Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Love, Joy, Feminism

Home
Nonreligious
Abbot: “The problem is not guns. The problem is hearts without God.”

Abbot: “The problem is not guns. The problem is hearts without God.”

Last updated on: May 28, 2018 at 7:49 am by Libby Anne

Abbot: “The problem is not guns. The problem is hearts without God.” 2018-05-28T07:49:30-04:00 Libby Anne

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Leigh Jones titled a recently World Magazine article about the school shooting in Santa Fe, Texas, “Hearts without God.” Jones quotes Texas Governor Greg Abbot’s response to the shooting, but also editorializes, throwing dust on attempts to prevent such atrocities, whether through gun control or through identifying perpetrators in the planning stages.

These are the core paragraphs of Jones’ article:

“Every time there’s a shooting, everyone wants to talk about what the problem is,” [Texas Governor] Abbott said before Tuesday’s school safety roundtable meeting. “By now, we know what the problem is. The problem is innocent people are being shot. That must be stopped.”

But how to stop it remains agonizingly intractable. Pagourtzis used guns to kill two teachers and eight classmates, but he also brought homemade bombs. He snuck the weapons into the school, but he just as easily could have attacked his victims in the parking lot. People who want to kill others will find a way. His journals indicate he planned the attack for months, but he showed virtually no other signs of his murderous intent.

Nearly a week before the Santa Fe shooting, Abbott spoke at the National Rifle Association conference in Dallas. In what now seems like a prescient speech, he summed up the reason legislators can’t stop every killer every time, no matter how many laws they pass: “The problem is not guns. The problem is hearts without God.”

Let’s break this down, shall we?

In the first paragraph of the above section, Abbot states that “every time there’s a shooting, everyone wants to talk about what the problem is,” but that “By now, we know what the problem is. The problem is innocent people are being shot.” The logic here is so bad it is almost laughable. Abbot is constructing a strawman—when everyone “wants to talk about what the problem is” after a shooting, they know innocent people are being shot. What they want to know is how it could happen—and how it can be prevented.

Anyone who responds to the consternation and outrage that follows a school shooting with “we already know what the problem is, the problem is innocent people being shot” has their head in the sand. People know that is the problem. What they’re asking for are solutions. This is not the time for witty rejoinders.

In the second paragraph, Jones writes that “people who want to kill others will find a way.” Once again, there is a major failure in basic thought process. We work to limit nations’ access to nuclear weapons because we know that some weapons are more deadly than others. While it may be true that there will always be some people who act in violent ways, the tools they have at their disposal will have a significant impact on the number of people these individuals will be able to harm or kill.

Anyone who responds to school shootings with “people who want to kill others will find a way” should be asked to explain why such events tend to occur here, and not in other Western countries. One major difference between the U.S. and those countries is the availability of guns and ammunition. Countries which limit access to these deadly weapons—which are, after all, designed to do one thing and one thing only, to kill and to do so efficiently—see lower rates of school shootings, and lower rates of homicide overall.

Jones dismisses all of this, pointing instead to religion. Or, more specifically, to Christianity.

“The problem is not guns,” Jones quotes Abbot saying a week before the Santa Fe shooting. “The problem is hearts without God.” Abbot argues, in other words, that if every person had a heart turned to God—that if every person made Jesus and his will the center of their lives—such violence would end.

This claim is unfalsifiable. It cannot be disproven. Every time someone points to a Christian who commits gun violence, Abbot can simply respond that that individual’s heart was clearly not right with God, because if it had been, they would not have done this act. For Abbot, religion is not about church membership. It is about the beliefs of the heart. And if one cannot both have a heart toward God and commit an act of gun violence, any individual who commits an atrocity will by definition not have a heart toward God.

It’s circular. It’s unfalsifiable. It’s unhelpful.

But let’s assume for a moment that it’s true (even though it’s not). Let’s assume that individuals who make religion the center of their lives—or Christianity specifically—do not commit acts of gun violence. Even were this true, stating that the problem is “hearts without God” is unhelpful because it is impossible to force or require a person to have a heart toward God.

You cannot mandate belief.

Indeed, evangelicals frequently draw attention to the number of young people who leave the faith, sometimes with a tone of near-panic—but if young people leave the faith in such numbers, if even being raised in a religions home does not ensure that an individual will be a person of faith, then religion does not present a realistic solution to the problem of school shootings.

In fact, a contention that school shootings are a result of “hearts without God” ought to make other preventative measures more urgent—because there will always be individuals with “hearts without God.” Indeed, Christian teachings hold that the number of the saved will be small, and Christian leaders portray Christians as a persecuted religious minority.

Why, then, does an unfalsifiable claim that the problem is lack of religious belief—when such belief cannot be mandated—so often forestall conversation about solutions?

Abbot is not the only one to focus on what goes on inside a person. One common response to school shootings is to ask what warning signs of possible psychological disturbance were missed. What was going on inside this person such that they were able to do this? We talk about the importance of having school counselors and other to work with students who are disturbed or at risk of violence.

But we rarely offer that as an only solution, and we rarely use the fact that there will always be disturbed students to justify opposition to other solutions.

Abbot—and Jones—shouldn’t either.

I have a Patreon! Please support my writing!

Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism

school shooting

Previous Post

May 27, 2018

Lesbian Duplex 173: An Open Thread

Next Post

May 29, 2018 Al Mohler: "We thought this was a Roman Catholic problem"

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atheism Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism Family Feminism Homeschool Meta Parenting Patriarchy Politics Purity Quiverfull Social Justice Uncategorized Worthwhile reads

Select a Month February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was healed of leprosy after washing in the Jordan River?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Aaron Naaman Moses Gehazi