Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Love, Joy, Feminism

Home
Nonreligious
John Piper on Domestic Abuse and Group Sex (Yes, That Combination Is Weird)

John Piper on Domestic Abuse and Group Sex (Yes, That Combination Is Weird)

Last updated on: May 9, 2018 at 5:00 am by Libby Anne

John Piper on Domestic Abuse and Group Sex (Yes, That Combination Is Weird) 2018-05-07T15:38:56-04:00 Libby Anne

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Back in 2009, evangelical heavyweight John Piper published a video of himself responding to this question submitted by a listener:

“What should a wife’s submission to her husband look like if he’s an abuser?”

Piper began his comments with these words:

[Chuckles] “Oh boy. Part of that answer is clearly going to depend on what kind of abuse we’re dealing with here, how serious this is. Is her life in danger?”

This is not an appropriate response to this question.

Also—yes, he really did respond to the question by chuckling.

Perhaps the saddest thing about the whole video is the question that was submitted. What should a wife’s submission to her husband look like if he’s an abuser? The answer ought to be, it shouldn’t. While the entire idea that wives should submit to their husbands is abhorrent to me, it seems on some level like shouldn’t be that hard to include a void clause—and abuse of any kind should seem an obvious candidate. But no.

The person submitting the question assumed that wives are bound to some form of submission even to a husband who is an abuser. Piper never once disabused his listener of her assumption. Instead, he affirmed it.

“Is her life in danger?” he asked. Because apparently that is some sort of standard. Because apparently it is easy to tell when an abuser will snap—and whether an abuser is dangerous. Because apparently things don’t escalate.

After explaining that women are under their husbands’ authority only because they are under Jesus’ authority first and he put him there, Piper headed off in a really strange direction:

“If this man is calling her to engage in abusive acts willingly, group sex or something really weird, bizarre, harmful, that clearly would be sin.”

This is just bizarre. Maybe it’s just me, but I think I can say with some confidence that the individual who submitted this question was not thinking of group sex when asking about marriage to an abusive husband. Is this really where Piper’s mind goes when someone uses the word “abuser”? Straight to group sex?

Furthermore, asking someone to willingly engage in group sex is not abuse. Coercing someone to engage in a sexual act they do not want is absolutely abuse—but why jump to a husband trying to coerce a wife into group sex (if indeed that is what we are talking about) rather than addressing a far more likely situation, like marital rape?

All this weirdness aside, Piper did offer an answer. Because she is only under her husband’s authority because God put her there, Piper explained, a woman whose husband wants her to engage in group sex should make this statement:

“Honey, I want so much to follow you as my leader, God calls me to do that, and I would love to do that, it would be sweet to me if I could enjoy your leadership, but if you ask me to do this, require this of me, I can’t go there.”

Do you see how sweet and nice that little speech is? Piper is once again emphasizing submission. Even a wife who must object to a husband who asks her to sin (and what this has to do with abuse is beyond me) must object in a submissive, quiet manner. She can’t just say no. She can’t just say I won’t do that. Nope. She has to have flowers in her voice.

Finally remembering that the question was about abuse, Piper quickly clarified:

“That’s one kind of situation. Just a word on the other kind. If it’s not requiring her to sin, but simply hurting her, then I think she endures verbal abuse for a season, she endures perhaps being smacked one night, and then she seeks help from the church.”

Eep.

Simply hurting her.

Yes really, that is what he said.

However many times I read it, I can’t get over the word “simply.” Such a little word, really, but it speaks volumes. Asking her to participate in group sex? That’s the big bad! Simply hurting her? Well, you know. Simply.

What was Piper’s solution? The church, he said, should step in and tell the abuser “you can’t do this.” Yes, really—that was the truly and only solution Piper offered. No mention of what to do if the husband didn’t go to the church. No mention of what might happen to an abused woman if her husband finds out she’s been talking to the pastor. No mention of all of the times men prove able to talk themselves out of situations like this.

Why do I address this video now, when it was published in 2009? Well for one thing, this sort of advice is in the public eye right now with the surfacing of similar comments made by Paige Patterson of the Southern Baptist Convention. For another thing, though, Piper still enjoys widespread support within evangelicalism. His words on domestic violence and spousal abuse deserve a public airing every once in a while.

Tomorrow I’m going to address a statement Piper put out in 2012 “clarifying” his statements on abuse. While he allows for a role of the civil authorities in that “clarification,” he also digs his hole deeper.

I have a Patreon! Please support my writing!

Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism

abuse

domestic violence

Previous Post

May 8, 2018

What's Going on with the Southern Baptists?

Next Post

May 10, 2018 Obey. Submit. Obey. John Piper on Domestic Violence.

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atheism Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism Family Feminism Homeschool Meta Parenting Patriarchy Politics Purity Quiverfull Social Justice Uncategorized Worthwhile reads

Select a Month February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was primary method of debt resolution in Biblical times?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Slavery Public trial Fine payment Community service