Evangelicals: Moral Rectitude No Longer Required

Last updated on: December 22, 2017 at 8:21 am by Libby Anne

Evangelicals: Moral Rectitude No Longer Required 2017-12-22T08:21:03-04:00 Libby Anne

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Much ink has been spilled over the last two years over how evangelicals could go from censuring Bill Clinton for having an affair with his intern to lauding Donald Trump, who openly boasted of sexually assaulting women, cheated on his first two wives, and made a habit of walking in on and ogling undressed underage Miss American contestants just because he could. How do we get from there, to here?

In an attempt to answer this question, this graph has got to be one of the most fascinating I have ever seen:

Screen Shot 2017-12-18 at 1.40.36 PM

In 2011 only 30% of white evangelical Protestants agreed that “an elected official who commits an immoral act in their personal life can still behave ethically and fulfill their duties in their public and professional life.” That same year, 44% of the American public and 63% of the unaffiliated agreed with that statement. Five years later, in 2016, a full 72% of white evangelical Protestants now now agreed with that statement, a stunning shift that dwarfed change in any other group.

This means that within five years, white evangelical Protestants went from being the most strict about politicians’ personal lives of any group to being the least strict of any group. And it’s not as though there was some sort of equivalence on the Left—while the unaffiliated did become slightly more strict about elected officials’ personal lives between 2011 and 2016, the change was only 3% (in 2011, 63% of the affiliated agreed with the statement that an elected official could be personally immoral but professionally ethical; in 2016 that number was 60%). Compare that to to white evangelical Protestants’ whopping 42% change.

What is going on here? Some evangelicals think they know.

David Brody, a correspondent for the Christian Broadcasting Network who has co-authored a forthcoming “spiritual biography” of Trump, said many outside observers fail to grasp the desperation and urgency felt throughout much of conservative Christianity.

“The way evangelicals see the world, the culture is not only slipping away—it’s slipping away in all caps, with four exclamation points after that. It’s going to you-know-what in a handbasket,” Brody told me. “Where does that leave evangelicals? It leaves them with a choice. Do they sacrifice a little bit of that ethical guideline they’ve used in the past in exchange for what they believe is saving the culture?”

Apparently it’s really difficult to just answer the question with Trump. Look, evangelicals feeling like the culture is slipping away by itself does not explain this change. They’ve felt like this for a long, long time. There is no reason for evangelicals to change their views on politicians’ personal lives unless they are confronted with a situation where there is someone running for political office who has a sordid past yet somehow still makes evangelicals think that he’s their savior and that rainbows and unicorns are shooting from the sun.

I didn’t have evangelical relatives sending me chain emails urging me to vote for McCain in 2008 or Romney in 2012, but I sure did have evangelical relatives sending me chain emails urging me to vote for Trump last year. For god only knows what reason, evangelicals fell in love with Trump, and obligingly shed their objection to politicians with immoral personal lives. Brody would do better to just admit that, to name names rather than leaving his response faux ambiguous.

White evangelical Protestants decided that politicians’ personal lives don’t matter because Donald Trump, a rich philanderer, promised them that he would fix the country and restore it to its former greatness, and they believed him. End of story.

Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism

Politics

Donald Trump

Previous Post

December 20, 2017

This Is Not What "A Bridge Too Far" Looks Like

Next Post

December 22, 2017 Voice in the Wind: Julia Cares, Y'all

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atheism Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism Family Feminism Homeschool Meta Parenting Patriarchy Politics Purity Quiverfull Social Justice Uncategorized Worthwhile reads

Select a Month February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What animal did Peter see in vision?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Lions Sheep Goats Clean and unclean animals