on the TV as a ragtag group of vulnerable, unarmed, powerless people made up of moms and dads, sons and daughters. He felt a tinge of empathy, but then squinted hard to look through the decoder lens provided by politicians and TV pundits.

What he saw then was a group of well-armed, well-fed, highly-trained mercenary invaders better disguised than anyone had ever been disguised. He thought, We need our troops and weapons to protect us from these attackers in disguise. He heard the ruler of the kingdom promise to protect the border from these invaders, so he felt safe. The next time he saw the Caravan on TV, he clicked on by.

While Annan gives this person a serious benefit of the doubt, we’re still on relatively solid footing thus far.

A virtuous Facebooker flipped past the Caravan on screen and thought, Let them in. Whatever it costs, someone else will pay the price, and I can claim the virtue. Saying ‘yes’ will feel good without having to do anything hard to help these people in need.

She could righteously ignore those who lost a loved one in a crime, who live near the border and face cultural upheaval and economic change, who teach these children in crowded classrooms and have to buy supplies out of their own pocket, or who house an asylum-seeking family. My duty here is done, she thought. She “liked” helping the Caravan without needing to pause beyond her screen to help.

What?!

Look, I’m not saying there’s not room to criticize those who never take their activism off facebook—however large their numbers may actually be (far lower than Annan would guess, I suspect)—but this is not that. In Annan’s writing, the “person concerned about safety” is allowed to have empathy for the caravan. Not so, the “virtuous Facebooker.” The “virtuous Facebooker” is motivated only by a desire to look good. Empathy does not enter the picture.

The “virtuous Facebooker” comes off worse than the “person concerned about safety,” despite the fact that the “virtuous Facebooker” wants the U.S. to open its doors to the migrant caravan while the “person concerned about safety” nods approvingly when the ruler sends troops to the borders.

To top it all off, Annan repeats as fact the claim that immigrants are more likely to be criminal than other individuals, when it is manifestly not true. Immigrants are actually less likely to commit crime than other groups. Annan also references cultural upheaval and economic change. What does that mean, exactly? Immigrants grow economies, and communities undergo cultural and economic change over time irrespective of whether immigrants settle there (I’m looking at you, rust belt).

Finally, I didn’t even realize until I googled it just now that “crowded classrooms” is an anti-immigrant talking point prominent among the alt-right and white nationalists. So we’ll just pat Annan on the back for repeating and reinforcing a xenophobic anti-immigrant talking point.

With that, let’s finish the parable:

A religious person went past the scene on his laptop screen and then quickly to his Holy Book, flipping past the verses about a (similar?) caravan escaping through a miraculously parted Red Sea, past caring for widows and orphans, until he found comfort in verses about respecting authority and remembered a verse (though he couldn’t find the actual location in the Holy Book) that says, “Just take care of your own. Because if everybody is your neighbor, then nobody is.” So now that we’ve taken care of this threat to our conscience, he thought, let’s get back to a debate that doesn’t ask us to love our poor neighbors. And he clicked on by.

Even this person gets a warmer treatment than the “virtuous Facebooker.” Sure, he looks through his Bible until he finds a verse that makes him feel better about not doing anything. But at least he wasn’t like the “virtuous Facebooker,” who was motivated only by a desire to look good in front of others!

Annan follows his parable with words of warning for those who fall in each group. Those who see an invading army, he says, should learn to accurately assess the dangers, and give their fears to God. Annan then calls out false claims, noting that refugees are rarely terrorists, and adding this:

Studies show that, overall, communities with high immigrant populations have lower crime than communities without immigrants. Refugees become net contributors to our economy and as tax payers.

Let’s pause here, because I’m confused. If immigrants and refugees have lower crime rates and are economic contributors, and Annan knows that, what is the explanation for the language in his section on the “virtuous Facebooker”? In that section, remember, Annan wrote this:

She could righteously ignore those who lost a loved one in a crime, who live near the border and face cultural upheaval and economic change, who teach these children in crowded classrooms and have to buy supplies out of their own pocket, or who house an asylum-seeking family. My duty here is done, she thought. She “liked” helping the Caravan without needing to pause beyond her screen to help.

If you’re confused, you’re not alone. Annan repeats these falsehoods as truths only to later acknowledge that they are falsehoods. I think I know what’s going on here, and it’s not pretty.

Annan’s “virtuous Facebooker” is a trope taken directly from a Right-wing playbook. Progressives, the argument goes, preen around on facebook making calls to “let them all in,” even though they know immigrants and refugees bring crime, take people’s jobs, and live of public benefits. They just don’t care, because it’s not their jobs on the line, and besides, who cares if immigrants live off public benefits if they’re loyal Democratic voters? My guess? Annan is simply regurgitating this stereotype.

This makes the “virtuous Facebooker” that much worse—she shares pro-immigrant facebook statuses in order to look good in front of her friends, all the while gloating over the fact that other people’s lives, and not hers, will be harmed by these migrants. Does Annan actually know any progressives?

But when Annan does get around to offering a message to the “virtuous Facebooker,” he writes this:

If we look at the Caravan and see an exodus of people escaping oppression but don’t help, then we need discipleship to be more practical in our love. Have we called our senators and representatives, given to someone who is helping with immigration services on the border or addressing the root causes, prayed, found a way to love our neighbors who see the Caravan differently and engaged respectfully to try to change their minds?

So maybe Annan does think the “virtuous Facebooker” has empathy. But if so, why his completely divergent portrayal above? More than that, I’m not sure I know anyone who shares pro-immigrant memes but doesn’t do something more to help. Sure, we can always do more—but this does not feel like it is at all in the same category as the “person concerned about safety” who praises the ruler for sending troops.

My facebook friends have called and recalled their senators and representatives, and yes, they’ve given financially to immigration nonprofits and other efforts. They’ve gone to rallies, and marched. Some have volunteered to work with immigrants; others have donated clothing and other needed items to local nonprofits giving aid to new immigrants (immigrants aren’t just “out there” at the border, after all).

Let’s take a moment, here, to consider what Annan’s “virtuous Facebooker” section does:

First, it gives his readers cover to assume that progressives who are active on Facebook aren’t actually doing anything outside of facebook to help, based on no evidence.

Second, it gives his readers permission to assume that the only reason progressives share pro-immigrant information on facebook is to look good—not because they actually care.

Third, it suggests to his readers that progressives who are supportive of immigrants on Facebook are just as misguided as their uncle raving about an “invasion”—if not worse.

Fourth, it posits that progressives active on Facebook only support immigration because they think it will hurt other people and not them, making them sound like bad people.

Annan seems to genuinely care about refugees and to genuinely want evangelicals to support them. When he turns to the “religious person” who found Bible verses that excused him from helping, he provides a list of Bible references and reminds evangelicals “to remember who our neighbor is and that borders shouldn’t restrict our love.” He has a book coming out about loving immigrants and refugees.

This is the power of the conservative echo chamber. It is so strong that even someone like Annan, who seems to genuinely want evangelicals to support immigrants and refugees, cannot get fully outside it.

I have a Patreon! Please support my writing!

Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism

Politics

immigration

Previous Post

November 11, 2018

Lesbian Duplex 197: An Open Thread

Next Post

November 13, 2018 Does Anyone Know What Racism Is Anymore?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atheism Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism Family Feminism Homeschool Meta Parenting Patriarchy Politics Purity Quiverfull Social Justice Uncategorized Worthwhile reads

Select a Month February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

In 2 Peter, what does Peter say he will soon put aside?

Select your answer to see how you score.

His life His burdens His ministry His job