BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian
Beliefs
- Buddhist
- Catholic
- Contemplative
- Evangelical
- General Christian
- Hindu
- Jewish
- Latter-day Saint
- More Voices
- Muslim
- New Visions
- Pagan
- Progressive Christian
Topics
- Religion News
- Food and Religion
- Sports and Religion
- Religious Art
- Religious Music and Entertainment
- Religious Events
- History and Religion
- Style and Religion
- Politics and Religion
- Women in Religion
- Recreation Outdoors and Religion
- Business Finance and Religion
- Careers Workplace and Religion
- Education and Religion
- Family Parenting and Religion
- Health Fitness and Religion
- Home and Religion
- Relationships and Religion
- Technology and Religion
- Travel and Religion
Columnists
- Buddhist Columnists
- Business Finance and Religion Columnists
- Careers Workplace and Religion Columnists
- Catholic Columnists
- Contemplative Columnists
- Education and Religion Columnists
- Evangelists Columnists
- Family Parenting and Religion Columnists
- General Christian Columnists
- Health Fitness and Religion Columnists
- Hindu Columnists
- History and Religion Columnists
- Home and Religion Columnists
- Jewish Columnists
- More Voices Columnists
- Latter Day Columnists
- Muslim Columnists
- New Visions Columnists
- Nonreligious Columnists
- Pagan Columnists
- Politics and Religion Columnists
- Progressive Columnists
- Recreation Outdoors and Religion Columnists
- Relationships and Religion Columnists
- Religion News Columnists
- Religious Art Columnists
- Religious Events Columnists
- Religious Music and Entertainment Columnists
- Sports and Religion Columnists
- Style and Religion Columnists
- Technology and Religion Columnists
- Travel and Religion Columnists
- Women in Religion Columnists
Resource Library
- 2026 Calendar
- Library of World Religions
- The 100 Most Holy Places on Earth
- Patheos Answers
- Podcasts
- Videos
- Faith Leaders Database
- Anglican Episcopalian
- Bahai
- Baptist
- Buddhism
- Christianity
- Confucianism
- Eastern Orthodoxy
- Hinduism
- Holiness and Pentecostal
- ISKCON
- Islam
- Judaism
- Lutheran
- Methodist
- The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
- New Age
- Paganism
- Presbytarian and Reformed
- Protestantism
- Religion Behind the Scenes
- Roman Catholic
- Scientology
- Shia Islam
- Sikhism
- Sufism
- Sunni Islam
- Taoism
- Zen
- See all religions
Research Tools
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
- Trending:
- Forgiveness
- |
- Marriage
- |
- Consciousness
- |
- Death Penalty
- |
- Election
- |
- Halloween
Love, Joy, Feminism
-
More
- Home
- Nonreligious
- Right-Wing Pastor Blames Obama and BLM for White Supremacism
Right-Wing Pastor Blames Obama and BLM for White Supremacism
Last updated on: August 24, 2017 at 10:56 am by Libby Anne
Right-Wing Pastor Blames Obama and BLM for White Supremacism 2017-08-24T10:56:52-04:00 Libby Anne
Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.
In a video posted on his Facebook page over the weekend, right-wing pastor Rick Joyner blamed Barack Obama for the current rise of white supremacist groups in America.
Joyner said that those who have criticized President Trump for not denouncing white supremacists forcefully enough following the violence in Charlottesville but have not denounced Black Lives Matter “are hypocrites of the worst order” because BLM is far more responsible “for the divisions rising in America than the white supremacist groups.”
“Why do I say that?” Joyner said. “Because the white supremacist groups probably would not exist now if it had not been for Obama. They were just about fading out, we had just about dealt with racism in America.”
Joyner said that while he did not approve of Obama’s policies, he was very proud “to be a part of a nation that would elect someone from a minority like that as their president” and that he had high hopes that Obama would “help continue the healing of the racial division in America.”
“That didn’t happen,” Joyner lamented. “It went the other direction, threw fuel on the fire of racism in our country.”
If you look only at the surface level and not beyond it, there is some intuitive sense to what Joyner says. White people like Joyner didn’t typically hear about black men being killed by police—or about black boys being followed by security—before Black Lives Matter. White people like Joyner rarely heard about white supremacist groups until Obama’s election, when these groups expanded, grew, and became more vocal. The problem is that Joyner posits that this is cause and effect.
