Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Love, Joy, Feminism

Home
Nonreligious
Voice in the Wind: Calabah Hatches a Plan

Voice in the Wind: Calabah Hatches a Plan

Last updated on: January 5, 2018 at 5:00 am by Libby Anne

Voice in the Wind: Calabah Hatches a Plan 2017-12-19T20:59:07-04:00 Libby Anne

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Voice in the Wind, pp. 417-422

After their fight, Julia works out that Atretes is going to fight in the elimination match. That sets her to worrying, struck by the sudden fear that he could die. Calabah is there, though, and Calabah does what Calabah does best. She starts by asking Julia whether she’s thought about what would happen if Atretes lives, and gains his freedom.

“I’d marry him if he wanted.”

“You would be so foolish?” she said disdainfully. “He’s worse than Caius, Julia.”

“He’s not. He’s nothing like Caius. He was angry with me because I left him standing in the hallway.”

Oh, Julia, no, honey, no.

“I’m not speaking of his violence, though there is that to consider.”

WTF, Calabah.

“I’m speaking of the way he controls you. His pride gets a little bruised and he leaves. And what do you do? Do you bide your time and what for him to come to his senses and apologize? You should have seen yourself, Julia, running after him. It was embarrassing to see you behave so badly.”

Julia blushed. “I wanted him to stay.”

“Anyone in Ephesus could’ve seen how much you wanted him to stay,” Calabah said. “Just who is it that controls this relationship?”

I actually find this really interesting. Evangelicals often talk about the importance of male headship by asking what would happen without it, and suggesting that the result would be the woman being in charge. There is no space within conservative evangelicalism for marriages where no one is in charge—marriages that are egalitarian and cooperative. In focusing on who “controls” the relationship Rivers plays into this framework, but in putting these words in Calabah’s mouth, she suggests that feminists use the same framework.

Calabah is a straw feminist. The thing is, an actual feminist would respond to situations like Julia’s far differently. The issue isn’t who is in control. The issue is that Atretes is abusive. In contrast to the words Rivers puts in Calabah’s mouth, the problem is not that Atretes is in charge or even that he controls the relationship. The problem is that he’s controlling, manipulative, and violent.

There’s lots more conversation between the two, of course. Calabah tells Julia that she is allowing Atretes to treat her “like a woman of convenience.” Julia insists that it’s not like that. Calabah tells her she’s underestimating her worth—that she is rich and well connected and he is nothing but a slave, and that he should be “honored” that she has chosen him as his lover—“and grateful for every moment you spare him.” She tells Julia that she needs to “put him in his proper place.”

Julia shook her head. “I’m not like you. I love him. I can’t help myself. I can’t give him up because of what I’m afraid might happen.”

Julia needs an intervention. Badly. And Calabah is giving her an intervention, but it’s twisted though both Rivers’ misperception of what such an intervention might look like and Calabah’s hatred for gladiators.

Calabah says that Julia doesn’t have to give Atretes up at all, and begins outlining a plan. She tells Julia that she should marry a man she trusts “implicitly,” a man who will “allow you complete freedom to do as you please.” That way Atretes could remain Julia’s lover, and she would retain control of her property and life—and, Calabah says, when she tires of Atretes Julia can simply send him on his way.

I hope I’m not spoiling too much when I say that Calabah is being disingenuous. She knows Atretes would never agree to such a thing. Remember what I said about this intervention being twisted? Calabah’s purpose is to drive Atretes away from Julia, but without driving Julia away in the process—she needs to make Julia think she’s on her side, with her best interests in mind, trying to help.

Julia is not all that interested in marrying again. She points out that she has been married before “and hated it” and that she doesn’t trust anyone but Marcus. Calabah changes the subject, asking whether Marucs as “loosened the reins or rightened them” during her father’s illness. And here we learn more about how Marcus has been treating Julia.

