Sharing the Gospel Wasn’t as Easy as I’d Thought It Would Be. Here’s Why.

Last updated on: February 27, 2018 at 10:59 pm by Libby Anne

Sharing the Gospel Wasn’t as Easy as I’d Thought It Would Be. Here’s Why. 2018-02-26T22:59:57-04:00 Libby Anne

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Growing up in an evangelical home, I learned early sharing the gospel was one of the most important we could do—a mandate for every believer. I was homeschooled and raised in a church community, and didn’t have much chance to interact with the unsaved until, at 18, I left home to attend a state college. Once there, I ran into some problems. For one thing, having been homeschooled in a fairly insular community, I didn’t know the culture or language of those I was supposed to proselytize.

But there was another problem as well, a more fundamental problem.

I had been taught that the first step of sharing the gospel was to convince someone that they were a sinner. There were various ways you could do this, but the one most widely used was to ask a person if they had ever lied, if they had ever stolen something, etc. Then you tell them that any sin, no matter how small, is worthy of death—that as a sinner, they are bound for hell.

The problem, I soon learned, was that most people didn’t see themselves as sinners. I had been raised to see myself as a sinner, so I certainly did, but most people aren’t. Their entire framework is different. Indeed, the term “sin” itself is becoming increasingly antiquated. Most people agree that they have sometimes done things that hurt others, things they wish the hadn’t done and things they latter had to make up, sure. But sin? What exactly is sin?

There is no universal definition of sin, but it is generally understood as a violation of God’s moral law. Just what is God’s moral law? Some might point to the Ten Commandments, but for evangelicals God’s moral law is far more than that—and the Ten Commandments is itself an odd standard; some prohibitions continue to make sense today while others that don’t. For evangelicals, though, God’s moral law includes things like not having sex before marriage—and a prohibition on homosexuality.

Outside of evangelicalism, most people tend to follow a loose harms-based system of morality. If something does not hurt anyone, it is typically not considered immoral. This includes both premarital sex and homosexuality. A growing number of Americans today—particularly young people—don’t see anything wrong with LGBTQ individuals living their lives like anyone else.

The evangelical is faced with the task of not only convincing people that they are sinners (an increasingly archaic term) but also convincing them that things innocuous things that don’t hurt anyone are sin.

The disconnect isn’t just over what counts as a sin, but also over the appropriate punishment for wrongdoing. We live in an era when people increasingly oppose the death penalty even for grievous crimes. Most of those who are “unsaved”— even if they feel bad about things they’ve done in their lives, and harm they’ve caused—will balk at the idea that eternal torture is a just punishment for, say, stealing a pack of gum as a ten-year-old. The very idea is morally repugnant.

Today, many elementary and secondary schools are trying to move beyond punitive systems for dealing with student misbehavior toward systems of “restorative justice.” Schools try to understand why a student is acting out, and to address the root causes. At the same time, rather than facing punishment as such, the student is guided through taking actions to right the wrongs they have done and be restored to the community. “Crime causes harm and justice should focus on repairing that harm,” one tutorial explains.

The evangelical Christian system functions differently. People are not capable of restoring the harm they have done, according to evangelical theology. If they think they can make it up themselves, they are deluded. The just punishment is eternal torture. But we as a society don’t think like that anymore. We increasingly question a criminal justice system focused on punishment and retribution.

To convert a person, then, an evangelical needs to first convince that person to share their system of morality—and to many people today, evangelicals’ system of morality seems profoundly immoral. What kind of God would sentence people to eternal torture for small offenses? What kind of God would damn people to eternal torture for having sex before marriage? What kind of God would forbid homosexuality? Because those things don’t make sense, most attempts to convert people are going to fall flat.

I did see one girl converted while I was at college—not by me but by some students I knew through Campus Crusade for Christ—and her conversion didn’t follow the methods or process I’d been taught. The girl in question came from a troubled and unhappy home life. She was discontent and searching for something new—something more than what she had had so far. Conversion to evangelicalism gave her a fresh start, it satisfied her feeling of searching, and it gave her access to and an in with an existing social circle.

Watching this girl convert while other students I was getting to know did not—others who were equally without the gospel or salvation—raised questions in my mind. Even then I could see that there were conditions that precipitated this girl’s conversion. Other college student friends I made, despite being unsaved, were perfectly happy where they were. They didn’t feel that something was missing, and they didn’t have a longing for something else. And they certainly didn’t believe they were sinners deserving of death.

Most evangelicals would likely respond to all of this by arguing that the unsaved have deluded themselves. At one point, I believed that too. The unsaved, I thought, lied to themselves to justify their wrongs until their lies deluded them and rendered them unable to see the truth. The problem, I thought, was that people had closed their eyes and hardened their hearts to the truth. Having seen the issue from both sides—I am no longer an evangelical myself—I no longer believe that this is the case.

Growing up, I was taught that the unsaved could not see the truth because they were hedonists who lied to themselves to justify their own sins. Indeed, I was taught that atheists denied the existence of a God because they did not want to be held accountable for their sinful actions—that they wanted to be able to sin with no consequences.

One thing I learned, upon stepping into the world outside of my home church, was that many of those who are “unsaved” practice altruism and believe passionately in causes outside of themselves. The unsaved were not all motivated by hedonism. The unsaved were not all selfish and self-centered. In many ways the unsaved were much like the saved—they invested time and energy into forming relationships, building communities, and improving the world.

Far from “wallowing in sin,” the unsaved were simply operating on a different ethical framework. In order to convert them, evangelicals must convince the unsaved to adopt their ethical framework. Doing this may become increasingly difficult as evangelicals’ ethical system itself comes across as immoral to a society that views premarital sex and homosexuality as natural and legitimate, a society that is increasingly questioning everything from capital punishment to punitive criminal justice systems.

I am no longer surprised that I had such difficulty converting anyone during my college years. I didn’t know the rules of the game I was attempting to play. I was operating on an understanding that caricatured the belief systems of those I wanted to evangelize. Ultimately, almost everything I was taught about the unsaved, growing up in an evangelical home and church, turned out to be untrue.

Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism

Previous Post

February 26, 2018

Answers in Genesis' Tone-Deaf Rainbow Tussle

Next Post

February 28, 2018 How Far Have Evangelical Pastors Come on Domestic Violence?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atheism Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism Family Feminism Homeschool Meta Parenting Patriarchy Politics Purity Quiverfull Social Justice Uncategorized Worthwhile reads

Select a Month February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What Christian denomination is known for circuit riders and revival meetings in America?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Episcopalian Catholic Presbyterian Methodist