Pregnant Women Are Hosts: New Terminology, Same Old Argument

Last updated on: February 13, 2017 at 7:16 pm by Libby Anne

Pregnant Women Are Hosts: New Terminology, Same Old Argument 2017-02-13T19:16:18-04:00 Libby Anne

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Rep. Justin Humphrey, an Oklahoma lawmaker, has introduced a bill that would require a woman to get written permission from her sexual partner before obtaining an abortion. And there’s more.

At first, Humphrey said that the original intention of the bill was to ensure that fathers are involved in supporting a child from conception. “I was wanting fathers to have to pay child support at the beginning,” he said, but that specific language was excised from the bill.

Ultimately, he said, his intent was to let men have a say. “I believe one of the breakdowns in our society is that we have excluded the man out of all of these types of decisions,” he said. “I understand that they feel like that is their body,” he said of women. “I feel like it is a separate — what I call them is, is you’re a ‘host.’ And you know when you enter into a relationship you’re going to be that host and so, you know, if you pre-know that then take all precautions and don’t get pregnant,” he explained. “So that’s where I’m at. I’m like, hey, your body is your body and be responsible with it. But after you’re irresponsible then don’t claim, well, I can just go and do this with another body, when you’re the host and you invited that in.”

It’s 2017, people! This wasn’t okay in 1950 and it isn’t okay now!

Humphrey went so far as to refer to a pregnant woman as a “host.” I often try to shift individuals who are anti-abortion away from abortion restrictions by arguing that things like effective birth control or maternity leave and childcare subsidies are a far better way to cut the abortion rate than a ban (with its accompanying DIY abortions and elevated women’s health problems). But this? Rhetoric like this makes it hard for me to have a rational conversation.

Let’s look closer at this bit for a moment:

“And you know when you enter into a relationship you’re going to be that host and so, you know, if you pre-know that then take all precautions and don’t get pregnant.”

This is incredibly garbled, but if I’m reading it correctly Humphrey is saying that having unprotected sex is the equivalent of agreeing to be a host and inviting the — zygote? embryo? fetus? — into your body. This idea isn’t actually that fringe in anti-abortion circles, it’s just not usually stated in such a blatantly offensive way.

After all, check out this bit:

“I’m like, hey, your body is your body and be responsible with it. But after you’re irresponsible then don’t claim, well, I can just go and do this with another body, when you’re the host and you invited that in.”

Interestingly, the people who make this argument are the same ones who are completely behind the “Castle Doctrine,” which allows individuals to lethally shoot people who come into their home uninvited. Based on his statement above, Humphrey would argue that having unprotected sex is the equivalent of “inviting” the parasite (I’ll use that language since Humphrey is) into your body. But at the same time, I doubt Humphrey would see leaving one’s front door unlocked (or even open) as the equivalent of “inviting” strangers into one’s home.

This is veering uncomfortably close to drawing an equivalence between a woman’s body and a piece of property. Let me just leave you with this: Conservatives believe in individuals’ right to protect the sanctity of their homes with lethal force, but not in women’s right to protect the sanctity of their bodies with lethal force.

I’ve been writing about this basic issue for at least half a decade and I’m seriously tired of it. I well remember being pregnant—I’ve done it twice—and I didn’t like feeling inhabited. It did feel like I’d lost control over my body. I tolerated it because my pregnancies were intentional, wanted pregnancies. I cannot even imagine what it would be like to require someone to go through an entire pregnancy against their will.

I could go into all the various arguments at play here. I could point out that the vast, vast majority of abortions occur in the first trimester, and that having an abortion is a form of taking responsibility. I could point out that all birth control methods fail sometimes, and that his party typically opposes giving women affordable access to the most effective forms of contraceptives. I could point out the absurdity of Humphrey introducing a bill that does not actually affect him, given his reproductive anatomy. I could point out the horribly huge problems with treating women as a host, and robbing her of her of her control of her own body.

But today I am just tired.

On the plus side, at least Humphrey is laying bare an argument conservatives have been making for quite some time, and using language so extreme that maybe—just maybe—it’ll jolt some people out of their complacency.

I have a Patreon! Please support my writing!

Feminism

Politics

abortion

Previous Post

February 13, 2017

On Calls for Homeschooling in Response to DeVos

Next Post

February 14, 2017 Inequalities Abound: Betsy DeVos and School Closures

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atheism Evangelicalism/Fundamentalism Family Feminism Homeschool Meta Parenting Patriarchy Politics Purity Quiverfull Social Justice Uncategorized Worthwhile reads

Select a Month February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What bird did Noah release second from the ark?

Select your answer to see how you score.

A sparrow A dove A raven An eagle