Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Love, Joy, Feminism

Doug Wilson: The National Anthem Is Required by God, but the Pledge is Socialist

Last updated on: September 27, 2017 at 5:00 am   by Libby Anne

Doug Wilson: The National Anthem Is Required by God, but the Pledge is Socialist 2017-09-26T16:07:44-04:00 Libby Anne

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

To the surprise of no one, controversial pastor Doug Wilson has written a long, rambling blog post condemning the actions of Colin Kaepernick and other athletes who have taken the knee to protest racially discriminatory policing. Wilson may be an influential conservative evangelical author and minister, but he is also a troll, and I wasn’t going to bother responding—until a paragraph toward the end changed my mind, that is.

Next, the Pledge of Allegiance, given its socialist origins, and its use of the word indivisible (an attribute of deity) is problematic. It is a reasonable wish for us to hope that our country might never be divided, but it is statist nonsense to say a country is incapable of division, which is what indivisible means. It would be better to say, in pious Christian fashion, long live the king. It is not so good to say may the king live forever. Kings don’t live forever, whatever we want, but they can live a long time, and if they are decent rulers we can live in a relatively stable place. The Scriptures require us to be advocates of that.

Bear in mind that Wilson spent the entire post grousing about those who are taking down Confederate flags and statues. He called such activists “iconoclasts” and argued that Kaepernick’s action was illegitimate because the Bible commands Christians to “honor the emperor.” He attributed criticism of the national anthem to the fact that Francis Scott Key owned slaves and summarily dismissed it without any mention of the song’s lyrics, the actual reason Key chose the anthem to kneel.

And then, after all of that, Wilson declares the pledge of allegiance “problematic” due to “socialist origins” and the dictionary definition of the term “indivisible.” I’m sorry, but what kind of double standard is this?! Wilson has a problem with the pledge because its author, Francis Bellamy, was a socialist minister, but he simultaneously mocks those who point out that Francis Scott Key was a slaveowner as ridiculous. This is as close to the dictionary definition of a double standard as you can get.

In case you’re wondering, Bellamy worked at a family-centered magazine called Youth’s Companion and composed the pledge to be recited by school children as part of a Columbus Day school ceremony officially endorsed by Congress in 1892. Bellamy later said that he composed it with the memory of the Civil War in mind, which is why it stressed the nation’s indivisibility, along with liberty and justice. The pledge does not appear to have been inspired by Bellamy’s socialism in any way.

If Wilson is allowed to take issue with the pledge of allegiance over grammar and semantics, Kaepernick is certainly allowed to take issue with the national anthem because one of its stanzas glorifies the battlefield slaughter of slaves who ran away to fight for the British in return for freedom. One of these two men has principles; the other is simply being a smart-ass.

I bet Kaepernick wishes grammar and semantics were the most important things on his radar.

What’s most bizarre about all of this is Wilson appears to see no contradiction in what he is writing. Referring to standing during the national anthem, Wilson writes that “not only does the Bible allow for displays of this kind of honor, it requires us to participate in them as appropriate.” Wilson, in other words, writes that Kaepernick and other athletes are required by God to stand during the anthem—and then, several paragraphs later, he takes issue with the wording of the pledge of allegiance and advises Christians to alter the pledge when saying it.

This may be the most tone deaf I have seen Wilson yet.

I have a Patreon! Please support my writing!

Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism

race

Previous Post



September 26, 2017

Progressive Piety and Conservative Politics: On Kaepernick, Tebow, and American Christianity

Next Post



September 28, 2017 TTUAC: Romanticizing Poverty


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atheism Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism Family Feminism Homeschool Meta Parenting Patriarchy Politics Purity Quiverfull Social Justice Uncategorized Worthwhile reads

Select a Month February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which Gospel contains the "Sermon on the Mount"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

John Matthew Mark Luke

Related posts from Love, Joy, Feminism

Nonreligious

Maybe Let's Not Read More Puritans

Love, Joy, Feminism

Nonreligious

Feminists, Repent!

Love, Joy, Feminism

Nonreligious

"So Your Problem with Christianity is the Jesus...

Love, Joy, Feminism

Nonreligious

No, the "Second Shift" Isn't Feminism's Fault

Love, Joy, Feminism

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Nonreligious

Dethroning Jesus and Enthroning Yourself

Jesus Never Asked to Be Worshipped. He Asked to Be Understood. Christianity...

Why Most Christians are Really Paulians and Jobians

I Don't Care, But It Matters Let's get this out of the...

Essential Tips to Successfully Navigate the Selling Process

Selling a house can feel overwhelming, but it doesn’t have to be....

To Make Remote Work Effective, Think About Others

The COVID-19 pandemic forced many companies to rapidly transition to remote work....

Flexibility Is Key to Solving Problems of Tomorrow

The world of work is undergoing a dramatic transformation. The COVID-19 pandemic...

view all Nonreligious blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube