BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian
Beliefs
- Buddhist
- Catholic
- Contemplative
- Evangelical
- General Christian
- Hindu
- Jewish
- Latter-day Saint
- More Voices
- Muslim
- New Visions
- Pagan
- Progressive Christian
Topics
- Religion News
- Food and Religion
- Sports and Religion
- Religious Art
- Religious Music and Entertainment
- Religious Events
- History and Religion
- Style and Religion
- Politics and Religion
- Women in Religion
- Recreation Outdoors and Religion
- Business Finance and Religion
- Careers Workplace and Religion
- Education and Religion
- Family Parenting and Religion
- Health Fitness and Religion
- Home and Religion
- Relationships and Religion
- Technology and Religion
- Travel and Religion
Columnists
- Buddhist Columnists
- Business Finance and Religion Columnists
- Careers Workplace and Religion Columnists
- Catholic Columnists
- Contemplative Columnists
- Education and Religion Columnists
- Evangelists Columnists
- Family Parenting and Religion Columnists
- General Christian Columnists
- Health Fitness and Religion Columnists
- Hindu Columnists
- History and Religion Columnists
- Home and Religion Columnists
- Jewish Columnists
- More Voices Columnists
- Latter Day Columnists
- Muslim Columnists
- New Visions Columnists
- Nonreligious Columnists
- Pagan Columnists
- Politics and Religion Columnists
- Progressive Columnists
- Recreation Outdoors and Religion Columnists
- Relationships and Religion Columnists
- Religion News Columnists
- Religious Art Columnists
- Religious Events Columnists
- Religious Music and Entertainment Columnists
- Sports and Religion Columnists
- Style and Religion Columnists
- Technology and Religion Columnists
- Travel and Religion Columnists
- Women in Religion Columnists
Resource Library
- 2026 Calendar
- Library of World Religions
- The 100 Most Holy Places on Earth
- Patheos Answers
- Podcasts
- Videos
- Faith Leaders Database
- Anglican Episcopalian
- Bahai
- Baptist
- Buddhism
- Christianity
- Confucianism
- Eastern Orthodoxy
- Hinduism
- Holiness and Pentecostal
- ISKCON
- Islam
- Judaism
- Lutheran
- Methodist
- The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
- New Age
- Paganism
- Presbytarian and Reformed
- Protestantism
- Religion Behind the Scenes
- Roman Catholic
- Scientology
- Shia Islam
- Sikhism
- Sufism
- Sunni Islam
- Taoism
- Zen
- See all religions
Research Tools
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
- Trending:
- Forgiveness
- |
- Marriage
- |
- Consciousness
- |
- Death Penalty
- |
- Election
- |
- Halloween
Love, Joy, Feminism
-
More
- Home
- Nonreligious
- Would a Female SBC President Usurp Authority Over Men? This Framing Is Broken.
Would a Female SBC President Usurp Authority Over Men? This Framing Is Broken.
Last updated on: July 18, 2018 at 5:53 am by Libby Anne
Would a Female SBC President Usurp Authority Over Men? This Framing Is Broken. 2018-07-18T05:53:39-04:00 Libby Anne
Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.
In a Christianity Today article published on Friday, prominent Southern Baptist pastor Dwight McKissic called for electing Beth Moore as president of the Southern Baptist Convention. “[I]f ever there were a time for a woman at the helm of the SBC, it’d be now,” he writes. This call rings oddly hollow, however, elevating symbol over substance.
In the wake of scandal following Paige Patterson, a former Southern Baptist Convention president, McKissic’s call makes a certain amount of sense. But only a certain amount. Consider, for example, that Beth Moore, a prominent Southern Baptist author and speaker with perhaps unparalleled name recognition, speaks exclusively to women because doing otherwise would violate the limits Southern Baptist Convention places on women in ministry.
In the past two decades, the Southern Baptist Convention has limited the role of women in dramatic ways, forbidding them to serve as pastors or ever holding “authority” over men. In his article, McKissic does not propose to change this. In fact, his primary concern centers not on giving women access to the ministry but on getting the Southern Baptist Convention out of the spotlight. At issue is eliminating criticism, not rethinking the beliefs that led to the teachings that took Patterson down.
Have a look at this paragraph, for example:
Imagine for a moment with me, what if the person serving as SBC president at this hour was a competent, accomplished, biblically sound, orthodox female who could address the multitude of questions and issues the SBC is facing regarding women? The criticism and skepticism would be less dramatic if the SBC historically had demonstrated confidence and belief in the gifts and value of SBC women serving at all levels of leadership in SBC institutional life within the boundaries of the Bible.
The criticism and skepticism would be less dramatic if…
McKissic frames criticism and skepticism of the Southern Baptist Convention, and not the Convention’s problematic positions and teachings on gender, as the problem. He’s not calling for creating a church and denominational culture that supports women divorcing abusive husbands rather than urging them to stay, or that supports women who are victims of rape rather than blaming them for their own assaults.
Instead, McKissic is calling for finding a symbolic way to end the criticism and skepticism. He wants a quick and easy fix. He wants to put a woman’s face on the top of the brochure, and shut down the questions. Viola! Problem solved! Except … not. McKissic’s article displays a complete lack of understanding of why people are actually upset.
