The Southern Baptist Convention Calls Refugee Crisis “a Great Commission opportunity”

Last updated on: July 11, 2018 at 5:00 am by Libby Anne

The Southern Baptist Convention Calls Refugee Crisis “a Great Commission opportunity” 2018-07-10T16:30:27-04:00 Libby Anne

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

At the Southern Baptist Convention in June, the assembled messengers passed a resolution in favor of welcoming refugees and migrants. As Christianity Today reported at the time:

During this week’s Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) annual meeting, the country’s largest Protestant denomination adopted a resolution reiterating its commitment to refugee ministry and welcoming migrants.

It stated in part, “We continue to ‘encourage Southern Baptist churches and families to welcome and adopt refugees into their churches and homes as a means to demonstrate to the nations that our God longs for every tribe, tongue, and nation to be welcomed at his throne,’” quoting text from a 2016 resolution on the issue.

“I think God is bringing the nations, particularly as immigrants and refugees, to the US to give us an opportunity not just to go to them with the gospel, but so that they could come to us and experience the gospel,” said Micah Fries, who attended the Dallas gathering as pastor of Brainerd Baptist Church in Chattanooga, Tennessee. “My fear is, as followers of Jesus, we’re missing this opportunity. We’re allowing political conversations, political parties, to derail a Great Commission opportunity.”

A Great Commission opportunity.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m glad the Convention came out in favor of welcoming refugees and migrants. This is important! It’s approaching this as a Great Commission opportunity that is rubbing me wrong.

Consider this: Micah Fries suggests that “God is bringing the nations, particularly as immigrants and refugees, to the US to give us an opportunity not just to go to them with the gospel, but so that they could come to us and experience the gospel.” Does this mean that God created the violence in countries like Honduras? Or, to take a more global view—did God create the Syrian civil war to drive the Syrian people into Western countries where they might hear the gospel?

It’s the same logic at hand when evangelicals talk about God using a tragedy to bring you closer to Him—did God engineer or plan the death of a loved one, or a medical problem, or the loss of a home?

The larger problem, of course, is that this sort of resolution makes the issue about the resolution-makers and their goals, and not about refugees and their needs. The resolution calls for Southern Baptist churches and families “to welcome and adopt refugees into their churches and homes as a means to demonstrate to the nations that our God longs for every tribe, tongue, and nation to be welcomed at his throne,” not because it’s simply the right thing to do.

When I was a girl, my parents sponsored local international students. The idea behind the program, run through local churches, was to get international students into individual American homes where they could be exposed to American culture and hear the gospel. For years, international students from around the world were in and out of our house. It certainly made for an interesting childhood! It was a good thing—but there was always an end goal.

The purpose of the program was not cultural exchange, although this certainly did occur. The purpose of the program was evangelization. None of the international students we had in our home over the year were ultimately converted, but it was not for lack of trying. This focus shaped our interactions. Our efforts weren’t simply about learning about another culture. They were about a belief that we had something that these students needed, whether they thought so or not.

As Petticoat Philosopher said when I mentioned the Southern Baptist Convention’s resolution, “They’re not asking these people what they need, they’re telling. … They don’t want to accept them, they want to use them as a means to an end.” And finally: “It’s just colonialism without the bother of travel.”

It occurs to me that there are some parallels between this, and evangelicals’ treatment of LGBTQ individuals. In recent years, a growing number of evangelicals who believe that homosexuality is a sin have adopted a rhetoric of “acceptance” as a means to get close to LGBTQ individuals and fix them—to shape them into what they want them to be. To a certain extent the rhetoric here is similar: accepting refugees in order to evangelize them and re-form them in their image.

Added to all of that is the reality that 90% of Hondurans are Christian (nearly evenly split between Protestant or Catholic). This is a higher percentage than that of the U.S., where only 69% are Christian. But because Hondurans are foreigners and hail from a developing country—well. Clearly they’re prime targets for evangelization.

Again, I’m glad the Southern Baptist Convention adopted a resolution supporting refugees. I just wish the could support refugees, rather than supporting their mission of evangelizing refugees.

Evangelicals like to portray themselves as especially good and especially loving and especially moral. But so much of the time, the good things they do are done for ulterior motives. Accept refugees … to evangelize refugees. Set up homeless shelters … to evangelize the homeless. Be kind and loving to the unsaved … to set them up for evangelization. (I grew up with the idea that if I was especially loving, others would notice and ask, and then I could evangelize them).

And so it is here.

Give me someone who is loving for the sake of being loving, someone who is kind because they want to make the world a better place, someone who supports those in need of help not for any ulterior motive but because it is the right thing to do, and I will take that over this any day of the week.

I have a Patreon! Please support my writing!

Uncategorized

Previous Post

July 10, 2018

Thoughts on Becerra: Do Women Have No Right to Truth in Advertising?

Next Post

July 12, 2018 Ken Ham Plays Fast and Loose with Ark Encounter Attendance Numbers

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atheism Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism Family Feminism Homeschool Meta Parenting Patriarchy Politics Purity Quiverfull Social Justice Uncategorized Worthwhile reads

Select a Month February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who died at the end of Genesis?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Reuben Jacob Simeon Joseph