The truth is this: Racism is more comfortable (for white people) when it is invisible. Out of sight, out of mind, if you will. At issue is not actually the presence or absence of racism—black men were getting shot by police long before Michael Brown and Ferguson, Missouri—but the visibility of racism. Black Lives Matter didn’t create racial tensions. It laid bare existing racial tensions. It made racism visible, and that makes white people uncomfortable.
It’s much easier to pretend that we live in a meritocracy than it is to acknowledge that we never fixed racism.
Obama’s election did the same thing Black Lives Matter has done—it brought racism that already existed out of the shadows. It did not create racism. Joyner claims that “white supremacist groups probably would not exist now if it had not been for Obama.” I mean, really? It is absolutely true that we saw an increase in white supremacist organizing under Obama. But that was because the idea of having a black president outraged white supremacists.
You know what? In a twisted way, Joyner is right. We likely would not see the white supremacist groups we do today if Obama had not been elected—or if Black Lives Matter had never hit the national stage. When white supremacy is the rule of the land, there is no need to protect it. When white supremacy is challenged, its defenders spring into action.
But that does not mean racism and white supremacy did not already exist. It just means these things were largely invisible—to white people.
You know who cannot ignore racism? People of color. People of color cannot ignore racism. White people like Joyner may have gone for years assuming that racism was a think of the past, but people of color don’t generally have that luxury.
I was in a training session led by a thirty-something black man a few months ago. He talked about growing up in an African American community and gradually becoming aware of racism when he entered more integrated spaces. He mentioned walking down the street and watching white people lock their car doors as he went by. That is an experience I have never had, and never will have. It is an experience that is invisible—to me, but not to him.
There is precedent for responses like Joyner’s. None of this is new. In his Letter from a Birmingham Jail, Martin Luther King Jr. wrote as follows:
I had hoped that the white moderate would understand that the present tension in the South is a necessary phase of the transition from an obnoxious negative peace, in which the Negro passively accepted his unjust plight, to a substantive and positive peace, in which all men will respect the dignity and worth of human personality. Actually, we who engage in nonviolent direct action are not the creators of tension. We merely bring to the surface the hidden tension that is already alive. We bring it out in the open, where it can be seen and dealt with. Like a boil that can never be cured so long as it is covered up but must be opened with all its ugliness to the natural medicines of air and light, injustice must be exposed, with all the tension its exposure creates, to the light of human conscience and the air of national opinion before it can be cured.
I have been amazed, over the past few years, to see how closely white responses to Black Lives Matter line up to white responses to the civil rights movement five decades ago. We like to imagine that we would have been marching alongside Martin Luther King, Jr., if we had been alive at the time. But would we? How we react to Black Lives Matter—our involvement in or criticism of that group—likely provides a proximate answer.
Previous Post

August 23, 2017
Tucker Carlson's Strange Attempt to Condemn Slavery
Next Post

August 25, 2017 A Voice in the Wind: A Joyless Homecoming
Browse Our Archives
Select a Category Atheism Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism Family Feminism Homeschool Meta Parenting Patriarchy Politics Purity Quiverfull Social Justice Uncategorized Worthwhile reads
Select a Month February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011
Follow Us!
TAKE THE
Religious Wisdom Quiz
Who was the Roman emperor when Jesus was crucified?
Select your answer to see how you score.
Caligula Tiberius Augustus Nero
Related posts from Love, Joy, Feminism
"Liberal" and "Conservative" Have Actual Meanings
It's not about the economy, it's about being...
Impeachment Could Have Been a Gift to Republicans
TRENDING AT PATHEOS Nonreligious
Dethroning Jesus and Enthroning Yourself
Jesus Never Asked to Be Worshipped. He Asked to Be Understood. Christianity...
Why Most Christians are Really Paulians and Jobians
I Don't Care, But It Matters Let's get this out of the...
Essential Tips to Successfully Navigate the Selling Process
Selling a house can feel overwhelming, but it doesn’t have to be....
To Make Remote Work Effective, Think About Others
The COVID-19 pandemic forced many companies to rapidly transition to remote work....
Flexibility Is Key to Solving Problems of Tomorrow
The world of work is undergoing a dramatic transformation. The COVID-19 pandemic...
view all Nonreligious blogs
Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support
- About Us
- 2026 Calendar
- Videos
- Podcasts
- Library of World Religions
- Faith In Media Tracker
- Advertise With Us
- Write for Us
- Privacy Policy
- Terms of Service
- Do Not Sell My Data
- Contact Us
- Radiant Digital
- Manage Newsletter Subscriptions
- Unsubscribe From Notifications
- Sitemap
Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.
Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In