If you think I’m being harsh, have a look at this section of McKissic’s article:
To say this is a critical hour in the life of the SBC is an understatement. The presidency of the SBC is by design weighted more toward symbolism than governing. There is no budget, personnel, office space, and extremely limited authority that are presumptive or inherent in occupying the office of president of the SBC.
Yes, the SBC president appoints the committee on committees that appoints all of the SBC committees, presides over the annual SBC gathering, serves as an ex-officio trustee of all SBC entities, and serves on the committee on order of business. Yes, the SBC president serves as an official representative of the SBC to the public at large and as a representative to other parachurch or denominational gatherings.
But beyond those responsibilities, the SBC presidency has no decision-making authority. Again, the SBC presidency is largely symbolic, not authoritative. Therefore, a woman would not be usurping authority over a man by serving as SBC president.
McKissic does not get it. He spends his article—ostensibly an article about setting things aright by putting a woman in the top position—assuring his readers that appointing a woman president of the Convention would not mean a woman “usurping authority over a man.” He could hardly be more tone deaf if he were trying.
And look, here’s more:
The SBC is an entity head and trustee-driven governmental system. The SBC president is not an entity head or voting trustee of any of the entities. The president of the executive committee of the SBC, which is a job currently vacant and most recently held by Frank Page, has oversight of a colossal budget and staff and is appointed by the executive committee trustee board.
That position, totally distinct from the office of the president of the SBC, inherently has much more authority than the elective office of the president of the SBC. Clearly, the SBC president has a large “bully pulpit,” if they choose to use it; and a great deal of influence, but very limited constitutional authority. Succinctly stated, the president of the SBC is not a position of inherent authority, but usually widespread name recognition and influence, based on ministry history and convention support.
Curious about McKissic’s position on women in ministry (given his continued insistence that installing a woman as president of the Southern Baptist Convention absolutely did not constitute giving her authority), I did some poking around and found a 2007 article by McKissic on the topic. I also found a 2010 resolution on women in the ministry that he submitted to the Southern Baptist Convention (it was not affirmed).
McKissic writes that “the general rule and practice is that the ministry of teaching/preaching is to be in the hands of men.” However, he also writes that “if a woman gifted of the Holy Spirited with the gift of proclamation or teaching” uses her gift “with the permission of her head (her husband)” and “at the discretion and invitation of the bishop, elder or pastor of a local church” she acts within acceptable biblical limits on her role.
In his article for Christianity Today, McKissic writes about recent cases in which leaders of various Southern Baptist seminaries got in trouble for hiring female professors or for allowing female seminarians to take preaching classes alongside men. McKissic supports the efforts of other leaders who want to open additional ministry-related positions to women (including professorships, preaching classes, etc.).
My intent is not to dissect the ins and outs of conversations and disagreements over gender among leaders of the Southern Baptist Convention. Instead, I want to highlight the reality that even a leader with comparatively liberal views on women in the ministry finds himself in a position where he needs to couch calls for electing a female president of the Southern Baptist Convention with repeated claims that this position holds no authority.
Those in the Southern Baptist Convention want to assure onlookers that they do support women who are abused, and that they do take rape seriously. I very much hope, for the sake of the women in their congregations, that these things are true. However, many of the critics involved in or following the #churchtoo movement contend that the Convention’s view on women in the family—and in the ministry—are interlocked with issues like abuse and rape and cannot be separated.
That, then, is what McKissic does not seem to get—that any defense of the role of women that must couch positions of authority as having no authority in order to open them to women is self-defeating.
I have a Patreon! Please support my writing!
Previous Post

June 10, 2018
Lesbian Duplex 175: An Open Thread
Next Post

June 12, 2018 Doug Wilson Moves the Goalposts on Evidence and Abuse
Browse Our Archives
Select a Category Atheism Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism Family Feminism Homeschool Meta Parenting Patriarchy Politics Purity Quiverfull Social Justice Uncategorized Worthwhile reads
Select a Month February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011
Follow Us!
TAKE THE
Religious Wisdom Quiz
What is the name for the Christian practice of immersion or sprinkling in water to welcome believers?
Select your answer to see how you score.
Ordination Baptism Eucharist Confirmation
Related posts from Love, Joy, Feminism
Maybe Let's Not Read More Puritans
"So Your Problem with Christianity is the Jesus...
TRENDING AT PATHEOS Nonreligious
Dethroning Jesus and Enthroning Yourself
Jesus Never Asked to Be Worshipped. He Asked to Be Understood. Christianity...
Why Most Christians are Really Paulians and Jobians
I Don't Care, But It Matters Let's get this out of the...
Essential Tips to Successfully Navigate the Selling Process
Selling a house can feel overwhelming, but it doesn’t have to be....
To Make Remote Work Effective, Think About Others
The COVID-19 pandemic forced many companies to rapidly transition to remote work....
Flexibility Is Key to Solving Problems of Tomorrow
The world of work is undergoing a dramatic transformation. The COVID-19 pandemic...
view all Nonreligious blogs
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
- About Us
- 2026 Calendar
- Videos
- Podcasts
- Library of World Religions
- Faith In Media Tracker
- Advertise With Us
- Write for Us
- Privacy Policy
- Terms of Service
- Do Not Sell My Data
- Contact Us
- Radiant Digital
- Manage Newsletter Subscriptions
- Unsubscribe From Notifications
- Sitemap
Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.
Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In









