Bryan Fischer: The Rainbow Flag Is a Hate Symbol Just Like the Confederate Flag

Last updated on: August 30, 2017 at 5:00 am by Libby Anne

Bryan Fischer: The Rainbow Flag Is a Hate Symbol Just Like the Confederate Flag 2017-08-29T12:45:49-04:00 Libby Anne

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Have a look at this, from RightWingWatch:

Bryan Fischer used his American Family Radio program on Friday to reissue his demand that the rainbow flag be removed from public places on the grounds that it is offensive and divisive.

Reacting to reports that some schools in North Carolina have begun implementing dress codes that include bans on representations of the Confederate flag, Fischer said the same policy should apply to rainbow flags.

“If we are going to ban the Confederate flag because it is divisive, how about we ban the LGBT flag at school?” he said. “If we are going to ban the Confederate flag at school because it creates division, because it arouses division, because it is offensive to people, because it so violates their most deeply held values about human sexuality, I propose that everywhere—everywhere—where the Confederate flag is banned, that we propose that along with it, at the same time, that the LGBT rainbow flag be banned at exactly the same time for exactly the same reasons.”

“It is offensive, it is contrary to our most deeply held values, it divides people, it does not bring them together,” Fischer asserted. “It’s time to have the LGBT flag banned right alongside the Confederate flag. If we’re going to ban one, I submit we need to ban the other.”

It appears that Fischer was responding to a new dress code in Durham, North Carolina, which bars students from wearing clothing that displays swasticas, Confederate flags, or KKK symbols. Fischer claims that Durham Public Schools (DPS) banned the Confederate flag “because it arouses division” and “is offensive to people.”

But is that accurate? In a word, no. According to the Durham Herald Sun:

DPS’ revised policy bans items “reasonably expected to intimidate other students on the basis of race (for example the Confederate battle flag, Nazi swastika, and Ku Klux Klan or KKK) religion, ancestry, national origin, gender, socioeconomic status, academic status, gender identity, physical appearance, sexual orientation, mental, physical, developmental, or sensory disability, immigration status, or any other classification that is protected by law, regulation or Board policy.”

In other words, items depicting the Confederate flag were banned because they could “reasonably be expected to intimidate other students on the basis of race.” The issue was not being “divisive” or “offensive.” The issue was intimidation. This really isn’t hard to learn, either—all you have to do is google. Heck, even Fox News is reporting accurately on this. Is there a reason Fischer felt the need to misrepresent DPS’ policy to the point of changing it completely?

Fischer says he wants some sort of equality of opportunity—that if we’re going to ban one thing for being divisive (the Confederate flag), we should ban other things that are divisive too (the gay pride flag). However, DPS’ policy never applied only to the Confederate flag (something he would know if he bothered to use google). It also bans items that can be “reasonably expected to intimidate other students” on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity, as well as religion, gender, and so forth.

The problem with Fischer’s argument, of course, is that the point of comparison was never divisiveness. The policy banned items that could be reasonably expected to intimidate other students. The entire point of the Confederate flag is intimidation. That’s why it is banned. The gay pride flag, however, has never been about intimidating straight people—or religious people.

Fischer has this exactly backwards. The white supremacist believes that black people are inferior. The fundamentalist Christian believes that gay and lesbian people live lives that are morally inferior. White supremacists demonize black people as thugs and brutes. Fundamentalist Christians smear gay and lesbian individuals as child molesters. White supremacists shun contact with black people. Fundamentalist Christians disown their gay children. You see where this is going?

Fischer argued that we should ban the gay pride flag “because it is offensive to people.” Why is it offensive? Fischer writes of a flag that “violates their most deeply held values about human sexuality”; oddly, he seems to be referring to the Confederate flag. This was a radio program; doubtless he just misspoke. Still, this does open some interesting avenues for comparison.

For many decades, white supremacists found the idea of interracial marriage utterly repugnant. Preventing miscegenation was arguably one of the primary reasons for opposing the desegregation of the public schools. “These are not bad people,” President Dwight D. Eisenhower wrote to Chief Justice Earl Warren in 1954. “They just don’t want their sweet little daughters to have to sit next to some big black buck.” Because, well, who knows what might happen.

While interracial marriage has been the law of the land since 1967, a majority of white people in this country continued to oppose interracial marriage until the mid-1990s. Even today, much Nazi and KKK rhetoric focuses on protecting “racial purity”—which in practice means keeping white women from taking up with black men. Indeed, Nazi and KKK rhetoric about white womanhood and purity cannot be divorced from concern about sex—who is having it with whom, and with what consequences.

Do you see the comparison? Both white supremacists and fundamentalist Christians worry very much about who is having sex with whom. White supremacists are concerned about interracial marriage; fundamentalist Christians are concerned about same-sex marriage. But at the end of the day, the crux of the matter is this: There is a difference between having your own rights violated or curtailed, and being upset that you cannot violate or curtail another’s rights. A big freaking difference.

Durham Public Schools already has the equal opportunity policy Fischer claims to want. Students are barred from wearing any items “reasonably expected to intimidate other students” based on their sexual orientation or religion, which presumably includes being straight or fundamentalist. Being offended by someone else’s sexual orientation, however, is not on the list.

Also. Whatever happened to the Right making fun of “special snowflakes”?

Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism

LGBTQ

Previous Post

August 29, 2017

Why Did Baltimore Even Have Confederate Statues?

Next Post

August 31, 2017 How Southern Democrats Became Republicans: A Case Study of Carroll County, Mississippi

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atheism Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism Family Feminism Homeschool Meta Parenting Patriarchy Politics Purity Quiverfull Social Justice Uncategorized Worthwhile reads

Select a Month February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of ____.

Select your answer to see how you score.

God Truth Heaven Grace