Julia pressed her lips together. She couldn’t deny Marcus was becoming difficult. In fact, he was becoming all too much like Father. At the last feast she had attended, Marcus had almost dragged her from the room by the arm. He’d swung her into a private chamber where he had accused her of being excessive. When she demanded to know what he meant, he said her behavior among the guests reminded him of Arria. Clearly, he hadn’t meant it as a compliment.

Effing hell, Marcus. Keep your hands off of the women in your life! In the middle of a party Marcus dragged Julia, by force, out of the room, “swung her” into a private chamber, trapping there with him, and gave her a strong dressing down. This, too, is abusive—and remember that Marcus controls her purse strings. Marcus, WTF. How did I ever find Marcus sexy and alluring, reading this book as an evangelical teenager? Marcus is repulsive.

But Calabah is ready for Julia’s objection to marriage.

“You’ve heard of marriage by usus, haven’t you?”

“Simply move in with a man?”

This is the third type of “cum manu” marriage practiced in Rome—Julia has already tried the other two—but as I have pointed out repeatedly, “cum manu” marriage had fallen out of use by this period in favor of “sine manu” marriage. Rivers throws these terms around to make it sound like she really did her research, but if she had, she would know that “cum manu” marriage had fallen out of practice by the 70s AD, and she does not. This form of marriage would not have been an option for Julia.

Calabah tells Julia that marriage by usus would allow her to marry without permission her father or brother’s permission, and that she could dissolve the marriage by walking out of the door if her new husband became difficult.

Calabah leaves some things out. Marriage by uses came with manus. That means that Julia would have ended up under the full control of her husband—but only after a year. A woman could avoid manus by moving out for three consecutive nights once per year, and thus not have her property pass to her husband—but in such a case, her property would still be under the control of her father (or brother, or other male relative), so that is not what Calabah intends. She intends Julia and her property to pass into the control of her new husband. What she doesn’t mention is that this would take a year of cohabitation before this would go into affect (and Marcus would control her money until then), and that if she were under manus to her new husband (in other words, after that first year), she could not simply leave. In addition, marriage by usus was something only plebeians did, not status conscious Roman women like Julia.

Calabah suggests that Julia marry Primus, via usus of course.

“I don’t find him attractive.”

Calabah laughed softly. “It’s highly unlikely he’d be attracted to you either, my dear. Primus is in love with his catamite.”

Julia blanched. “You’re suggesting I marry a homosexual?”

Oh FFS.

The word “homosexual” did not exist in Julia’s language and culture. The concept did not exist. The Romans understood sexuality differently. For them, the important part was not the gender of the person one had sexual relations with, but rather the position one took—men were expected to be in the dominant (penetrative) position. To be treated “as a woman” was considered shameful. Remember what I said about reading things from today onto Ancient Rome? Yep. That’s happening.

While Rivers has botched historical accuracy completely by using the word, she did get at least one thing accurate—Primus’ catamite (whom we will meet later) is an adolescent slave boy.

But Calabah isn’t having any of Julia’s objections.

Calabah looked impatient. “As usual, you think as a child, or one so mired in traditional thinking that you fail to see the benefit of anything else. I’m merely presenting you with an acceptable alternative lifestyle.”

“Alternative livestyle” is a modern evangelical buzz word, but that really seems like the least of our worries at this point. Calabah promises that Primus is “very easily managed” and that he would simply except some financial support—she says he doesn’t gamble and would merely likely a nice villa to live in, in place of the small one he’s currently renting.

Yup, this plan is going to go great.

I have a Patreon! Please support my writing!

Uncategorized

Voice in the Wind

Previous Post

January 4, 2018

Persecuted as Jesus Was Persecuted

Next Post

January 6, 2018 Saturday Link Love: Saying Sorry, Dating Advice, and Killing Coyotes

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atheism Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism Family Feminism Homeschool Meta Parenting Patriarchy Politics Purity Quiverfull Social Justice Uncategorized Worthwhile reads

Select a Month February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What Christian group is known for using the term "General Conference"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Seventh-day Adventists Presbyterians Lutherans Baptists